Tennis Prose




Dec/16

24

She Won’t Give Up: Junri Namigata’s Example of Perseverance Rewarded

Junri Namigata

By Scoop Malinowski

Junri Namigata’s perseverance has been rewarded. The Japanese veteran qualified for the Australian Open main draw in doubles (with her partner Chin Wei Chan) by winning the Asia Pacific Wildcard tournament in China 1-6 6-4 10-8 over a pair of young Asian players Ching Wen Hsu and Kei Chen Chang.

The now 34-year-old Namigata’s career has not been your typical journey. She played college tennis in Japan at Waseda University and turned pro in 2005.  Success has been sporadic. She reached the third round of US Open qualies in 2006. The five-foot, seven inch tall Namigata actually reached the doubles finals in Bangkok in 2007 with Ayumi Morita but lost the final by walkover.

In 2008 Namigata lost in the first round of Wimbledon main draw doubles. In 2010 she reached the third round of Wimbledon and US Open singles qualies for the second time.

In 2011, Namigata reached the main draws of the Australian  Open and Roland Garros but lost in the first rounds of both. She has never reached the second round of a Grand Slam main draw.

Finally, three years later in 2014, Namigata’s perseverance paid off as she won her first and only WTA title, in doubles at the inaugural Jiangxi tournament, winning the final with partner Chuang Chia-Jung 76 63 vs. Xu Yifan and Chin Wei-Chan.

 

In her eleven year professional career, Namigata’s career high ranking in singles was 105 (in 2011) and 101 in doubles (2015). Right now she’s ranked 253 in singles.  Her career prize money according to Wikipedia is $459,390. Overall, Namigata has won six ITF singles titles and 18 doubles.

But her career received a new surge this week by winning the Asia Pacific doubles wildcard final which was contested in China.

It was a fascinating match. The quality of tennis was outstanding. All four players were ripping rockets all over the court and it was hard to believe all four players were unknown to even the most devoted tennis followers. Namigata, playing with a Prince racquet and wearing a no frills brand outfit with white adidas shoes, stood out in that she was the most expressive, often smiling and showing “anxiety” as the TV commentator Todd Woodbridge commented.

Namigata and her partner got smoked in the first set 1-6, losing two no-ad deciding points.  But in the second set they managed to change the flow of the one-sided match and won a key no-ad deciding point at 4-3 and then finished the set to force the ten-point super tiebreaker. At 8-8, the opposing team double-faulted into the net and then on the final point of the match a volley winner by partner Chan, set up by Namigata’s relentless and powerful baseline ground strokes, clinched the victory – and the slot into the Australian Open main draw of women’s doubles.

Namigata raised her arms high like a champion boxer and flashed a bright smile. For only the fourth time in her eleven-year pro career Namigata will compete in the main draw of a Grand Slam event.

 

Junri Namigata 1, 2015 Wimbledon Qualifying - Diliff.jpg

No tags

166 comments

  • Hartt · December 27, 2016 at 6:01 pm

    Andrew, I had not read that SI mailbag with Milos since it appeared in 2014 (although I kept notes on his reply to my net play question). I had forgotten how thoughtful his answers were. And he is obviously a student of the game; in response to the female coach question he knew Mauresmo had worked with Llodra and that Istomin had been coached by his mother. His crystal ball was off, though, when he did not think a high profile ATP player would have a female coach in the near future.

  • Hartt · December 27, 2016 at 6:07 pm

    I think Milos has good, but not great, movement. But I imagine the players who have excellent movement would love to have his serve. Hard to have it all!

    I love “all the ingredients are there he just has to bake the cake now.” Totally agree.

  • Andrew Miller · December 27, 2016 at 6:17 pm

    Rainics movement is better and can’t improve to much more. Goal in tennis strategy is apply your x to players o’s, way it is. Raonic has to win serve games with ease and crack winners off returns and get out of the big guy playing small guy game. Point is his movement will NEVER match Nadal not even an injured Nadal, and even Nadal benefitted from cranking up the mph on his serve especially on hard courts.
    Being great on every shot in the book is the road to terrible tennis. Players today suffer from a lack of necessary shots and strategy.
    If a player does it all they do nothing. Kerber isn’t Karlovic for a reason!
    Raomics movement is what it is. He wont be a ballet dancer ever, not in this life. His best bet is to go big early and often and pounce. Get off the court quickly. The guy has a history of breaking down. No need to make it worse.

  • Andrew Miller · December 27, 2016 at 7:14 pm

    Yes Hartt I notice Raonic in his SI mailbag and in his post essay before USOPEN this year he has a sharp analytical take on the game, pretty concise and for the most part aware of every facet of his game. Must be a dream player to coach, or an easy choice for a big name coach who has a player ready to work. His note on it taking six to eight months for a coach to show worth was interesting if not mistaken. I think he was trying to say as you said I think a coach shouldn’t be fired while a player is implementing changes.
    Raonic was probably pleasantly surprised with Moya as the influence was immediate in terms of a more fluid Raonic. And like Hartt said also Raonic was wrong on Murray as he indeed hired Mauresmo.
    By the way with all the Lendl praise that I also contribute to, lets credit Mauresmo in part for Murrays resurgence. Lendl had just dumped an injured Murray and Murray hired Mauresmo, who played a huge part in bringing Murray back to baseline. He didn’t have a bad 2015, being shown up only by Djoker and then winning Davis Cup. The reason Lendl came back at all because he was rejoining a Murray that was back in his element, not the injured Murray who begged Lendl to stay on board.
    It was a no risk no brainer for Lendl to rejoin team Murray. And that’s in part because of Amelie.

  • Andrew Miller · December 27, 2016 at 10:35 pm

    Fitting, Wertheim picks Murray as best ATP player for 2016 Delpo best comeback, Zverev Alex newcomer. Close call for Murray but I agree, he stole part II of the year under Djokpvics nose and Djoko cooled off right when we thought he was like immortal. Good close call by Wertheim agree with him.

    Is this Ivanovics last year? I’m thinking she’s calling it quits and making this a farewell tour. This is on the news that she’s making an announcement. Dont think it’s a Sharpie meldo announcement. I think it’s a I’m done with tennis forever announcement and farewell tour for fans.

  • catherine bell · December 28, 2016 at 3:53 am

    Ivanovic makes me laugh 🙂

    She certainly knows how to tweak the media – and they fall for it every single time 🙂

    Who cares if she’s retiring ? I mean who cares enough to make this big thing of it ? Just put out something on Twitter.

    Oh – silly me. That wouldn’t be a story would it ?

  • Andrew Miller · December 28, 2016 at 8:01 am

    Catherine I think some players like Ivanovic have huge fan bases, similar to Kim Clijsters. But I think unlike Clijsters journalists and fans both love Ivanovic. Seems Ivanovic is going the twitter route as a direct appeal to fans, maybe on advice of public relations agents, to keep her endorsements.

    I don’t remember who it is among TP folks someone said always watch the money! And it’s true. Got to watch appearance money exhibition money possibility a coach raised his rate money, etc as to why players do what they do. Especially when it comes to a player who has been streaky and whose popularity is greater than their recent results. This is a play to fandom. Folks, I want to tell you first. Etc.

    In general though, the wta has become totally topsy turvy. There is only randomness as of last year and it is a free for all where prepared players should grab titles. Kerber saw it. The middle rung of players is hollowing out. Cibulkova saw it. Pliskova saw it. The old guard is still doing well, but the barbarians are at the gate.

    I think the ATP is heading there too, which is why Raonic should feel good going into 2017 and 2018. Hold on to your hats!

  • catherine bell · December 28, 2016 at 8:39 am

    Andrew –

    You’ve intrigued me 🙂

    Who didn’t like Clijsters – fans or journalists ?
    Unfortunately I missed much of her career so although I’ve seen her play on clips etc I don’t know much about her public appeal.

    WTA ‘old guard’ really consists of Serena now, and by the end of the year will probably include Angie (and Radwanska ?) as well so we need to see players under 25 stepping up, although the arc of a great career probably starts much earlier than that.

  • Andrew Miller · December 28, 2016 at 9:32 am

    Catherine I think Clijsters got a pass from fandom but some journalists weren’t quite on board. I’m thinking of one big one but I may be getting this wrong, they were distrustful of the persona of nice Clijsters where the only thing that mattered was warm fuzziness when he saw her as a far tougher player on court! Basically the off court persona was pr warm fuzziness and on court was more the real deal, nice yet ruthless when it came to smashing the ball.

    I wonder on the ATP if someone will come from nowhere this year to spoil the big five or six party. I like the spoiler in Lucas Pouille with his versatile game. Or if vets like Monfils give fans what we all want or Tsonga.

  • Hartt · December 28, 2016 at 9:54 am

    Doubles news. Roger-Vasselin announced on Facebook that he is retiring from singles because of ongoing hip problems and will concentrate on doubles. His singles ranking is just under 300, so this makes sense. He is scheduled to play some doubles with Nestor and I hope ERV’s concentration on doubles means those 2 will play a lot more.

    They had good success together in 2016, winning both Washington and Antwerp. After the Antwerp win, Nestor was quoted on the ATP site: “Anti-inflammatories, good partners. At this point in my career, whenever somebody asks me to play I say yes,” joked Nestor. Danny is now 44 and ERV, at 33, sounds like a youngster in comparison.

  • catherine bell · December 28, 2016 at 10:00 am

    Thanks about Clijsters – I’d suspect both sides of her were ‘real’ – but maybe some observers didn’t quite believe that.

    The only player I saw who communicated a ‘warm’ personality both on and off court was Evonne Goolagong, and she could have benefitted from a bit more toughness in her competitive makeup. Would’ve probably finished with a better record at W’don than two titles nine years apart.

  • catherine bell · December 28, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    Ana Ivanovic – so farewell then.
    2017 will be the year of retirements 🙂

  • Hartt · December 28, 2016 at 3:25 pm

    Guess Ana’s retirement was not a huge surprise but am sort of sad she will no longer be on the Tour.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 28, 2016 at 3:54 pm

    Catherine: Kuznetsova is and always was very nice on and off court since her junior days to today – Wozniacki too – there are tons like this and also a few who are on the colder and aloof side –

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 28, 2016 at 3:58 pm

    Catherine: Ana was no 1 in the world and it’s big news when that calibre of player decides to retire because so few do as most players try to play for as long as possible (Fed Serena Step Haas Nestor Paes Lopez Verdasco Estella Burgos etc

  • Andrew Miller · December 28, 2016 at 7:40 pm

    Seems players retire if they can and want to. Roddick retired with fewer km on the speedometer so too many others. Then there are folks like Karlovic finding themselves Davis Cup finals warriors late career. Tennis such an individual sport. Knowing when to call it quits an art. Agassi said it was his job and he’d let everyone know. Fish walked away due to a freak injury. Sampras went out young and in glory. Santoro stayed as long as possible. Ivabovic I’m sorry to see her go. She was very hard on herself and clearly she expresses if she doesn’t feel like she can put her all in she’s done. Pennetta did the same. To my eyes they are all young but if a player like Ivabovic emphasizes she’s been in the sport for decades and a pro for over 12 years, and has the money to walk away, abmd can stay involved as a guest announcer why not.
    More than the men’s side seems we are losing a lot of wta vets. Few will pull a Kimiko Date. Bottom line the wta in particular and the ATP soon enough will see youth movements and new faces. Nothing new.

  • catherine bell · December 29, 2016 at 3:26 am

    Andrew
    Some retirements surprise you,some not. Ivanovic not really – her career was more or less over and she just married.

    She was a good player for a while but never got further than what I’d call ‘mid-list’. Her serve went south long ago. Not sure why.

    Her looks gained her more attention than she might have garnered otherwise but then that’s the way of the world.

    For the future, I may be wrong but I can’t see Kerber hanging around for ever and on the men’s side I think Murray may find other things to do when he feels he’s accomplished his goals.

    But both will propbably surprise me 🙂

  • Hartt · December 29, 2016 at 6:30 am

    Yes, Ana’s serve, especially that errant ball toss, was a mystery. I think I even ended up yelling at her (to the TV) after about the 10th terrible toss. Have to think nerves got the better of her but it still seemed strange for such an experienced pro.

    When she had a bit of an upswing in her career I hoped she could keep that up but it did not happen. Although it’s true she was a “mid-list” player there was something appealing about her beyond her good looks and I usually rooted for her. (Although some of her celebration moves after good points could be a bit much.)

    As far as when Kerber retires I think it’s hard to say. Probably will have a lot to do with how her body holds up and how much she still enjoys playing. As for Andy I would be very surprised if he retired within the next 3 years. Am not sure what would satisfy him in terms of goals but there are a lot more Slams he could win.

  • Andrew Miller · December 29, 2016 at 7:53 am

    Ha Hartt is right! Ivanovic indeed overcelebrates haha! True. Errant ball toss true. She had a way when on of huge serving but when off it was no fun for her and painful in the stands. Yep. When she was hitting stride in 2008 she really looked set to dominate the field! Then she wins French and it became eight years of wobblyville.

    But she will go down as starting the Serbian revolution in tennis motivating Jankovic then Djoker. It was amazing until it became all Djoker all the time!

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 29, 2016 at 8:04 am

    Ivanovic is married now and probably wants to move on to the next chapter of life – she probably realized her days at the top were over and she isn’t interested in being a journeywoman type player – she worked hard for years to get back to the top but she was not able to pull it off though she did have some good runs and she did come close a few times – I think her toss issues are easy to understand: pressure and nerves can make a player play it safe on the serve and toss it a slight bit to the right rather than forward and in front – I did this for years and still do sometimes – then you lose racquet speed and are afraid to accelerate and you push the serve – Ana (and Kournikova) had these tendencies but eventually overcame it – She was a great champion and gave us many great matches and moments and will always be remembered for tennis greatness and a nice pleasant personality –

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 29, 2016 at 8:11 am

    Good point Andrew: Ana did open the door for Serbian tennis – she was the pioneer trailblazer who sparked a revolution – her great success showed the young great Serbian players that they could do it too – And they sure did do it and are continuing to do it and there are young Serbians coming up strong too like Kecmanovic – Ivanovic is an important player in tennis history and her retirement is big news – Kind of a curious way to quit the sport by having her last matches being the poor showing in IPTL – It would have been nice to see her get a proper send off at the Aussie Open –

  • Andrew Miller · December 29, 2016 at 8:12 am

    I rooted for Ivanovic hoping that her brilliant form would win the day. However for a very long time I think she may even be the streakiest confidence player on either tour. When she was on fire she was on fire and when she wasn’t she was abysmal. There wasn’t any steady state Ivanovic. There was no Sharpie like ability to just play within the lines or rely on one part of her game to get her back into matches. It was either everything works or fails no middle! As in literally worst set ever seen.

    But her rise to top player was thrilling. Really belted ball back in 2008 and before Bouchard smacked her in the 2014 Australian Open which almost seemed like Ivanovic was back in champ form. It wasn’t a mirage but one wouldn’t be far off if they mistook it for one.

  • catherine bell · December 29, 2016 at 8:47 am

    Hartt-

    Yes – with Andy I think a lot depends on how accurately he himself judges his ability to win major titles and how quickly the so-called next generation players establish themselves.

    Kerber – Angie’s worked long and hard to get to the No 1 spot (and I think we glimpsed a bit at the end of last year how unbelievably important that was to her) and the only two big titles not in her scrapbook are obviously RG and W’don. If she can’t get either of those in the next year or so I can see her looking around for something else.

    If you’ve had that success, been that celebrated in your own country, then it must be hard to view a future career which can only fall short, in her terms at least.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 29, 2016 at 8:58 am

    Andrew: I think Ana was an overachiever – she is pretty slightly built compared to the other top WTA players – her upper body looks like a 90 pound weakling next to Serena or Sharapova or Kerber – one thing we can say for sure is that Ana never took any PEDs because her body is the proof – And for her to get to no 1 in the world and win Roland Garros is an incredible achievement –

  • catherine bell · December 29, 2016 at 9:53 am

    Scoop –

    So you are basically saying that Ana did not put the necessary work in to develop an athletic body ?

    Maybe that failure became characteristic of her general approach to the sport and would account for her streaky career and inability to perform consistently at a high level, which is the mark of a great player – something Ana definitely was not.

    Talented – but I would agree, an overachiever.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 29, 2016 at 10:15 am

    She has a slight body build probably more suited to modeling. Tennis is a very physical sport and Ana’s body is a disadvantage to most of the other WTA players who are bigger and stronger. She has achieved a remarkable Hall of Fame caliber career during the age of “Big Babe Tennis” despite being very far from being a Big Babe Tennis competitor.

  • Hartt · December 29, 2016 at 1:14 pm

    I’m not sure that Ana is actually much smaller than other WTA players. She is listed at 6′ and 152 lbs. Other players around that height include Kvitova (6′, 154 lbs.), Pliskova (6’1″, 159 lbs.) and Venus 6’1″, 160 lbs.) Then there is Sharapova whose stats I do not believe – she is listed at 6’2″ and 130 lbs. If she actually weighed that she would have no muscles at all.

    In photos of Ana stretched out for a shot she has definite muscles. She would be downright plump for a model – the top weight for a professional model is usually 130 lbs.

  • catherine bell · December 29, 2016 at 1:40 pm

    Kerber is listed at 5’8″ and 149 lbs which is not huge and in fact she does not seem heavily built when you see her with other people.

    She has good muscle definition and stamina some of which comes from swimming I’d say as well as tennis training but I wouldn’t really put her in the Big Babe category with the 6′ + women.

  • Hartt · December 29, 2016 at 1:46 pm

    And it is always interesting to see some players in person after seeing them on TV. It seems that the camera really does add weight. I was surprised that Tsonga was downright thin in person compared to how he looked on TV.

  • catherine bell · December 29, 2016 at 2:00 pm

    Hartt –

    Yes the camera is traditionally said to add several pounds to someone’s weight, at least that is the lore among models 🙂

    I always remember when I first met Billie Jean K how small she seemed although she was pretty average in height and weight.

  • catherine bell · December 29, 2016 at 3:22 pm

    What next ?

    Serena engaged ! Retirement this year 🙂

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 29, 2016 at 6:51 pm

    Ivanovic is tall but her upper body does not emote power – but then again I have hit with young teens who were very small and slightly built but they could really wallop the ball –

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 29, 2016 at 6:51 pm

    Pretty interesting that someone proposed to Serena – that was pretty quick – Didn’t know she was involved with anyone – Congrats to Serena –

  • Andrew Miller · December 29, 2016 at 7:34 pm

    One girl half my size and maybe 60 percent my weight kicked my a$%. Scoop unless Ana lying about her weight to make herself look worse I cant say that’s the case. When she got to AO finals she beat Hantuchova in a thrilling semifinal and looked the powerhouse in doing so. Long time ago though. Sometimes she did look too sleight like Hamtuchova. And Sharpie is huge! Fit and huge as in strong. Maybe Ivanovic was sensitive to this.
    She talked a lot about injury but I think after she got what she never dreamed of slam finals a French championship world number one what more to do? Getting second slam is maybe slightly easier because of experience but extremely tough. And Ivanovic again had a Giorgi-like streakiness or James Blake like streakiness in that literally she could beat anyone and lose to anyone. Her press conferences were fascinating as she seems to answer any question straightforwardly I’d guess a journalists dream to talk to and depending on the match either delightful or miserable to watch as a fan!
    Again to me the amazing part of all of her career basically a Serbian girl from a country with not much in the way of a tennis tradition unless you count Seles which you shouldn’t becomes tops in tennis. Literally unbelievable but because we are so uses to it it’s not.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 29, 2016 at 7:57 pm

    Andrew: Ana has always exuded intelligence even when speaking her second language! On top of that she’s a very nice person and a tennis genius (all the top players are) and she’s a miss universe caliber beauty – Ivanovic has been great for tennis and tennis was lucky very lucky to have her –

  • Hartt · December 29, 2016 at 7:58 pm

    What next indeed! There are still 2 days left in 2016. 🙂

  • Andrew Miller · December 29, 2016 at 10:04 pm

    Yes scoop who doesn’t like Ivanovic, who had very little to critique other than Hartts humorous and accurate observations. For what it’s worth am endearing player who may be the nicest of the Serbian trio that took over the sport for parts of the last decade. I think to your point she wasn’t completely wedded to the sport but she also came up in an era where wta players didn’t have to only be about the tennis an era ushered in by the Williams.

  • catherine bell · December 30, 2016 at 3:06 am

    Scoop –

    This guy has been around in Serena’s life for a while. I’ve seen mentions before but all low-key which presumably was the way she wanted it.

    What struck me was that in some pictures he looks like a younger version of Patrick 🙂

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 30, 2016 at 8:58 am

    Andrew: the only minor gripe about Ana (emphasis on minor) was when she tried that squeaky feet routine several years ago in Australia – intentionally squeaking her feet on returns of serve to distract the server – didn’t help too much though and it was abandoned 🙂

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 30, 2016 at 8:59 am

    Catherine: considering how some (or many) famous weddings are do you think it’s possible this is a hoax wedding?

  • catherine bell · December 30, 2016 at 10:24 am

    Scoop –

    No, I don’t. See no reason for Serena to do that.They’ve been together for about a year which is surely a bit long for a ‘hoax’.

    Of course I’ve reached an age (unfortunately) where nothing would surprise me but this engagement seems genuine enough.

  • Andrew Miller · December 30, 2016 at 10:56 am

    Scoop the squeaky sneaks! Forgot that Ivanovic did that. Yes that was obnoxious. So too her somewhat in your face cheering on winning points that Hartt alluded to in Hartts comments. All minor stuff. Ivanovic was for some time far more competitive on court than others who were equally tall and strong, we’re looking at you Vaidisova! The feared big brigade of Davenport like champs, tall women with enormous power games, never materialized. Ivanovic and Kvitova followed Sharpie, maybe Muguruza, all superb tennis athletes with skills and strategies beyond mindless ball bashing. Thankfully. Though Dan often says how boring he finds wta, and with the uniformity of styles one is forgiven for accurately describing what’s right in front of them, I think we can all agree Ivanovic Kvitova even Sharpie have far more developed games more along line of well rounded ATP men’s players. Muguruza, the Spanish Ivanivic, also, as hard to make a Wimbledon final without finesse, athleticism, courage, power or some combination of them
    Aka saying these ladies play like guys is a compliment and to say that some ATP players could take a page from these women’s strategies would be accurate too and a great career move on their part. Or for ATP coaches to take note to help their charges.

  • Andrew Miller · December 30, 2016 at 11:33 am

    Yeah Ana is mid list 🙁 her equivalent in ATP terms is a player from old Spanish armada of nineties like Al Costa. Not even like a DelP , because she didn’t get better after her French run. She figures as a superior player to Myskina and Majoli, anonymous French champs in some ways, had more oomph to her game perhaps than Costa, maybe in par with a JC Ferreru, but seems like a champ that caught fire at right time. Not a Muster. Special for sure in locking down Serbias historic period in tennis. But as Catherine said very mid list among champs recently, and decidedly lower among last few decades of champs.
    That said, a champ is a champ is a champ!

  • catherine bell · December 30, 2016 at 12:09 pm

    Andrew –

    I suppose a ‘champ’ to me is someone who wins early and goes on winning for most of their careers. Piles up the big titles. We all know their names.

    The rest might all be very good players, entertaining etc to watch and winning a few worthy trophies, but they aren’t ‘champs’ – just talented beyond the ordinary.

    Not sure about your comparison with men players – seems to leave out a lot. Where does Serena fit in there ? Or Kerber ? Or Simona, the Kerber-in-waiting ? Or Radwanska ? Etc.

    I don’t know if I’d describe Ivanovic, Kvitova, Muguruza as players with developed games ‘along the lines of well-rounded ATP men’s players’. Not really.
    If so, they’d have a lot more titles by now.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 30, 2016 at 2:04 pm

    Catherine: The relationship with Patrick turned out to be a hoax – this could could be too – for some people “love” is a business – whatever th truth is best wishes to the happy couple –

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 30, 2016 at 2:07 pm

    Anybody who wins a major title (even if it’s “just one”) is a “champion” forever – nobody can ever take it away – Ivanovic is a champion and she was the BEST in the world –

  • catherine bell · December 30, 2016 at 2:46 pm

    Scoop –

    I’m not sure the relationship with Patrick was a hoax. What on earth would have been the point of it ? And who exactly perpetrated this hoax ? They were certainly very close for a time – but how can we possibly know ? Public people can, and do, keep their private lives private if they really want to.

    I do think it’s possible to be too cynical – money isn’t always at the bottom of everything and I doubt Serena and Alexis’ respective bank balances would be an issue here.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 30, 2016 at 2:52 pm

    When did Patrick and Serena break up? Or were they ever really a couple? Rumors abound that Patrick is an opportunist looking to raise his coaching profile but who knows for sure –

  • Hartt · December 30, 2016 at 6:30 pm

    I wondered what would happen next. Well, it’s Andy Murray on the Honours List for a knighthood. I find the idea of knighthood kind of strange, but especially for a young man who is still an active competitor. Do you suppose Andy will shave now? 🙂

  • Andrew Miller · December 30, 2016 at 7:17 pm

    Ivanovic,agree with Scoop. Only 1 player in recent memory was no champ upon his slam title and that is Korda, as he was without question doping in or around competition. Rios put together one of tennis more memorable runsk
    But with Ivanovic she punched through that title and grabbed it during a tough era. True maligning Iva Majoli is unfair. And Ivanivic was a far superior athlete and tennis talent . I thought she’d compete for top player and stay a while. And she was #1 but ephemeral and her tenure was so brief. That’s why we lament it. Somewhat like Andy Roddick but Ivanovic had talent to burn.

1 2 3 4

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com
To top