Tennis Prose




Oct/16

4

Sharapova Ban Reduced to 15 months

miamiopenLooks like Maria Sharapova will be back on court next spring and in time for 2017 Roland Garros, a title she has won twice.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has partially upheld Sharapova’s appeal of the two-year ban she received earlier this year for using the banned substance Meldonium (which was added to the banned list on January 1, 2016). Sharapova, who had tested positive for Meldonium after her quarterfinal loss at the Australian Open to Serena Williams, has had her ban reduced from two years to fifteen months.

The former WTA world No. 1 is eligible to return to the WTA Tour on April 26th, 2017.

“I’ve gone from one of the toughest days of my career last March when I learned about my suspension to now, one of my happiest days, as I found out I can return to tennis in April,” Sharapova said in a statement posted to her Facebook page. “In so many ways, I feel like something I love was taken away from me and it will feel really good to have it back. Tennis is my passion and I have missed it. I am counting the days until I can return to the court.”

No tags

118 comments

  • Dan Markowitz · October 4, 2016 at 2:49 pm

    I might not be so versed on this situation, but I feel she got off lightly. She’d been taking this stuff for 10 years. If I’m not wrong, unlike Serena with her TUE’s, Maria was taking this stuff in doses much higher than she needed to to fight or counteract the maladies she has/had. The excuse that she wasn’t aware that the drug had been outlawed seems pretty flimsy to me. What she really needs a TUE for is for a drug to quiet her grunting.

  • Hartt · October 4, 2016 at 7:06 pm

    The ESPN site has an extensive article about the ITF anti-doping program. It takes careful reading, because some of the info is from pre-2014, and the program has been improved in the last 2-3 years.

    However, they do make a strong case that the ITF needs to do a better job of testing for the substances that are most useful to tennis players: EPO (that reduces fatigue), synthetic testosterone (increases and strengthens muscles), and human growth hormone (recovery from muscle fatigue and injury).

    Stuart Miller, representing the ITF ant-doping program, said that the complete tests for these would add between $1.2 million and $1.6 million per year. Their budget is currently $4 million per year, doubled from 2013. But given the $ associated with tennis, adding say $2 million to the program each year seems like a small price to pay for a more effective system.

    I know some people think that the ITF does not really want a more effective system but the current criticisms and rumours hurt both the ITF and the players.

    As far as players not knowing what the prohibited drugs are, it is a simple matter to check out the WADA site. The list for 2017 is already posted, with a summary of the changes for next year. It might take a doctor to fully understand the list but any athlete should be certain that this is taken seriously.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 5, 2016 at 8:33 am

    Hartt: I think it’s like baseball – the fans really don’t care bout drug testing and possible cheating – they just want to see great tennis and support their heroes – Nadal and Sharapova are big suspects but have either lost any of their supporters because of the allegations and suspicions? I think not –

  • Dan Markowitz · October 5, 2016 at 9:37 am

    I don’t think you should put Nadal in Sharpie’s corner. I don’t know about anyone else, but I’ve certainly lost respect for Sharpie and devalue her career because of her her use of the drug she took for 10 years! Look, there’s a problem in tennis and it might be serious. Look at Nadal and Murray, are these guys just buff because they work out or is it because they take PED’s that allow them to work out more and recover more? In that survey of ATP players, 65% said they still don’t think they’re being tested enough and that they know of a player who does take PED’s. Tennis better get on top of this and put more money into the testing the way baseball did.

    If fans didn’t care about who takes PED’s in baseball then why would McGwire, Canseco, Bonds and Clemens all be held out of the Hall of Fame?

    On another note, I took my son to train yesterday with Chris Lewitt, who wrote the book on Spanish tennis and how it rose from the 60’s and 80’s when there were really only a couple of slam winners from Spain, Orantes and Santana to the 90’s where all of a sudden you had all these top Spanish players, Bruguera, Moya, Corretja, Costa and now Nadal, Ferrer et al. And one thing the book points is that the Spaniards believe in training on clay with drills that are designed to build up a player’s legs and toughness. Well, it is a bit odd, you don’t have a slam winner in Spain from 1975 to 1993 and then all of a sudden, you have multiple slam winners and possibly the GOAT come from this country. Is it the players, the training or the PED-use behind this phoenix rise?

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 5, 2016 at 12:38 pm

    Dan I believe it’s mostly the media which votes for the Baseball Hall of Fame – has TV ratings or sponsorship or ticket sales gone down because of steroids controversies? Hardly – I agree with the legs factor in tennis – speed and leg stamina are vitally important – I believe that’s why I have had success in tennis as a late starter able to beat far more experienced and accomplished players – I have strong legs from years of hockey and years of squats and lunges in the gym and running and sprints plus a lot of basketball and deck hockey – I see a lot of good players from the belt up but without the legs it doesn’t matter how good you can serve and hit strokes – building up the legs is very important –

  • Hartt · October 5, 2016 at 12:59 pm

    I think a lot of fans do care about doping and would be truly shocked if one of their favourite players tested positive.

    Regarding Sharapova there have been a lot of reactions and they vary from those who totally support her, through people who think the reduced suspension is fair to those who think she should be out of tennis. I agree with Dan. Although I was never a fan I did think she was a good player. But knowing she was taking increased dosages of meldonium right before important matches, obviously to enhance her performance, means I have lost respect for her. If I didn’t root for her before definitely won’t be doing that in the future.

  • Hartt · October 5, 2016 at 1:06 pm

    Scoop, totally agree about how important strong legs are for tennis players. When I saw some of the WTA players practicing at Rogers Cup was struck by the shorter players like Suarez Navarro and Errani. They both have legs like tree trunks!

  • Dan Markowitz · October 5, 2016 at 2:25 pm

    Legs are important. What do you make of both Sock and Qball getting drilled by Zverev and Gasquet, respectively? Geez, Qball was up a set and he broke back in second and than got drilled. Sock just doesn’t have it, whatever he’s missing he doesn’t have. According to Spadea, he doesn’t have a brain, but I think there’s a lot more missing too.

    I didn’t see how SteveJo fared against Dimmy.

  • Hartt · October 5, 2016 at 2:34 pm

    I was rooting for Zverev in that match but was disappointed with how poorly Sock played – too many UFEs. I don’t know what his problem is.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 5, 2016 at 4:21 pm

    This might be an insult to porn stars, but doesn’t Steve Johnson look like a porn star with his ‘stache?

  • Scoop malinowski · October 5, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    Dan, there are only about twenty tennis players in the world better than Sock. Hes smart enough to be doing something right. Zverev is playing top ten ball now hes on fire. Dimitrov is rising now.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 5, 2016 at 7:23 pm

    Klein v Dancevic in Stockton, CA second round. Brydan qualied and then took out Halys 6-1 in the third. Klein is Mr. Emotional and Dancy is Mr. Cool. When you look at Frank the Tank’s career, it’s pretty amazing. The dude’s 32 now, ranked no. 267 and except for a couple of weeks in like 2014 and 2011 I think, he hasn’t been Top 100 since 2008! And yet, he’s still plying away with his game built for a different era, I guess thinking he might have one more Top 100 run left in him. He’s kind of the poor man’s Canadian Radek, but with a much hotter wife who he’s still married to.

  • Andrew Miller · October 5, 2016 at 7:24 pm

    Agree on Zverev etc. Maybe Sock, Stevej took vacation, haven’t seen their names pop up on results lists lately for daily matched. Rust is rust. They still may have lost, Zverev playing awesome and Gasquet played Davis cup so no rest for him.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 5, 2016 at 7:40 pm

    Frank The Tank (yes that’s his nickname – he said it in a Biofile) – is one of those unsung heroes who is still grinding it out just like Klein – these guys just wont quit – they still believe –

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 5, 2016 at 7:41 pm

    Believe Sock has been idle since US Open so he could be rusty – not a bad loss to Aye Zee –

  • Hartt · October 5, 2016 at 9:18 pm

    I like Stephanie Myles’ name for Dancevic better – “Fancy Frank.” He has been great about playing Davis Cup for Canada over the past few years. If Raonic or Pospisil (or both) is injured Frank does his part.

    But the best match I ever saw him play was a few years ago against a Spanish player – think it was Granollers – in Davis Cup. Frank was in the zone, he could do no wrong – even a guy on the Spanish bench applauded. Spain did not have their top players, however I think they thought Canada would be easy pickings. But they did not reckon on Frank at his very best.

  • Hartt · October 5, 2016 at 9:28 pm

    A great Dancevic story: at the AO the year it was even hotter than normal, it might have been last year, Dancevic passed out briefly, and claimed he saw Snoopy. Only Frank! 🙂

  • Dan Markowitz · October 5, 2016 at 10:39 pm

    Well, Klein I think is only 26 or 27 so it’s not like he’s been around as long as Frank. Mac Mac’s had a couple of nice weeks, beating Tiafoe and now Smyczek. How about the English renaissance in tennis with Murray, Edmunds and Evans. Didn’t see that coming.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 6, 2016 at 8:22 am

    Dancevic is a funny guy and a great intelligent inteview – I do remember that from when we did the Biofile at the US Open about ten years ago – the most memorable match I have of Frank was vs Sousa at US Open about three years ago and he lost a marathon 76 in the fifth and after qualifying he was absolutely fried and walking back to the locker room from court 4 no faster than a 90 year old and he was barefoot too he had taken off his socks and shoes – never forget that surreal sight – But Dancevic is dangerous when he gets on a roll and gets his confidence – he showed that this year in Newport winning two tough qualies matches and then Harrison in the first round and then the first set off eventual champion Karlovic and he lost both close sets to Karlovic after winning that first –

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 6, 2016 at 8:24 am

    Hartt: That’s as funny as when Andy murray said he had that dream the night before he won Wimbledon and he said he had a dream and he was playing against Denis Kudla in the dream – hilarious Andy 🙂

  • catherine bell · October 6, 2016 at 9:40 am

    Another underwhelming match from Simona. Thrashed in Wuhan, dumped out of Beijing 0-6 3-6 before QF. A habit of pointless OCCs. Seems over needy. Where’s all that self-belief harvested from Serena’s absence ?

    Not the performance you expect from someone in the top 5.
    And if she’s freewheeling before Singapore then that’s not admirable.

    Usual topsey turvey from WTA. Kerber too.

  • catherine bell · October 6, 2016 at 10:19 am

    Oh, and I’ve seen some comments which suggest that certain players aren’t bothering too much because they’ve already made the year end finals, and the $$$$

    They should be reminded that people actually pay to watch the rubbish served up in smaller tournaments and prizemoney is also offered, implying a responsibility on everyone’s part to do their best.

    This applies to men as well as women and has long been a complaint around tournaments after the US Open.

    (I know there are exceptions – gifted and committed players – it’s not those I’m thinking of)

  • Thomas Tung · October 6, 2016 at 10:25 am

    @CatherineBell: I think Halep’s problem (and it’s one she shares with a lot of players, both male and female) is that she is, in a way, too competitive. She needs too much to win, and thus starts playing “not to lose” tennis, rather than “playing to win” tennis. Just too tight out there. When Simona is relaxed, she plays just fine, but when she is tight, she plays like a Top 300 player. This “over-competitiveness” is much more easily seen on the women’s side.

    @DanMarkowitz: It seemed like Moya/Corretja were doing just fine in terms of Spain’s tennis potential, as they were more aggressive on the court than most of their fellow Spainards (especially Moya with the big serve/big forehand combo). It’s not like they were oppressively dominating the entire Tour out there, even during their good years. Even in their primes, they had a good number of bad losses. I personally think that Moya/Corretja weren’t on the PEDs, as they both had good indoor performances, notably during the 1998 year-end championships, when they played each other in the finals, having both survived tough SF matches (most year-round PED users experience a big drop-off of performance during the fall/winter months, as their doping cycle comes to an end).

  • catherine bell · October 6, 2016 at 10:57 am

    Thomas –

    It’s an interesting point and one we could debate endlessly I suppose. Two things strike me – one, Simona’s meltdowns can happen against players who don’t on paper provide serious competition for her, so the assumption must be that she does some serious underrating. What on earth does she and Cahill discuss on the practice court ? Why does she seem to depend on him so much ? She’s 25 and played pro tennis much of her life. She should be a little independent out there.
    (and those ill-advised remarks about Serena will always come back to haunt her when she flops – I was astonished that she gave away so much )

    More generally – what if super-competitiveness is grafted on to a personality which is not naturally inclined that way ? I can think of examples from the past. And indeed, as you suggest, mostly women.

  • Hartt · October 6, 2016 at 2:32 pm

    Agree that Simona is way too dependent on Cahill. He has said he wants to do fewer OCC sessions but the number does not seem to go down. But I would agree with the idea that, if anything, Simona is too anxious to win and that (along with being a perfectionist) actually gets in the way of her playing her best.

    I think the absolute worst thing players can do (if they are not injured) is not trying their best in a match. Tickets for tennis matches are not cheap and often going is a special treat for the fan. The least the players can do is give their best efforts. Even if they don’t have their best game for a match, they need to do the best they can that day. Anything less is showing a lack of respect for the fans, the game and even themselves.

  • catherine bell · October 6, 2016 at 4:24 pm

    Hartt-

    Agree Simona seems over-anxious and that inhibits her, but I must say I’m starting to wonder whether or not the source of the anxiety is located away from the tennis court.

    She almost admitted something like that herself once but really it’s none of our business – just hope it can get sorted.

    And I’m still sorry she didn’t go to Rio.

  • Doogie · October 6, 2016 at 5:22 pm

    I can imagine Spadea is right about Sock. But as a tennis player u dont need to be that smart.

    For example Thomas Muster, who has no brain at all (sorry to say but it is true).

    But he was smart enough (or just lucky) to hire a good coach and he just did what Leitgeb said to him. Muster did not think about what Leitgeb ordered him to do – he just made it. He became Nr 1 as u know.

    Jack has to do same – with a very good coach!

  • Hartt · October 6, 2016 at 7:11 pm

    In Sock’s defense he does have a good record in doubles – 6 titles including Wimbledon. He also has 2 big mixed doubles titles – the USO and this year’s Olympics.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 6, 2016 at 7:49 pm

    I think Halep is too introverted to be a “Face” of the sport or a major champion – just like Gasquet they are secondary players.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 6, 2016 at 7:50 pm

    Hartt: I know people who can watch the pros just practice all day – people like to see world class tennis especially played by the top stars –

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 6, 2016 at 7:53 pm

    Doogie: I totally disagree that muster is not a smart guy – no way – he is very smart and I know it because I did a biofile with him and observed many of his matches – he was a tricky clever player who got to no 1 in the world and was effective on all surfaces with the exception of grass perhaps – bright intelligent guy and a genius on the court – Only a genius of a player gets to be no 1 in the atp –

  • Andrew Miller · October 6, 2016 at 11:08 pm

    Muster was crazy. Crazy good and crazy. Loved that game.

    MacMac is better than I thought. Again I saw him practice and was less than impressed. But I noticed he has a lot of self belief. For a lightweight could serve him well.

    Simona…who knows. She does do herself in with the complaints about her elders. Trash talk doesn’t work for anyone other than Jimmy Connors.

    Maybe she needs to win fed cup or a dubs slam. That would bring her closer.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 6, 2016 at 11:33 pm

    I disagree with you, Doogie. I don’t think you can be a smart player just by following your coach’s game plan. The player still has to be the one to implement it and then make adjustments on the court. That takes smarts or at least tennis smarts.

    I guess a good coach can drill that thinking into a player’s mind, but at some point, the player has to have the confidence, ability and mindset to make it work.

    Mmoh is suddenly doing a lot of winning after getting crunched at the Open by Chardy. Geez, Tommy Paul might never make it back. He’s getting crushed, not just beaten. Wouldn’t it be surprising if after all the talk of Tiafoe and Kozlov and Paul that it’s Mmoh who forges ahead.

  • catherine bell · October 7, 2016 at 3:08 am

    Scoop –

    Agree Simona is a ‘secondary’ player – and yes, introverted or just inhibited. Would have worked by now, becoming a ‘face’ and it hasn’t. (Her defeat in Beijing wasn’t even covered as a story on tennis.com.)
    It’s possible at some level she recognises this – can’t be easy.

    Andrew – yes, Simona should play more doubles. Good way to get match practice, sharpen net game, make money – BJK understood that, still valid eras later.

    Her trash talk probably comes from naivete and maybe not knowing quite how her comments would sound in English.
    She probably knows now 🙂

    Connors always knew…

  • catherine bell · October 7, 2016 at 3:11 am

    BTW – good British Telegraph piece by Oliver Brown on Sharapova’s lack of shame 🙂

  • Dan Markowitz · October 7, 2016 at 7:53 am

    Sharpie is one player and person–even though I’ve never met her, but I feel I have a take on her from covering her all these years–that I really don’t like. Vince said she’s okay, he used to hang out with her and the Knicks’ Sasha Vujecic when they went together, but I’ll have to probe Vince more on this. She cheated. She knows she cheated and she has the gall to act as if the 15 months was a bad decision and she has zero culpability, Sharpie is a real head case. I know Hingis also dropped a few fiancées and a husband, and she also tested positive for PED’s, but I like Hingis a whole lot more than Sharpie, but maybe that’s because Hingis is always smiling and Sharpie walks around like she’s the Queen Bee.

    Personally, I haven’t missed Sharpie one bit. It’s not like her game is one I gravitate to, but then again, I could give a hoot about 7/8 of women’s tennis. I mean would you ever see a Mischa Zverev in women’s tennis? No way, not since Martina played and after she couldn’t dominate anymore I was never interested in the Davenport’s, Sele’s, Graf’s (somewhat with her), Capriati’s, and Clijsters and Williams’ who all seemed like clones of one another. Only Henin and Mauresmo to a little degree seemed to have any flair.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 7, 2016 at 8:47 am

    Mmoh is the one who has forged ahead in the last month – Fritz is still way ahead but he has points to defend this year and will in the first half of next year too – Tiafoe is steadily winning matches and right behind Fritz with Donaldson – Opelka had a breakout summer winning a lot of ATP matches and is probably the one with the biggest upside – Kozlov and Rubin are just a fraction behind the lead pack -it’s still a tight bunch and have to say right now Paul is the only one who has broken stride and has fallen back well off the pace – but one good tourney puts him right back with the lead pack –

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 7, 2016 at 8:50 am

    Doogie: No way can you suggest Muster was just a puppet taking and following the orders of a good coach – he was a free spirit and an Alpha Male type guy and player – Great great player who overachieved and beat all the odd which were stacked against –

  • Doogie · October 7, 2016 at 10:13 am

    @scoop:

    At some point of Musters career he decided to stop working with Leitgeb but after he failed to have success without him, he quickly went back to him.

    About adjustments on court? Tough to judge for me. He is like Nadal – if u say Rafa makes good adjustments – so was Muster. In my opinion both are just playing their style.

    Would u say Karlovic makes good adjustments because he reached Nr.14?? I would not as Rafa or Muster they play their game. Murray or Djoko or fed make good decisions on court – no doubt about them.

    But more I meant off court “intelligence”. Sorry to say scoop but Muster declearing as a very smart man (because of one interview?). Of course he learnt to give interviews and he was very sympathic in my view.

    Muster is/was never in talks about coaching a good player or even a less good player because the tour knows him as a warrior and not a tactial guy or technic guy.

    Please ask Spadea (who I rate high in intelligant way) about Musters off court “brain”. I am quite sure he is on my side.

  • Hartt · October 7, 2016 at 11:57 am

    Dan, am a little confused by your “Mischa Zverev” reference. Mikhail Zverev is 29 years old and a journeyman player currently ranked at about 133. Are you thinking of his younger brother Sascha?

  • Hartt · October 7, 2016 at 12:02 pm

    Catherine, had read the Telegraph piece and really enjoyed it because I agree with what he wrote. One annoying thing is a lot of people will only see Sharapova’s TV interviews and believe everything she says.

    And I agree with Dan, I did not miss her at all. He and I have different views on women’s tennis; I generally enjoy it. But it is time for some of the younger players to step up.

    I must have missed the disparaging comments that Simona made. What did she say?

  • Hartt · October 7, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    To open a whole new can of worms, did people see the Nadal vs. Dimitrov match? I respect Rafa as a top player but am not a die hard fan. But still was shocked at how Grigor won in SS. Outside of the fact that Rafa was far from his best, are their any thoughts about the match?

  • catherine bell · October 7, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    Hartt-

    I referred to Simona’s comments on a previous thread – ‘Double Standard’ – she said basically that now Serena’s not winning everyone else can have a go – which in itself isn’t anything out of the way and I don’t think particularly disparaging, but what gobsmacked me slightly was Simona’s additional suggestion that her own self-belief depended on Serena’s absence. Several people noticed this on various sites and drew the obvious conclusion.

    I’ve never heard anyone active in any sport say something quite so revealing of their fragile state of mind, and I did wonder if Simona realised what it sounded like, or if she truly meant it that way.

    (I really don’t think she’s the kind of person who’d indulge in ‘trash talk’)

    On recent evidence Simona simply isn’t going to win against stronger players with her current game or mental outlook – she has to change and that’s a huge challenge.

    BTW – I talk a bit about Simona because players with flaws have always interested me – even if it means a roller coaster ride 🙂

    Rafa – didn’t see the match but he’s getting on and will have ups and downs I imagine.

  • Andrew Miller · October 7, 2016 at 3:06 pm

    I’m fine with Sharpie. Did the crime and paying the time. I also like her more for her guts than her game. It’s not beautiful but she’s rode it to count it five slams? Five I think. I think it’s funny also about the cold persona, but listen there are tons of lunies who probably luv her and hate her viscerally who she needs to keep at bay. Best way is to be cold. Plus who didn’t empathize with Sharpie following her us open title. She makes this major effort time be a slam champ there takes the mike thanks her dad on the loudspeaker and then the cameras zoom on him and he’s distracted and talking via his cell phone apparently unaware his daughters saying thanks dad, not reciprocating or anything, just riding his daughter’s coat tails. If you don’t like Sharpie, be sure time extend that courtesy to sharpie senior.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 7, 2016 at 6:50 pm

    You’re seeing something very interesting with the Young American guns: Rubin, Mmoh, Tiafoe and Mac Mac, none of them might be 6-1. Mmoh is listed as 6-1 and Tiafoe as 6-2, but I doubt that (Rubin and Mac Mac are listed as 5-10). But these guys are having bigger success than taller players: Paul, Krueger, Kraijcek, and even Opelka, at least recently. In Rubin and Mac Mac you might have the first small players do well in the US since Chang and Agassi and Spadea if you want to put him in that category.

  • Hartt · October 7, 2016 at 7:01 pm

    The 4 players that Dan mentioned are the final 4 at the Stockton Challenger – Rubin plays Mmoh, and Tiafoe is against McDonald. Frank Dancevic had been defeated by Rubin.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 7, 2016 at 7:18 pm

    You can’t convince me that Muster was not a super bright guy and on court tactical genius – All the best players in tennis are clever chess players who know where to hit the ball and how to hit the ball – top level tennis requires thinking – lots of thinking –

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 7, 2016 at 7:20 pm

    Wonder what the usually outspoken Navratilova is saying about Sharapova as Navratilova was a big suspect of using steroids and PEDs –

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 7, 2016 at 7:23 pm

    Hartt: Didn’t see Grigor beat Nadal but was told by colleague Richard Pagliaro at Tennisnow that Super G was ripping his forehands and Rafa was leaving lots of short balls – Rafa battled hard to the end but Super G earned the valuable win – it was strange that Rafa was subpar today after looking so good the previous round but full credit to Super G –

  • Andrew Miller · October 7, 2016 at 7:25 pm

    Two good weeks in row for mmoh macmac. Maybe they have what it takes.

1 2 3

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com
To top