Tennis Prose




Dec/16

6

Ryan Harrison Analyzes His Comeback Surge in 2016

104 Comments · Posted by Scoop Malinowski in Bios

images

By Scoop Malinowski

Ryan Harrison reached his career high ranking of ATP No. 43 back in 2012 at the age of 20 but then lost his way over the last couple of years, mysteriously dropping outside the top 100. After a difficult start in 2016 which featured several disappointing first half of the year losses, Harrison suddenly rejuvenated his career with a surge of fine play in Washington DC. After posting several impressive wins Harrison initiated his best hot streak in years and was able to break back into the top 100. The 24-year-old now will have a direct entry into the Australian Open main draw. Last week at IMG Academy in Bradenton, FL, the soon-to-be married Harrison (late March 2017/Lauren Mchale) analyzed how he was able to turn his season and career around in 2016 and also touched on what he’s working on now to continue his ascent up the ATP World Tour rankings…

Scoop Malinowski: You got your career back on track in 2016, you had an excellent second half of 2016. What was the turning point for you?

Ryan Harrison: Starting the hard court season for me was always going to be something that I was looking forward to, just being an American and playing the US Open Series, I was able to kick it off right away in DC qualifying and make the third round. I think it was mental mostly. Just really putting myself in a position where regardless of score, regardless of what was happening throughout the match, that I was going to be tuned in the whole time. Some of those matches where I was getting down the early break or getting up and early break and giving it back, whatever sort of situation that you’d face that could kind of throw you off course. In my previous matches I’ve been letting it kind of shake me a little bit. I feel like I did a really good job the second half of the year of just staying through whatever situation of a match came about. I just stayed solid and stay mentally tough.

Scoop: So was there one specific match where the confidence came back?

Ryan Harrison: Yeah, I think the Troicki match in DC. I beat him in a real tough, hour-and-a-half-long first set 7-6 where I think I had like 12 or 13 break points which I didn’t capitalize on and I still won the set. I remember thinking I always play Victor tough, I played him three or four times that I knew I was going to have an opportunity play him tough because of our previous match history. Once I got off that match I just said if I can really play every match with the same sort of intensity that I have today and I’m going to give myself a chance to win a lot of matches if I beat him and he’s top 30 the world just doing that all the time and I know that there’s no reason why I can’t do that when I’m not playing him. I’m like, okay, I need to bring that every day and that will bring consistency in results and it did.

Scoop: Last year looked like you could have been playing better than you were when you were 40 in the world. Is that accurate?

Ryan Harrison: Yeah, definitely. If you looked at where I was in the second half of the year and how I played even after the Open, even before the Open in Toronto and DC I definitely felt like that could be accurate. My ranking is up to 90 right now which the ranking system is kind of reflective over 12 months so I guess we’ll see in June if I’m up to the top 40 or whatever or where I’ll be at hopefully. I truly feel if I continue to be as consistent as I was last for five months then I’ll be up around there and hopefully move forward. But for me, like I said, it was just a matter of consistent results.

Scoop: What was the best match you played last season?

Ryan Harrison: The biggest win was definitely the Raonic match at the Open. That was the biggest win. Had some really quality matches, even in a couple of losses. I lost four in the third round of Toronto to Berdych and we had an absolute battle. Playing a really quality first round match of Toronto against Andrey Kuznetsov, who’s top 40, and I beat him very comfortably. All in all I think that probably the Raonic match was one of the most gratifying ones. Just because it was the top four player at a slam. I hadn’t really had a big result like that a slam yet.

Scoop: What are you working on right now to take the next step in your game?

Ryan Harrison: Transition. My ground game and my overall serving and returning has been solid but now I’m trying to start to build toward more of an aggressive play. Because now that I’m playing against those guys in the top 20 in the world pretty frequently again you can’t expect to get wins over those guys on a consistent basis unless you have actual weapons. You can win every now and then if you’re playing reactive kind of tennis where you’re waiting to see what they do but in order to really put up consistent results it needs to be on your terms. So I’m working on using my ability to transition to the net. I can use my athleticism to my advantage.

Scoop: You seemed quicker last year than you ever. You’re court movement was clearly better. How did that happen?

Ryan Harrison: Well, you know, playing a lot of matches makes you faster just because you can’t really simulate that match intensity (in practice). And I had to play a lot of qualifying matches, that’s just because I was playing a lot of tournament qualies. I’m getting two to three matches in every week before the main draw even starts. So every Saturday Sunday I’m playing matches, playing matches and I end up playing four to five matches a week especially over US Open Series and all that heat, it’s hard not to get fit when you’re playing that many matches. So that was a big step as far as just playing a lot of tennis and then after that the little things come into play. If you were playing a lot of matches and you’re in a tournament it’s really easy to be on top of your diet because you know that you’re playing on a schedule… I’m going to wake up, I’m eating breakfast at this time, I’m eating lunch at this time, and then if I win we have to have a healthy dinner because we’re going to do it again tomorrow. So it’s kind of funny because I don’t know comes first, the chicken or the egg, because if you do all the things right and you have good results, once you’re having good results it becomes easier to do all the things right because you have to do it to stay on track. So I felt like the last four months for me we’re, day in and day out, I felt like I knew what I was going to get out of my game. Now going into the off-season I’m taking what I know I’m gonna have as far as the serve and the return and the consistent ground game. I’m building on top of that as far as making myself more comfortable at the net and transitioning.398374_10150503152526370_1718839495_a

104 comments

  • Coach Skelly · December 6, 2016 at 8:04 pm

    Great interview wit Harrison!!!

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 6, 2016 at 8:07 pm

    Thanks Coach – I have interviewed Harrison since the beginning of his career and he was then and still is now one of the top 3 ATP interviews in all of tennis – Kid always delivers gold content – he also shared excellent insights about Facing Andy which is going to be tennis book #6 to be published in July 2017 –

  • Andrew Miller · December 6, 2016 at 9:33 pm

    Scoop, no dubs or confidence tank questions?! Shocked. That said good on him. He has pushed it and puts stock in playing.

  • Scoop malinowski · December 6, 2016 at 10:31 pm

    Andrew: i did ask Ryan about when his (lost) confidence was restored. His answer covered it. DC and Toronto. Doubles was not on his 2016 agenda. I had to be brief because we did this QA and also a QA about Facing Murray. Total time of both interviews was 13 minutes.

  • Andrew Miller · December 7, 2016 at 12:20 am

    Scoop, I am kidding. It is great. There is a lot to tennis and that’sa tribute to the Dan-Scoop approach that the site picks up on changes in the tennis players and their psyche, or narratives that daily reporters dont see because they dont focus on the sport. To me Harrison comeback, and really the Harrison brothers return as well as Zverev boys, one of best stories this year. Big loss in Newport, has a chat with his team that says lets work together, plays dc, plays dubs, plays the tennis league and all of the sudden Boom.he is back. Fortunes change quick in the sport and this ome is rewarding.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 7, 2016 at 7:52 am

    Agree Andrew that the Harrison rejuvenation has been a big story in tennis this year and largely uncovered – everyone was on Andy Djokovic and Delpo – media does not put enough emphasis on the whole picture –

  • catherine bell · December 7, 2016 at 8:14 am

    Scoop

    Coverage of stories in the media depends a lot on space available, popularity of the sport, interests of the editor etc as I’m sure you know, so many interesting things end up spiked or never written about.

    Magazines used to publish a wider range of articles but no longer – lack of advertising now means many mags have disappeared or grown much smaller.
    Internet is fine but tennis sites are very fragmented.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 7, 2016 at 8:41 am

    Catherine: I know the big outlets feature the big stars mostly and the magazines are under pressure to sell – Tennis Week always defied the typical formula though it was not a big seller and the wealthy publisher could afford to disregard the bottom line for the sake of creativity and personal interest and non traditional story preferences – I would rather re-read an old TW issue than look at a brand new issue of any current mag –

  • catherine bell · December 7, 2016 at 10:15 am

    Scoop –

    Certainly agree – TW was very good value in that regard and fortunate in its publisher.

    Our mag was a bit like that but not from any particular interest or generosity on the part of the publisher – as long as we didn’t get sued and kept to his idea of a budget (ie zero) we could print what we liked. He never read it anyway 🙂

    O for the good old days.

  • Hartt · December 7, 2016 at 1:56 pm

    Scoop, a very enjoyable interview. Harrison is so articulate in the way he analyzes his season and his game. Two things stood out for me. Once again, how crucial the mental aspect of tennis is. The other is how useful playing a lot of qualies can be, getting the match play that cannot be replicated in practice. And a good argument for why wild cards can be detrimental rather than helpful for young players. It will be interesting to see how Harrison’s 2017 season unfolds.

  • Hartt · December 7, 2016 at 2:08 pm

    The discussion about media coverage of tennis reminds me of one of my pet peeves – doubles gets no respect! Even the tennis websites give doubles short shrift.

    What got me thinking about this today was a piece on the Tennis Canada website where they review some of the Canadian stories of 2016. One was how Daniel Nestor, at age 44, won 3 titles this season, bringing his total to 91. He was also runner up (with Stepanek) at the AO, losing to J. Murray/Soares. (This must be strange for Stepanek, having a partner even older than he is.) Nestor has won at least 1 title per year for 23 years straight. That is simply amazing, especially since he has every Slam and Masters going. Danny has also participated in 6 Olympics, winning one gold medal. And his Davis Cup participation record is, I think, second only to Paes.

    This should be a big story, but of course is not looked at whatsoever. (Outside of Tennis Canada)

  • catherine bell · December 7, 2016 at 2:44 pm

    Hartt –

    This comes up every now and again and I think the answer is always the same – there’s no media interest in doubles because only truly dedicated fans such as yourself really follow the event and, as Scoop pointed out, magazines and websites prefer to feature the big stars and build reader numbers which attract advertising.

    Tennis much more fan driven now than I remember – result of social media, celebrity culture etc probably, and you can easily see, looking on various websites, the stories which attract comment and those which don’t.

    It’s a shame, but that’s the way in sport now. You can continue being a doubles fan though and keep us up to date 🙂

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 7, 2016 at 2:52 pm

    Thank Hartt – Harrison is up there with the very best regarding ATP interviews – very intelligent and he gives interesting insights – he will be an ace TV analyst in the future – I predict an even better year for Harrison – he will continue right where he left off in 17 and continue to knock off big name players such as Raonic – I predict top 30 for Harrison –

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 7, 2016 at 2:55 pm

    Hartt: Love doubles and also mixed doubles and yes Daniel Nestor is indeed a big story and an ignored one – Doubles deserves more TV time and more media coverage – Nestor is showing no signs of hanging it up either as right now he is battling in IPTL and it looks like he’s still enjoying his career as much as any pro player out there –

  • Hartt · December 7, 2016 at 8:25 pm

    It is the old chicken and egg problem. Doubles is rarely shown so people don’t become interested in it and because of lack of interest it is not shown. A shame, because people often say how much they enjoy watching doubles when they do see it (almost by accident sometimes).

    On opencourt.ca Steph Myles has some good news about Nestor. He is scheduled to play both Brisbane and AO with Roger-Vasselin. The team had good results in 2015 when R-V’s normal partner, Benneteau, was unavailable. Nestor and Roger-Vasselin played together twice in 2016 (Washington and Antwerp), winning both titles.

    Earlier Danny had said he may play less in 2017 but as you say Scoop, he is not showing any signs of slowing down.

  • Andrew Miller · December 7, 2016 at 11:43 pm

    Big outlets do a pretty good jobs – I think the NYT does excellent work with its US Open blog and with Christopher Clarey, Wash Post’s coverage for the local tournament is great including reporting on Tiafoe, ESPN tennis is very good, SI Jon Wertheim’s mailbag and his Beyond the Baseline podcast are excellent, Tennis.com’s work, all very good.

    Point is they can only cover so much. Even the players themselves aren’t completely aware of the things working in their favor or why. Example – Harrison himself. He didn’t get a chance to talk about himself, but we have to think that seeing his brother get back on his feet and qualify for the US Open alongside Harrison was as big a moment for Ryan Harrison as it was for Christian Harrison. Or the fact that Ryan Harrison played a HECK of a lot of tennis this summer – not just the qualies and singles, but doubles, the World Team Tennis events for the winning team in the league (both singles and doubles for the short formats). He really pushed and then found himself fine tuning a lot of his game.

    And he was happy off the court AND on it as well, really seemed to absorb the crowd’s support.

    Point I’m trying to make – there are the standard variables such as the player’s focus, ability to executive, improvement on court, rapport with coach, etc. But then there are the other things – appreciation for the tournaments, being inspired by the young tennis generation of Americans breathing down everyone’s neck – who knows – familiarity with different tournaments, having a better schedule, having friends on the tour like Novikov etc.

    When things are going well, a LOT OF SMALL THINGS ARE GOING WELL TOO.

  • Andrew Miller · December 7, 2016 at 11:45 pm

    What I’m saying on the media is that I think big media outlets in US and UK and Australia cover the sport well. But the hometown papers, not so much. Tennis is rarely a draw for most local papers.

    That’s why the blogs matter so much – whether it’s this one or mailbag at SI.com etc. Plus there’s the sense here that the writers know the players. Others do too like Doug Robson, who I think has a good eye for the sport.

  • Andrew Miller · December 7, 2016 at 11:47 pm

    Yes, I think 99 percent of tennis writers miss the doubles point literally. They don’t get it – they cover it like garbage and don’t get it. They don’t see the relationship between the singles side of things and the doubles side. THey don’t get that if a player loses but then wins a doubles match that it’s a win and the tournament isn’t a loss.

    Yeah, I guess just overall missing it.

  • catherine bell · December 8, 2016 at 4:01 am

    Andrew

    Another point in this interminable argument about doubles exposure is that many tennis writers, I’d say all nowadays on papers, don’t just cover tennis and may not be that familiar with doubles – so it’s easy for them to pass by.

    And believe me, and as an editor in the past I was involved in all this, the majority of tennis followers do not rate doubles as the main attraction. All else follows from that. Doubles is a dilution – interesting and fun for those who play and know about the game but a sideshow for the rest.

    We used to cover doubles at W’don because a contributor was an enthusiast and wrote the stories but doubles never made it to other tournament coverage and no one ever complained.
    (There was once a pro doubles tournament in the US – does anyone remember it ? Might have been in Dallas)

    There is actually a lot of tennis out there in blogs and websites but some of it is pretty unoriginal and/or superficial. I don’t share your enthusiasm for tennis.com – it used be much better – I find it shallow and repetitious. But that’s presumably what the browsing readers want. A tiny proportion of those ever comment. I like tennis-prose and maybe lots of people read it but only about 9 or ten people regularly post – and that’s out of the entire internet world 🙂

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 8, 2016 at 9:07 am

    Doubles will be a sideshow until the big stars play it regularly – All we can do is keep watching and talking about it and doing interviews with the doubles players which we will do and I will post a doubles biofile next week with a player who played WTF doubles two weeks ago –

  • catherine bell · December 8, 2016 at 11:44 am

    Scoop –

    Agree – but I’m afraid my crystal ball says big stars will never return to doubles and it will continue to be the province of specialists.

    Hope I’m wrong but fear not.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 8, 2016 at 12:17 pm

    Never say never. Can see Federer and Nadal playing more Grand Slam doubles after their singles prowess declines. And I can see both becoming doubles forces It would be a good idea to promote doubles… if Federer and Nadal could be enticed to play doubles when they are no longer threats to win major singles titles.

  • Dan Markowitz · December 8, 2016 at 3:22 pm

    Spadea looked at doubles players as a nuisance. They hogged all the free massage time at the tournaments. They were wannabe singles players who couldn’t cut it. He would play doubles I remember at the Open, once with Nick Massu, but he didn’t give it his all. I think most singles players for the most part feel the same way, that doubles is almost like a consolation and not worth their full effort.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 8, 2016 at 3:48 pm

    Just interviewed Ashley Fisher for Facing Andy Murray (he played a very young Andy twice in doubles in 2006) and he said something interesting about this – a lot of the top singles stars don’t try to take over a doubles match but Andy did have that hunger – Spadea could be part right too though as maybe the prominent singles players are basically coasting / floating through doubles most of the time unless of course they get to a final or it’s the Olympics or a masters series –

  • Hartt · December 8, 2016 at 4:34 pm

    I do read tennis.com every day because they are one of the few tennis sites that does have regular articles, but I agree with Catherine that many of the pieces there are shallow or repetitious. I understand that they are delivering what is popular but I can happily have a break from posts about Rafa, Novak, Fed, and even Andy.

    But today a tennis.com article does include Mahut finishing the season at No. 1 in doubles – the only French player to ever achieve this in either singles or doubles! The article is a look at some of the stories that got overlooked – wish they would do more of those.

  • Andrew Miller · December 8, 2016 at 10:25 pm

    I read all the stuff I can. Admit it we all need tennis dot com and espn tennis and the british tennis writers. They help out for tennis and we need MORE of it, not less.

  • Andrew Miller · December 8, 2016 at 10:31 pm

    BORIS BECKER SMACKS DJOKOVIC. Not really, but after parting ways with Djokovic or finding himself demoted or firing his charge or whatever, I thought it was interesting that Becker said that Djokovic didn’t keep up his top level practicing after winning the French Open.

    In other words he got complacent and found himself behind. Becker said that’s the way it goes and he loves Djokovic.

    All this from tennis.com 🙂

  • Andrew Miller · December 8, 2016 at 10:33 pm

    Yes, I enjoyed wannable dubs players such as Sveta Kuznetsova, Isner, Federer and Miryni. They all sucked.

    Dan, sometimes I think Spadea just says stuff that he likely believes but that isn’t the comprehensive view of the sport. I’ve seen top players play dubs and players considered scrubs and one way or the other it’s still tennis and it’s still professional.

    On tv it isn’t awesome but live it’s excellent.

  • catherine bell · December 9, 2016 at 3:56 am

    Andrew –

    I read about Becker and Djokovic but not on tennis.com – I picked it up from the British press. So perhaps we’re lucky in the coverage we get here. It’s more critical but maybe that’s a legacy from other sports such as cricket and football which tend to be more lively and air their scandals and controversies.

    On the whole I find tennis coverage a bit bland. There’s a sense that no one wants to offend the players or the WTA/ATP and I don’t think this makes for good or even realistic stories. More like PR.

    I don’t want to harp on the past but there was a time when there was more freedom – before tennis became so focussed around $$$$ and managed and also more defensive.

    Doubles – maybe Billie Jean was the last really top player, apart from Martina, to take doubles seriously – she played with Rosie Casals for eight years and I think one of her reasons for entering every event was that, with fewer big tournaments in those days, doubles gave her on-court time and got her match tight.

    Top men players deserted doubles earlier.

  • catherine bell · December 9, 2016 at 5:00 am

    Doubles – I forgot McEnroe and Fleming as example of top male player in doubles and I also now remember Mac saying he played doubles to keep him sharp since he was no great enthusiast for regular training and practice.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 9, 2016 at 7:34 am

    Did you see some of the dubs in IPTL with Dodig diving into practically the netpost to save a rally? Incredble effort level in IPTL dubs – Rojer Flo Dodig Verdasco Cuevas Nestor going all out – totally refuting Spadea allegation – I love IPTL – Kurumi Nara bageled Ivanovic / Hingis who subbed for her at 0-3 –

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 9, 2016 at 7:37 am

    I wonder when doubles first began to be downsized in pro tennis? Was it always a sideshow afterthought for singles also rans?

  • catherine bell · December 9, 2016 at 8:05 am

    Scoop –

    I think the downsizing began when the top ranked players stopped playing regularly – I couldn’t pinpoint the year but it was probably in the late 70s.
    Previously doubles always was important at GS events and also for men Davis Cup was a great impetus.

    As I mentioned above, BJK played doubles and won titles and she was hardly a singles also ran – Tony Roche also played, Margaret Court – many of her titles were in doubles and mixed. You can always check the records to see who played.
    Singles just became more specialised and fan oriented and the singles players attracted more money/attention and TV time.

  • Hartt · December 9, 2016 at 8:24 am

    Scoop, I came to post that everyone should see that IPTL doubles with Baghdatis/Melo and Dodig/F. Lopez. What terrific tennis! I saw the highlights and then found the youtube video of the whole thing. That dive by Dodig was something else, and then he lay on the court, watched his ball go over the net and looked like he was getting ready to continue playing.

    As Robbie K. said: “A simply incredible set of tennis from all 4 players. What a way to showcase our sport.”

  • catherine bell · December 9, 2016 at 9:50 am

    Hartt –

    Pity that IPTL looks so shaky for the future when they have such good matches.
    However, don’t think you’d see that level in regular tournaments – it’s as if when the pressure’s off it frees players – although some DC doubles have been pretty good.

    By the way – was just reading about the new report on Russian doping – makes you wonder about tennis…

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 9, 2016 at 10:15 am

    Incredible wasn’t it Hartt? I only saw the highlights and got the players mixed up – Incredible that these players are diving around in a supposed exo league -IPTL is great GREAT tennis – I realized that when seeing Hewitt the first year doing fist pumps and yelling come on with as much intensity as if it was a major final – IPTL is GREAT and let’s hope it does not go belly up –

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 9, 2016 at 10:17 am

    Catherine let’s hope in our lifetimes that tennis decides to upsize doubles and mixed doubles 🙂

  • catherine bell · December 9, 2016 at 11:00 am

    Scoop –

    I like mixed doubles – but the women need to be pretty good standard players.
    Rosie C used to partner Nastase – that was fun.

  • Hartt · December 9, 2016 at 12:43 pm

    I was pleasantly surprised during the first time the IPTL was played at how good much of the tennis was. The players are taking their matches seriously. It’s great fun seeing some of the former greats like Moya, who can still play well.

    And, as a fan of doubles, love the way doubles and mixed doubles are featured. I hope the league can continue in the future, despite the obvious financial challenges.

  • Hartt · December 9, 2016 at 12:48 pm

    Some interesting news about Denis Shapovalov. He will be doing some training in Spain with Gunter Bresnik, after working with him briefly earlier this fall. Denis’ regular coach, Adriano Fuorivia, encouraged him to make the change. It would be marvelous if Bresnik did become Denis’coach, what a way to get established in the pros.

  • catherine bell · December 9, 2016 at 12:53 pm

    Yes, I’d like to see the League continue, but India puts most of its (at present slightly dicey) money into cricket which is the big sport on the subcontinent.

    I think the players do perform seriously but somewhere in their heads is the idea that it’s not a GS or anything so they hit out accordingly

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 9, 2016 at 1:03 pm

    Shapovalov working with Bresnik and training daily with Thiem can only be fruitful for all involved. Andy went to Spain for a while as a teen and that sure worked out well for him.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 9, 2016 at 1:04 pm

    Verdasco is just bludgeoning every ball in IPTL singles – ferocious violent tennis.

  • Scoop Malinowski · December 9, 2016 at 1:07 pm

    There is I believe a pretty hefty cash reward for the winning team. That could be a factor in the high intensity level of the high quality tennis we are seeing. Any player who goes over there expecting a soft light level of exo tennis is in for a rude awakening. If Spadea ever gets invited to IPTL he better be prepared to rock and roll or he will get sent home early with a one way ticket.

  • Andrew Miller · December 9, 2016 at 1:43 pm

    Robbie rocks. Id like to see tennis reporting and writing awards for print radio and blogging. I think the aussies brits and south africans would win radio. But us reporters , and writers i think would win a tennis blogging award.

  • Andrew Miller · December 9, 2016 at 1:47 pm

    No i dont see djokovic returning to dominance. He has it in him to slam in 2017, but it is a taller order. He has an x on his back and opponents are sharks so i think he is perceived as still incredible and more mortal, which is how the slow unraveling of nadal federer and any champion takes place. Especially if you dont practice enough to stay on top. But you know fortunes change quick in the sport and a masters or davis cup win could do.the trick, as much for raonic as djokovic.

    I still believe that when you dump excellent coaches you decline. I dont care who it is a player relies on others to get top rankings and when those teams fall apart the player tumbles also.

  • Andrew Miller · December 9, 2016 at 1:48 pm

    And doubles needs on the ground reporting. We ought to.have a reward or award for writing on dubs.

  • Andrew Miller · December 9, 2016 at 1:50 pm

    Anyone that does what thiem did in off season just like shapovalov is doing and murray and djokovic before them does well in the next year. Verdasco trained hard before 2009 breakout.

  • catherine bell · December 9, 2016 at 1:53 pm

    Scoop –

    If the cash is so good why did Serena and Federer bail out ?

    Andrew – Us, win a tennis blogging award ? 🙂 LOL.

  • Hartt · December 9, 2016 at 2:17 pm

    Miomir Kermanovic continues his fine play, beating Rudolf Mulleker 6-3, 7-5 to make the SF at the Orange Bowl. He also has a doubles match with partner Ben Sigouin today.

1 2 3

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com
To top