Tennis Prose




Aug/12

5

Spectacular Andy Murray Conquers Federer To Win Olympic Gold Medal


Andy Murray played the match of his life today and dominated Roger Federer to win the first major title of his professional career, the Olympic gold medal, 61 62 64.

Federer looked typically sharp early but Murray had an answer for everything and just wasn’t going to be denied today.

Murray’s game, movement, serve and composure were better than ever and he was able to escape unscathed from the few tricky junctures in the match.

Federer’s play and tactics did not vary much despite falling two sets down, as the tennis legend seemed to sense and understand his fate on this day. Federer can still be satisfied with a Olympic silver medal in singles, which is a special accomplishment in it’s own right. (Did you see how important the bronze medal was for the teary-eyed Juan Martin Del Potro?)

This was Andy Murray’s long-awaited breakout moment. Nothing in the world was going to stop him from winning the Olympic gold medal in London, England. Absolutley nothing. Not even the imposing presence of the greatest player of all time, in the midst of one of the best stretches of his illustrious career.

Now the stage is set for Murray to capitalize on this remarkable achievement and take his potential to the next level – by winning the biggest events in tennis.

Murray is now in better position than ever before to change the upper ATP hierarchy, and win major titles. Much like Amelie Mauresmo, who won the Australian Open and Wimbledon titles soon after she won her first big singles title – the year end WTA championships.

Congratulations to Andy Murray for such a memorable performance today.

57 comments

  • Thomas Tung · August 5, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    Congratulations to Andy Murray! In a way, that was one of the most bizarre matches I’ve ever seen. It was as if Federer could do (almost) no right, and Murray, no wrong, on the court today. Looked like I was watching the hand of fate move against Federer today; it was deciding in favor of Murray, that this was not just a great day for Andy, but for tennis in the UK, that they would have a champion in a major tennis event this year. The big ace on match point told it all for me. This, coming from Andy Murray? ‘Nuff said.

  • Steve · August 5, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    Murray served well and hit many backhand winners down the line. Why Fed chose to attack Murray’s better side all day I’m not sure. 750 ATP points are a nice bonus but it leaves the sour Scot at #4 in the world with a unique strange career feat: winning at Wimbledon without ever winning Wimbledon. In the end Murray played better today.

    Haas/Dolgo should be good!

  • Mitch · August 5, 2012 at 4:09 pm

    Murray played brilliantly and Fed was not as sharp as he was in the Wimbledon final. Probably a combination of mental and physical fatigue, windy conditions and Murray’s dominance. Maybe instead of following in Mauresmo’s footprints, he’ll take a page from Djokovic’s book and go on an extreme tear. Wonder what the top 4 rankings will look like at the end of the year. Is Del Potro a threat again?

  • Andrew Miller · August 5, 2012 at 4:09 pm

    Well done by Murray. Reminds of Capriati beating Graf way back when for the Gold.

  • dan markowitz · August 5, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    How much of an effect to do you think the Olympic finals was played outdoors? Fed played both Djokovic and Murray at Wimbledon indoors, even the Benneteau match was played indoors. I’ve got to think Fed got a big advantage. I don’t think you will see him win a slam outside of Wimby ever again.

  • Steve · August 5, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    Dan you last time you counted Fed you were, as usual, dead wrong. Fed is a threat at the US Open. Also, Delpo when playing is best is much better than Murray at his best who Fed beat. The US Open isn’t the fastest surface but it’s fast enough for Fed to win it. I believe he’s won it 5 or 6 times and was in the semis last year and lost a close battle. Fed did look tired today. Too much tennis.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 5, 2012 at 11:40 pm

    Thomas, Murray played the match of his life and he picked the right time to do it. Fed was Fed but Murray was just not going to lose today. THis is the beginning, the Andy Murray reign may have just commenced.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 5, 2012 at 11:41 pm

    Murray will win Wimbledon someday, no doubt about it. And he’ll win some of the other majors too. The best is yet to come.

  • Steve · August 5, 2012 at 11:51 pm

    Well, if he catches Djoker & Fed again on off days he’ll have a chance.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 6, 2012 at 12:38 am

    Steve, Maybe Murray was so on and so good that if forced Djok and Fed to have an off day ) I thought Fed looked as good as ever vs. Delpo and early in the match today, but Murray refused to buckle, he refused to lose. Murray played the match of his life and just wasn’t going to be denied. Fed seemed to understand and was resigned to his fate today.

  • Andrew Miller · August 6, 2012 at 1:15 am

    Murray as slam champ is not a given. He looked awesome out there (I’ve never seen him play better), but a slam is best of five for every match, not just finals. As Andre Agassi said on his final day as a Wimbledon competitor, “if tennis was as easy as phoning in the results, you know, I would have just called in a win today […], you know. Just doesn’t happen that way. You have to come out; you have to do it. That’s one thing that I keep speaking to in competition, you know. The competitor’s heart and mind leave a lot of room for a lot of things that we might think is crazy to happen.”

    I think Murray will win a slam, because he’s showed he can make the final and make a final of it – but my thinking means nothing in the real scheme of things. Murray has to keep fighting the good fight and keep pushing, like Nadal, to overthrow the Nadal-Djokovic-Federer trio. I don’t think time is on his side either. He’s the best player to never slam but that does not make him a slam champion.

    I think playing some more doubles in non-slam tournaments might be a way for him to stay sharp in the volleys though.

    As for Federer and “can he win a slam if its not indoors” – I believe 100 percent he would have beaten Murray at Wimbledon this year even if it were outdoors. The fact the roof closed means Murray didnt have a prayer – the improbable (beating him in a slam final) became almost impossible (beating him indoors).

    As for predicting any future slam winners, for me it’s like when you cross an elephant with a rhino.

    (h)el(l)-if-i-know. I am awful for prediction. Please dont give me any vegas money I will lose it for you.

    Federer might win another slam – he’s easily one of the best hardcourt players of all time, otherwise he would lose before the semifinals on a slam hardcourt and he hasn’t done that since what, 2003? Almost ten years ago? If Djokovic keeps slumping, Nadal stays hurt, and Murray doesn’t improve, U.S. Open – with its fifth set tiebreaks – could be another slam for Federer.

    Though I have no idea who WILL win a slam, I just know who I’d like to see slam. I think Tsonga has a slam in him. Murray if for anything to show that hard work pays off even if your name is not Nadal or Djokovic. If Murray gets better, Nadal stays hurt, and Djokovic keeps up his slumping Murray could be the future #1 within a year.

    On the WTA side, wouldn’t mind seeing Lisicki win. I like Kirilenko too – she’s shown some grit. But I think Serena’s going to lock up the U.S. Open. Maybe Kimmie will end with a slam.

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 2:38 am

    Well Scoop, now that this fancy exhibition is finally over we can see what the sour Scot is made of. If he doesn’t strike while the iron is hot (as in this US Open or the next Aussie) he may be in tennis limbo for the rest of his career.
    It sure sounds like you’re changing horses and going from a Djoker believer to aMurray proselytizer.

  • Michael · August 6, 2012 at 4:07 am

    “Federer can still be satisfied with a Olympic silver medal in singles, which is a special accomplishment in it’s own right.”

    A guy who has done about everything you can in the sport other then a Calendar Slam is going to be satisfied with a silver medal and think it’s “a special accomplishment in it’s own right” ?

    Scoop, we’re not discussing little league baseball where everyone gets a trophy and everyone is a winner. We are talking about the GOAT (or, at min, one of the best ever.) He came up short. It’s a whole in the record. It’s not like a missing Major but because Oly has become somewhat more important to the players it matters a bit more then when the great Nick Massu took home the double.

  • loreley · August 6, 2012 at 5:57 am

    Roger Federer:

    “Andy was much better than I was today in many aspects of the game. For me, it’s been a great month. I won Wimbledon, became World No. 1 again, and I got silver. Don’t feel too bad for me. I am very, very proud honestly to have won a silver.

    “I had a very emotional tournament from start to finish. I could have lost in the first round against (Alejandro) Falla. Same thing obviously with (Juan Martin) del Potro. I felt like I won my silver, I didn’t lose it. So I feel very, very happy.”

    “I had tears in my eyes after my first round match. Doing media on court, I almost broke down,”

    “But this is how much this meant to me. I understood how close I was from losing. Then there was no doubt about it, I felt the same way exactly after the semis.

    “Maybe there was so much emotion already out of me that potentially today that kind of hindered me from playing my absolute very best.”

  • loreley · August 6, 2012 at 6:05 am

    Why did the Gold medal become something more important? Because Nadal won one?

    As far as I know the players have to play more Davis Cup in the future in order to be able to compete at the Olympics. That might cause more dilemma for them.

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 11:48 am

    IMHO, the gold become more important to the top guys because Agassi made (and makes) a big deal out of winning one. It is a big deal –for true Olympic sports.

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 11:49 am

    In the true spirit of the games all the footage is blacked out on YouTube but I will happily watch Dolgo’s victory over Haas freely.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 6, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    Fancy exhibition Steve? Federer said he was near tears after nipping Falla in the first round, during the on court interviews. This meant the world to Fed, a whole lot more than any fancy exhibition ever could. Murray came up big and stunned Federer, he beat him with superior tennis. Interesting that Murray now leads the head to head ( I believe 9-8 ) .

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 6, 2012 at 12:58 pm

    Michael Fed has a lot to be proud of he had a fantastic tournament just he ran into the guy playing the best tennis in the world this week and it was on his home court with some of the best crowd support anyone will ever see on the ATP. Fed knew his fate and accepted it – can’t win em all. Not even the great Federer can win em all, and he shouldn’t be expected to.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 6, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    Nice words Lorely, thanks for posting.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 6, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    I think the gold medal in tennis is so coveted because it’s the biggest event on the planet. And all the best players want to compete and win the biggest most prestigious prizes. (Except Mardy Fish this Olympics – can’t believe he played DC over the OLY)

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    “Fancy exhibition Steve? Federer said he was near tears after nipping Falla in the first round”

    Fed cries often. If you beat Fed in snooker he might openly weep.

    The tennis in OLY is an over-hyped exhibition. It matters to the top guys in terms of completing their trophy collection. To the other guys it’s glamorous 750 points and the thrill of playing for your country. If Simon & Tsonga do well what happens? The French guys play each other? Davis Cup is MUCH better.

  • dan markowitz · August 6, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    You cannot overlook the fact that Fed beat Djoker and Murray indoors. That’s huge. Where did Fed play well last year? Yes, the Open, but he won most of his events indoors. I saw Fed at 2-all in the first set in the Olympic finals run around a Murray second serve and hit a forehand 10 feet long. A mis-hit, that doesn’t happen indoors, but outdoors we see a lot more shanking by Fed. We don’t see the serve as sharp. He did beat Nadal in straights at Indy Wells this year, but Nadal has not been the top guy on outdoor hard. And we also saw Fed get buzz-sawed by Djok at the French. I think if they face each other at the Open, we’ll see the same. I speak to Djoker in Toronto in the next couple of days and I’m going to ask him straight-out about that.

    If you have any questions you want me to ask Djok, I have a one on one interview set up with him in Toronto, so shoot some out to me and I’ll pick the best ones, ask the Djoker and write up the responses, although I am doing feature piece on him for Tennis Australia Magazine and Tennis.com.

    Just went on the Maid of the Mist at Niagara Falls and it was awesome. Amazing power, force water fall and mist. Got to get in car and drive now, but only Young playing Chardy in early stadium matches. Other than asking DY what with not hiring or even talking to Spadea about coaching, I got nothing to say to DY.

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 2:22 pm

    Dan what’s Murray’s record in slam finals? Do you even know?

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 3:15 pm

    Please ask Djoker if HE WAS SURPRISED that Federer won a 17th Grand Slam title.

  • Michael · August 6, 2012 at 3:47 pm

    @loreley “Why did the Gold medal become something more important? Because Nadal won one?”

    I suppose it’s like pinpointing when The Australian became important again (from a second rate event to one of the 4 most important). Not I think because of any one player (though Sampras played a large roll in the focus on Majors generally) but, in part, because more top players began caring more about it.

    However, Scoop’s fictionalized presentation of the tennis world aside, it’s not that big. You can’t speed the tradition along. It takes time. The tour, again for Scoop, places it below the Masters 1000 in terms of value. I would disagree with Steve in that I think it is way above a glorified EXO. But it is far from winning a Major.

    Scoop quotes Fed interview lines to elevate the importance of Oly. Despite retransmitting press releases himself he seems to not appreciate the top players have images and brands to protect. What does he think Fed will say. (Or any player that is there ? I know I’m competing “for country” but in tennis it’s not as big as our Major events” Yes, that will go over with fans and sponsors. And for Fed it probably did mean a lot to win GOLD simply to fill in a missing accomplishment.

    To speak of the GOAT (or near if you prefer) as having a lot to be proud of winning Silver — it’s almost condescending. No, Scoop, you can’t win them all. That doesn’t mean Fed is satisfied with a Silver.

    Scoop, as you well know the gold medal isn’t so coveted (relative to, say, a W title) nor is “it” the biggest event on the planet of by it you mean tennis. And if by “it” you mean Oly itself that doesn’t make it the biggest for each sport. Water Polo, sure. Tennis no. All the best players want to compete ? This may be the first Oly ever where all the top players wanted to compete. Didn’t Roddick blow it off in 2008 so as not to mess up USO prep.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 6, 2012 at 4:25 pm

    An OLY gold medal is very important. The American gymnast Gabby is going to earn over $100 million minimum, because of her gold medal. Oscar De La Hoya and Wladimir Klitschko both have said winning their gold medals was the highpoint of their careers. It’s a very special achievement, regardless of how many points the ATP designates for it. Don’t understand why you Michael so want to discredit and diminish an OLY tennis gold medal. I think this year’s tennis event was one of the best parts of these London Games. The crowds were fantastic, even people like Kobe, Greg Norman, Kate and the Prince, and Bill Gates came by to check it out.

  • Tom Michael · August 6, 2012 at 4:57 pm

    The importance of the Olympics is based a lot on the country of the athlete. In the US, the important events are really only the US Open and Wimbledon. The Australian and French Opens are considered second rate slams. So for us Americans, we can easily justify our statements of its low importance compared to the slams. Also, the United States are so used to winning so many medals in other sports, that we take the games for granted, even when the Bryans and Williams win.

    In Russia on the other hand, the Olympics matter so much. Kafelnikov became more famous for his Olympic Gold than he did for his slams.

    Tennis was one of the original sports in the 1896 Olympics–around the time, that all of the slams even started. This makes it important to me. It went through a lot of politics whereby it got removed around 1924 and then reinstated only back in 1988. For countries that don’t win many summer medals like Switzerland, or countries that rarely win medals in either games like Chile, the Olympics become that much more important.

    There is also the worldwide notion that making the Olympics is an accomplishment unto itself, as well medalling. So a tennis player making the Olympics is just that. For Hantuchova, making it is enough for her. For Nadal, making it was enough for him, but 2008 Gold was a surprise he didn’t expect; however, he won because he played with so little pressure. For Djokovic, being an ambassador for Serbia was his motivation for his lone Bronze in 2008. For Del Potro, his bronze medal is the first medal for Argentina at the London games. Argentina may be blessed to win just five medals. For the Williams and the Bryans, nothing is bigger than Olympic Gold. I don’t believe winning Silver was enough for Federer or Sharapova. They don’t want a career Silver Slam but they have to settle for it.

    For Murray, his winning Gold was a continuation of Britain’s historical success at the Olympics whether it was at home in London or abroad. It was just inevitable. Murray even said before the gold medal final, that he is going to face a Federer who never won Olympic Gold before. So he knew that Federer was going to feel the pressure, and he reminded him of it. Like Federer who won slams likes to remind Murray that he never won a slam before the final of a slam. So turnabout was fair play. It also helped that Federer was most likely spent from his semifinal win. And Juan Martin who should have been physically and mentally spent from the loss in the semis was just a courageous and inspired competitor to rebound for the bronze medal win against Djokovic.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 6, 2012 at 5:26 pm

    Well said Tom. Agree, just to even make the Olympics is a remarkable achievement and Donald Young and Ryan Harrison, Christina McHale should feel proud to have competed. To win a medal…wow. Del Potro’s (and some of the other players’) reactions after winning silver or bronze medals was a lot more emotional than what one might see at an exhibition or even some ATP or WTA events. Tennis is a part of Olympic history and it always will be because it’s one of the world’s favorite sports to watch and play.

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 6:27 pm

    Scoop, Fed actually won a Platinum Medal. News quoted from PseudoFedBlog:

    “Good evening,
    So is this a new thing fans? Do all Grand Slams have to be played twice now every time I win? Am I going to be made to enter in the U.S. Open twice? But it’s OK. I like to stay positive.

    I am so happy to confirm that I am the only player in H1STORY to win a PLATINUM medal. Congratulations to Andy for getting a yellow one. He will have more chances in the future.”

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 6:35 pm

    “The American gymnast Gabby is going to earn over $100 million minimum, because of her gold medal. Oscar De La Hoya and Wladimir Klitschko both have said winning their gold medals was the highpoint of their careers.”

    Scoop those are traditional OLY sports. In fact, Olympic boxing bears little resemblance to pro boxing. Gymnastics for me is one of the ideal OLY sports along with track & field events and, of course, the bobsled. Let the anonymous, great athletes have their day without the millionaire basketball players & tennis players.

  • Steve · August 6, 2012 at 6:49 pm

    ..for tennis OLY to ever take hold with the tennis fan they will have to totally revamp the bracketing system and kill off Davis Cup.

  • Michael · August 6, 2012 at 9:30 pm

    Scoop, I think you mean instead of “so want to discredit and diminish” (as if I have some hidden self-interest in the status of Oly tennis) discuss with some attempt at objectivity the relative importance of Oly tennis. I really think, as I said in another post, Murray stated it well. It’s becoming more important. The inference being it is not there yet. (And I suspect he would trade it in a nanosecond for a W or USO). It’s definitely something you want to add to your trophy chest if you’re Fed/Nadal/Joker and are racking up Major titles. If you’re Fish, points and money may be more important.

    @Scoop “even people like Kobe, Greg Norman, Kate and the Prince, and Bill Gates came by to check it out.””

    Even people like ? I see, people that have nothing but official interest in tennis (the “royalty”), random rich guy (is it something about Gates or any very rich guy makes the event important in your mind ?), and golf star (dont’ get it. The more people from other sports decide to watch an Oly event the more important it becomes rule ? ) decide to “check it out” and that makes it a very important tennis event .

    @Scoop “Well said Tom. Agree, just to even make the Olympics is a remarkable achievement”

    @Scoop “just to even make the Olympics is a remarkable achievement and Donald Young ”

    Ah, we’re back to the anyone that makes the ATP is a great achievement? Really ? Will we go over that one every week. Yes, Scoop, let’s all explicitly acknowledge the truism: being a pro athlete (in any sport) is a great achievement. But unless we never want to evaluate the athletes AGAINST THEMSELVES and within THE CONTEXT OF COMPETING WITHIN THEIR SPORTS we should drop this one.

    The statement adds nothing. “Newport is a great event ! Winning Newport is an amazing achievement because being a pro tennis player is a great achievement. Then to win an ATP level tournament — stupendous.” Yah, we watch tennis around here Scoop. We get it.

    Re Oly. You’re aware of the position of Oly in tennis. If you want to elevate it then instead of pretending it’s something it isn’t promote actions that might do it over time. Increase the points. Make it mandatory. Perhaps change the format. After a few generations of tennis players start dreaming about it and working toward it like they do with the Majors it might become very important.

  • Mitch · August 7, 2012 at 1:35 am

    Michael, outside of Fish and maybe Florian Mayer, who may not have been eligible for funding from Germany, which eligible players didn’t choose to play the Olympics. I think the fact that so many chose to play when easier points and prize money were on offer in LA and Washington proves how much the players care.

  • Steve · August 7, 2012 at 1:43 am

    Nadal skipped it. No need to win it again.

  • Michael · August 7, 2012 at 3:17 am

    “which eligible players didn’t choose to play the Olympics.”

    I don’t know. But I thought most choose to play now.

    Not to bore with repetition but, again, that most top players play (first time ever ?) is one factor in its gaining importance. But if I had a tournament tomorrow and I came up with $1 billion prize money everyone would play. It wouldn’t make it a very important tournament though. Getting all the top players to show up is just one factor.

    I agree with Steve. Nadal is not risking possibly being able to play at USO for another Oly medal. He did it once. It’s not like racking up Majors.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 7, 2012 at 2:06 pm

    Didn’t Uncle Toni and Rafa say it was the hardest most difficult decision they ever made, to skip the Olympics? Didn’t get the sense at all that Rafa just decided to blow off the Olympics. And the reason for skipping it was curious too because there was no evident injury vs. Rosol and he had plenty of rest to be ready for the Games. We really don’t know what the true reason for the pullout was or if there was an ulterior motive/reason. Hope Rafa is ready to compete again soon as his presence is sorely missed, it’s just not the same without him playing.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 7, 2012 at 2:09 pm

    : ) Michael, you’re a funny guy, I love the Olympics, Olympic tennis is one of my favorite events of the year, love the format of two out of three, playing every day, and how importantly every player takes it. Like Justin Gimelstob said, “every match is like a gold medal match.” Love the doubles and mixed doubles too. Hope you come around to appreciate Olympic tennis more someday.

  • Steve · August 7, 2012 at 5:03 pm

    Scoop when the dream team beats Nigeria or whoever by 80 points you get a thrill? You love that?

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 7, 2012 at 6:25 pm

    Not at all Steve, in fact, I haven’t watched a second of mens hoops yet. Have difficulty even watching a close basketball game, let alone rout. Really enjoying the women’s soccer, what a game vs. Canada, but that call about the goalie holding the ball too long was dubious. BTW, I’m in the semis of the mens 45s at Upper Ridgewood if you’re free or in the area, match starts at 4:30 today. Really nice club up there, the clubhouse is set on a hill and it overlooks the about 16 har tru courts which are surrounded by a green forest. Quite a scenic and impressive club.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 7, 2012 at 6:31 pm

    BTW2, former coach Jelena Gencic says Djokovic’s slight decline is due to personal problems…http://english.blic.rs/Sports/8926/Novak-has-to-resolve-personal-issues

  • Steve · August 7, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    Maybe I can catch the 2nd set if they let non-members in the club.

  • Michael · August 7, 2012 at 10:17 pm

    @Scoop,

    “Didn’t Uncle Toni and Rafa say it was the hardest most difficult decision they ever made, to skip the Olympics?

    What is your point ? Is this supposed to be some additional evidence that the Oly is very important ?

    Did you just fall off the turnip truck ? Stop acting like a signal booster for every media sensitive soundbite that falls out of a players/players rep mouth. Let me ask you this. What would you possible expect Nadal to say ?

    Ask Rios how important Oly is. But don’t expect Nadal will ever say anything to harm the Nadal brand. Nadal is still smarting from when he went public about ATP tour issues and Fed served him up. I don’t think we’ll be hearing anything remotely controversial from the Nadal camp for another 5 years.

    I got ill after you quoted Gimelstob. A new low for you. Now go wipe your nose clean.

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 8, 2012 at 2:35 am

    Steve thanks for showing up it was great to meet you finally. Took a beating BTW 62 61. Ten losses in a row to the same player.

  • Michael · August 8, 2012 at 2:38 am

    Scoop, the above post now sounds a wee nasty to me and I withdraw the brown-nosing comment.

    As for me coming around to appreciate Oly tennis. I do appreciate it. I like it. (Though I find some of the other events more exciting.)

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 8, 2012 at 2:53 am

    Geez I lost the tournament SF of the state 45s 62 61 and then I have to get hit by Michael’s hammer on top of it!

  • Andrew Miller · August 8, 2012 at 3:05 am

    Scoop, from Gencic’ quotes I can only believe that Novak’s “personal problems” could relate to one thing: yep. The world’s best fan. I wonder if she means: “if Novak listened to me more and less to his best fan, he would be doing better and he knows it.”

    Ya never know.

  • Andrew Miller · August 8, 2012 at 3:12 am

    As for Nadal, I take him at his word, but as Michael says – anytime you turn down the flag bearer spot at the Olympics (especially in Spain, which has a lot of great athletes, some probably at the name recognition of Nadal there) you better beg your country for forgiveness. Those don’t get handed out every day and it already looks bad enough that he declined.

    Nadal is also out of Canada. Hmmm. Usually players skip (or start playing slightly worse tennis) during one of the two warm-up Masters for the U.S. Open (Cincy on occasion sees some of the worst tennis from slam contenders). But Nadal skipping Canada – that’s a pretty big skip and puts pressure on him to do well at Cincy, which is a pretty high temperature tournament and not an easy one to “comeback” to.

    Maybe Nadal is not only injured but also depressed. This is a way to do a lot more fishing and other stuff. I don’t blame him, especially since the Williams girls have shown that timeouts can be helpful to a long-term career.

  • Steve · August 8, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    Scoop it seemed you were about the enter beast mode at the end. Perhaps this makes a case for 5 set matches.
    🙂

  • Scoop Malinowski · August 8, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    Steve beast mode wouldn’t and didn’t help. 20 sets played 20 sets lost to the same player. Closest I got was last match 5-4 up and 15-all and a net cord miss which would have given me 15-30 – two points away from set. My game is unfortunately TAYLOR MADE for him!

1 2

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com
To top