Tennis Prose




Oct/12

9

Players Talk About Their Favorite TV Tennis Commentators


Vince Spadea: “I like Patrick McEnroe and Luke Jensen. I like the former players. The guys who are young and hungry and excited about doing it. And they know the information and they know the players. And they get the inside scoop much easier than someone from a computer. I’m not trying to knock anyone who is doing that. I like to listen to people putting enthusiasm and personality into talking about tennis, not just about the exact match. Patrick is a very intelligent guy, been around a lot of years, obviously had a great career himself. He has a brother who is a legend. There’s so many aspects from tennis that he can kind of dig from. Luke is high energy. He’s inspiring. He comes up with little phrases, little nicknames, little inside stories about each player or certain individuals. He’s always been into participating and trying to inspire tennis fans and trying to grow the game. I like Chris Evert too. Articulate and smart and obviously a legend in her own right.”

James Blake: “Cliff Drysdale is my favorite. He’s the most underrated. Because he’s so good at kind of playing the straight man and like he doesn’t know what he’s talking about [smiles]. And if you really listen to him, you know he knows exactly what he’s talking about. And was one of the great players. And he has one of the great voices that can do anything with that voice. So he’s my favorite to listen to. He does a great job whether he’s teamed with Patrick McEnroe or whoever, he’s my favorite.”

Justin Gimelstob: “Patrick McEnroe. I think he does a great job with the combination of combining inside experience yet still being supportive of the players. And yet honest enough to give an honest critique. I think some of the commentators are too hard on the players. And some are too soft. But I think Patrick does a great combination.”

Scott Lipsky: “I like to listen to John McEnroe. I like both McEnroes, Patrick and John. I loved Bud Collins. They’re both kind of the same, kinda tell it like it is. Those two guys I really think are the best two.”

Ivan Ljubicic: “Patrick McEnroe and Cliff Drysdale, they’re pretty cool, I like them. And I like the guys from Eurosport as well, David Mercer and Frew McMillan. You can see they play tennis and know a lot about tennis. And it’s a really relaxed feeling. They talk like they only commentate techniques or tactics. I have to say I don’t like Pam Shriver. She’s always so technique that it’s, I mean, it’s really boring. But the other guys, they know how to laugh, they know how to entertain people I think.”

Bob Bryan: “I like to listen to Jim Courier. He’s been there. He knows what he’s talking about. I think Pat Mac’s good. I like Cliff Drysdale. I think all the guys are pretty good. As long as they’re positive about tennis.”

Brian Baker: “I like John McEnroe a lot. And I think Patrick’s very good. Overall I think tennis is good right now, commentating. I really like Cliff and Patrick, they are always an excellent team and they compliment each other pretty good.”

Jonas Bjorkman: “John and Patrick McEnroe. They know the game very well and they know the players very well. They sort of know the weaknesses and strengths of the game. And the players. That’s important. Some guys who commentate are not down in the locker room and checking out things. Both of them are down here. They know a lot of the players still, even if they are not playing. So I think that’s a strength as a commentator. There’s a few out there who are very good. But those are the guys who I find are doing a good job.”

John Newcombe: “John McEnroe’s good when he doesn’t talk about everything besides the tennis match. When he sticks to the tennis match it’s pretty good. When he starts talking about everything else that’s important to him, I kind of lose it then. But when he’s talking about the match I think he has something good to say. I think Cliff Drysdale does a good job. And I like Jim Courier, I think he does a good job. I think his analysis of what’s happening out there is quite good. Tony Trabert I’ve always thought was great. I worked with him on CBS for ten years. And I’ve worked with him on Australian television for 12 years. I really enjoyed working with Tony.”

Greg Rusedski: “Whether you like him or whether you don’t, John McEnroe’s always interesting. He’s got a great knowledge of the game. Sometimes he’s fair with the players sometimes he’s not [smiles] but he’s always interesting. I think Patrick McEnroe does quite a good job as well. Patrick is quite interesting to listen to because he was never a top player like his brother John but he was quite astute and he did the best he could with the game he had and got to #30 in the world. He had to find different ways to win rather than pure talent and ability. So he’s got a different perspective on what it takes to succeed in tennis. He’s seen the top side of tennis but he’s also seen the side where the guys are struggling a little bit out there. So it’s nice to have the double perspective out there. Cliff Drysdale – his history of the game, his knowledge of the game. He’s been out there since when the players had their first union in 1973. He’s seen what tennis has become nowadays. So his knowledge of the game and his insights are quite good to have.”

67 comments

  • Steve · October 9, 2012 at 4:52 pm

    It seems Drysdale(my favorite) and John Mac are the top of the player rankings. I’m little surprised to see so little love for Koenig –I think he’s very good.

    I think the funniest hosts are on Inida’s Star Sports They crack as many jokes as they make comments on the matches which can improve a so/so.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 9, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    Agree Steve, Koenig ranks up with the best but he’s not on major American TV yet so I don’t think a lot of players are familiar with his work yet. American tennis commentating is very strong right now but Koenig is good enough to hold his own with anyone, as is Jason Goodall. Lleyton Hewitt also did some TV work in Australia last year and he was excellent also. Fred Stolle is still active in Australia and he is as good as anyone ever was. As long as they minimize non players with rudimentary knowledge of world class tennis – Bill McAtee, Dick Enberg – TV tennis commentating will continue to shine. It was very frustrating to have to endure McAtee and Enberg’s novice observations during major finals when brilliant commentators like Koenig, Stolle, Drysdale, Luke Jensen have much more to offer.

  • Steve · October 9, 2012 at 9:50 pm

    Agreed but I think Enberg and Mac are good together. J Mac needs someone with a touch of smoothness & class on a big stage –Drysdale would fit the bill too. Someone harsh with someone smooth & nice seems to work well.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 9, 2012 at 10:22 pm

    John MCEnroe can work with anyone and he is still a pleasure to listen to, he is the voice and conscious of the sport. Enberg was excellent with the NFL and MLB but tennis is an intricately detailed and complex sport, he brought down the tennis telecasts when he was in the booth, he was more fit as the set up man in the studio. Tennis telecasts requires two or three experts to analyze what’s happening. A non or novice player like Enberg brought nothing substantial to the telecast, just fancy words and enthusiasm. Enberg didn’t talk with the players, nor did he know much about them outside from the obvious facts in the media notes. This lack of knowledge does not compare with experts like Stolle, Cahill, Pat Mac, BG, Evert, Mary Joe, who are actively involved and know the players and know what it’s like to play in important grand slam matches.

  • Julian Johnson · October 10, 2012 at 6:33 am

    Koenig and Goodall by far are the BEST team! They practice one of Miles Davis’ axioms: “put a little space in it.” The art of silence, of allowing the match to speak for itself is underrated. When they speak, they are concise, smart and often hilarious. And those accents!

    JMac has improved a lot from the early nineties and can be very entertaining and informative. Its funny to check out Youtube for old US Open matches and hear how patchy he was. He’s almost British now.

    Chrissy loves to talk about Chrissy and Pam Shriver has issues. Martina is smart but talks too much. Gilberts okay. Cahill is sharp. Cliffy is very good. Mary Joe, not bad.

    Pmac is a bore and full of himself. Such the expert – eye roll. The worst is Gimelstob; its so important for him to impress the audience with his encyclopedic knowledge. Talks too much to allow the match to shine. The Rupert Pupkin of commentators.

    My two cents.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 10, 2012 at 6:54 am

    I love that, “the Rupert Pubkin of commentators,” a reference to the King of Comedy. I like Gilbert, but heard Luke Jensen recently doing the WTT playoffs, and he was excellent, good voice, good knowledge, and good humor.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 10, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    Rupert Pupkin was actually pretty darn good when he got his shot at the show! So is Gimelstob in my book, I enjoy to listen to him, good stories, astute analysis, maybe goes overboard on occasion but I like the enthusiasm and love for the sport. He’s become very good. King of Comedy is a classic. Disagree on the Patrick McEnroe view, I always liked him in the booth, he does an excellent job. Funny, smart, good analysis, gibes well with partners, I have never watched a match and thought Patrick said something really wrong there or did a bad job. He’s an absolute pleasure to listen to from the late 90s to now. The only ex player that I didn’t like his broadcast work was Mal Washington, because he seemed to just state the obvious. BTW, Koenig worked for ESPN in China for Djokovic’s win vs. Tsonga. I saw a You Tube of Djok’s trophy dance with the ballkids and Koenig did the call with Sam Gore for some arm of ESPN because the ESPN logo was on the screen. Koenig is fantastic. Hopefully he will work his way up to the main ESPN network. I’m sure he will.

  • Steve · October 10, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    I imagine most people watching the US Open finals aren’t tennis addicts and like the familiar presence of Enberg but I also prefer two tennis experts. I agree Julian 100%. I mentioneb before Gimbelstob’s attempts at frat boy humor doesn’t really work for tennis.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 10, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    Scoop, have you heard PMac on ESPN Radio. I think he’s on 10-11 AM on Saturdays. The guy has more jobs than Larry Brown coached basketball teams. He’s not too good on radio. Seems to me like he tries to hard to establish his sports knowledge outside tennis and I’ve only heard him talk about tennis when asked by another host or a listener. He tries to come across as the voice of reality about the Yankees, Jets and Knicks.

    I’m not saying he doesn’t know his sports, but his voice can be petulant, know-it-all-ish and he sounds like he’s forcing it. He doesn’t have those problems in tennis announcing for the most part. But unlike Johnny Mac, who can be funny and loose, PMac seems to work best when he’s the serious, “hey, I’ve got to reel in BG and Pam” type.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 10, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    Gimelstob has changed though, he’s gotten better, doesn’t use that line after a magic shot, “That is FILTHEE.” That word does not fit at all in tennis.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 10, 2012 at 4:27 pm

    Never heard him on radio Dan, only listen to radio for music mostly on WFUV. I will check it out though.

  • marc nichol · October 10, 2012 at 4:27 pm

    new to the site, hello everyone…will say just two thing here for now…could go on with this topic forever…gimelstob was the worst thing i ever heard those first broadcasts, as someone said trying to impress and hyper to boot…he has obviously made a concerted effort to get better and has…and as far as someone saying chris likes to talk about chris…there is no one in the history of sports broadcasting that like to talk about himself more than john mcenroe..he can steer any conversation back to himself and often does..newk says he’s good when he sticks to the tennis and doesn’t wander off, well when he wanders off it’s almost invariably about him…drives me absolutely nuts, the ultimate egotist…if it seems like i’m being hard on him, i am because as someone said he’s the voice of tennis…and yes, he has gotten better over the years but still way overrated to me and was from the beginning…btw, if anyone got the “pleasure” of seeing his cable talk show you saw the worst one in history, the man still has trouble communicating, which is a troublesome trait in a broadcaster…summing up, if jmac is the voice of tennis, tennis can do better in the future..of course we all know john’s going to die in the booth..talking about john no doubt

  • Steve · October 10, 2012 at 5:03 pm

    I’ve heard PMac on the radio and he’s fine on other sports when discussing New York teams though I always expect him to segue to telling us that Donald Young needs a new coach no matter the topic at hand. lol.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 10, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    Marc, Welcome to the site, great comments. Agree, Gimelstob is much better now he has absolutely grown into the role very well. His knowledge and analytical skills combined with his enthusiasm for the sport make him a pleasure to listen to. I adore Chris Evert, whatever she has to say about tennis is a privilege to listen to. Johnny Mac – the same thing. He’s a legend. But I don’t see him as self absorbed, he’s fair and honest and calls it like he sees it. People want to hear his personal insights and memories, after all it’s Johnny Mac talking. I wish Muhammad Ali could still talk in public, would love to hear his memories and insights after decades of perspective but… We should enjoy JMac while we have him, he’s a one of a kind legendary champion. His talk show was good, it’s not easy going from the guy always being asked questions, to suddenly being the one asking the questions. Sure, it was awkward at times but still an entertaining show to see him in a different role. Hey it was better than watching him try to sing like Larry Holmes or dance like Monica Seles )

  • Dieter Stadler · October 10, 2012 at 7:48 pm

    Really miss Mary Carillo in that list. She knows the game as well as anybody and usually lightens up proceedings with her unique wit and humour.

  • Julian Johnson · October 11, 2012 at 12:17 am

    I don’t care how much work Gimelstob has done. I never feel that he is talking to the audience, but at the audience. His neediness, particularly when he does oncourt interviews, to impress or dazzle, or appear friends with the big boys…nah.

    Pmac is technically sound; but his personality is obnoxious. When they have the camera on him, he sits there shaking his head like he’s Buddha and got answers for everything. John has more humility than him. And, as someone alluded, this guy has more pots on the stove than a chain restaurant.

    Also, the beat down that he and John delivered to Donald Young was petty and pathetic, particularly as a commentator/USTA head of PD. Maybe he’d have a better relationship with Young and better insight into how to development players if he was there enough.

    Did any of you fellas read Tim Mayotte’s critique of PD? Classic, raw and real.

    And one more thing about Chrissy: her obvious bias and contempt for the Williams sisters turns my stomach. As some of you know, Venus said something after she lost to Kerber at the Open that was extraordinary:

    “she’d never felt American” until that match…by HER home crowd at HER home Slam. Can you imagine that?! Why is no one talking about that I wonder.

    Chris Evert, to my ear, goes out of her way to criticize, judge, diminish and accentuate the negative about these sisters. I would imagine it hard to feel American, when American legends take subtle and not so subtle shots at you constantly.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 1:09 am

    JJ you are just firing away tonight! I can’t recall ever getting any kind of sense Evert has any contempt for the Williams family but I will listen more closely next year for that. I don’t think any American commentator would feel that for the family or even try to snidely take shots, it’s a no win situation and makes no sense to do that. Aside from the IW affair, the Williams have been about as classy as can be, even in the aftermath of Serena’s controversial moments at the US Open (Stosur match, Clijsters match, and the robbery line call in the Capriati match). I don’t see why Evert or anyone would want to take subtle shots at the Williams family. Missed that interesting Venus comment but it does make sense, she is respected and well liked but far from beloved by American fans, she is not beloved like Agassi and Federer and Connors. You’re right they were critical of Young during his loss to Federer at the Open (think that’s the match you are referencing) but the Young family has been frustrating for them to deal with. They can’t get DY to work as hard as they think he should be and Young has received prefential treatment from the system (received so many wildcards into pro events that he’s earned well over six figures just on those freebies alone). It comes down to that Donald’s mom won’t give up control of Donald and basically wants the credit for his success. But it’s gotten to the point that DY needs to hear a new voice from a new coach because his mom, though she is terrific coach to get Donald to this point, she is just not the best option to coach a player against ATP caliber players. Mrs Young does not have the experience to devise tactics for her son vs. top 100 players as well as people like Cahill, Gilbert, Stefanki, etc. could. Her knowledge of tennis is limited and many people think this is a big reason why Donald has hit a plateau and is now regressing. I think the McEnroes want the best for Young and they were showing him tough love during the Fed match loss. Did not read the Mayotte critique, where can I read it? Have a huge respect for the wisdom of Tim Mayotte, the man knows his tennis.

  • Julian Johnson · October 11, 2012 at 1:32 am

    Scoop, I’m inspired! Here’s the Mayotte link:

    http://adirondacktennis.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/tim-mayottes-reply-to-the-wayne-bryan-letter/

    Lemme know what you think of that. There’s no question that Young is not on the right track; is there any relationship to Mayotte’s observations/issues that he brings to light? The parent’s should have let go long ago. That is clear.

    It is always a bad policy for a parent to coach their child. Yeah, some kids turn out okay; but the confusion and mixing of roles…not good, IMO. My dad coached me and my siblings and it sucked. We were his clay and he was trying to walk in his dad’s shoes. Disaster.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 1:59 am

    Thanks for posting this letter Julian. Tim Mayotte is an authority who should be listened to. Hopefully he will be listened to and not ignored. America can produce Kudlas and Socks, but we’re capable of producing Agassi and Sampras.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 11, 2012 at 3:31 am

    Look, I’ve said all along that Gimelstob is annoying and hard to like. The guy knows his tennis, but he drills it into his announcing so that a tennis match seems like a calculus test.

    I disagree about Johnny Mac being overly-egotistical. Maybe he was initially, but I don’t hear him talking about his playing days then or now very much. And you have to take what he says seriously, the guy is after all, the greatest American player besides Sampras ever to play the game. He’s a genius, a Picasso.

    As for Mayotte’s assessment of PMac and Higueras, all I can say is, “Wow.” But I don’t for a second not believe him. If Higueras and PMac wouldn’t even get on the court with the young kids to see how they’re training, they’re out of touch and shouldn’t be running PD. Their record speaks for themselves. There isn’t a single player they’ve developed so far who has done anything special, and what they did to Taylor Townsend by taking her off the USTA Junior Davis Cup team was wrong and cruel.

  • adb · October 11, 2012 at 3:46 am

    I prefer Mary Carillo, working with Cliff and PMac.

  • Steve · October 11, 2012 at 6:26 am

    I think Tracy Austin is great.

    I also think America loves Venus. Serena is more controversial and often ungracious in defeat. When she lost to Henin at the open once she said it was due to “lucky shots”. HA. The not feeling American comment is one anybody can make nowadays and I get it. There’s really no shared culture besides the unifying consumption of cheeseburgers.

    As far as PD is the US just let Courier run everything. He seems more hands-on and ready to work hard. Willing to do whatever it takes to be successful. I’m 100% for a Courier dictatorship for American tennis.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    Steve, America does not love Venus like Federer. But maybe no player is as beloved as Federer. Venus gets about the same kind of positive reception as Sampras, Chang, Courier, Lindsay, etc. Good nice warm applause but nothing too mind blowing like Manny Pacquiao or Muhammad Ali got.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 4:27 pm

    adb i just watched Gilbert vs. Sampras on ESPN from Munich Grand Slam Cup in 1990 and Mary was fantastic with Stolle and Cliff. Mary was really into it then, she was talking with the players and had all kinds of tidbits of information from the trenches. But now she doesn’t seem to be as interactive with the players and her analysis seems less insightful and informative though she is still pleasurable to listen to because she is a broadcast legend. My only knock is when she does her awful Bollettieri voice impression which see seems to do every tournament at least once. It’s worse than chalk on a blackboard.

  • Steve · October 11, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    I was shocked how good Mary was back then. She took Agassi to task for boycotting and called BG’s game low tech tennis. HA. Cliff & Stolle were are great together.

  • Julian Johnson · October 11, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    Steve, why do you think Venus doesn’t feel the love? Either she’s in denial or you are, as she walks around in her skin 24/7, has been on tour for 15 or 16 years and should know how she has been treated.

    Venus is losing now, thus she got ‘sympathy cheers’ at the Open. When she was top dog, or close, she was treated like a foreigner, according to her. Not saying by everybody, but its clear that the support for her and her sister is muted compared to other greats.

    As a person of color and long time tennis player, I have seen the ambivalence of the tennis community for black players first hand. In the media, this ambivalence/dislike/contempt can be subtle and perhaps, invisible to those who don’t have to deal with it.

    I repeat: for a veteran player to say after years of championship excellence, that this was the “first year” that she “felt American” at her home Slam indicates that she got the message. In spite of her nationality and greatness, something else trumped that. Its a shame that Venus can articulate such a profound disconnect and it somehow evaporates into thin air.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    Steve, Mary absolutely bludgeoned Agassi about that pullout, Cliff tried to defend Agassi from the onslaught of Carillo but he wasn’t up to the task!

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 6:35 pm

    Julian, It’s an interesting topic. But I don’t think Venus got any less love than Davenport, Capriati or Seles did. I think the way Venus plays has something to do with it. She is very focused and machinelike while playing, she does not interact with the crowds or show much emotion till the match is over. Crowds don’t connect with players like that as much as they do with ones who interact, like Connors, Djokovic, Taylor Dent on grandstand vs. Navarro, Roddick. I just don’t think there is any underlying racial component here IMO. Tennis fans love great tennis and characters who show emotions and interact, whatever their color or where they come from. Tsonga and Monfils are very popular at the US Open for these reasons, because they are dynamic performers who love to interact with the crowd. I saw Monfils play doubles after he lost in singles last year and he had the crowd on Court 17 ROARING. They loved him, after the match he gave away all his stuff, racquet, shirts, wristbands, towels, like egging the crowd on too like Hey do you want some more? This was after he was clowning around on the last points of the match which they lost. The crowd was loving it, they love Monfils. Venus just never shows that kind of fun side, she is almost too serious on the court. Just my two cents.

  • Steve · October 11, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    Julian, I haven’t watched Venus play in a long time but I used watch her a lot. I’ve seen the crowd many times applaud her. She was America’s sweetheart for a while. Girl power was big in the 90s. P-) I know she’s had some health issues recently and hasn’t been as much in the limelight. Not feeling American, I think, is diff. than not feeling appreciated by tennis fans. I don’t always feel American either. I think it’s pretty common.

  • Steve · October 11, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    Also, my GF in 90s LOVED the Williams sisters so maybe my perspective is skewed. I never root by country. I love the international aspect of tennis. In fact, none of my vary fav. players are Americans. Maybe that’s another aspect to tennis. There’s a lot of choice. Even in Davis Cup I root for good matches and France and Argentina.
    Didn’t the sisters move to France for a while?

  • Julian Johnson · October 11, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    Scoop, if Venus gets the “love” you say she does, why doesn’t she feel it? Is she making it up? Or is she privy to thing in her life experience that you aren’t? Just curious, because you and Steve have both insisted that the feelings that Venus expressed at the Open are not true/or correct/or accurate.

    If somebody told me that they had a headache, I hope I wouldn’t disagree, I mean, how could I? If Venus’ perception of her and Serena’s experience is that they are not treated like “real Americans” in the States, perhaps, instead of saying, “that’s not true,” trying to see it her way would be in order, no?!

  • Steve · October 11, 2012 at 9:58 pm

    What does “feeling American” even mean? Does it mean being a WASP that’s been here since the Mayflower? Does it mean being American Indian? Or simply being a proud citizen? Or something else? Good topic. If you have any more links to a Venus interview on this I’d like to read it. It’s certainly nice to taxed less on Grand Slam winnings than as a citizen in some other countries. 🙂

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 11:31 pm

    Julian, I have seen Venus play countless times, also seen her do a QA at Key Biscayne on stage this year and she has always conducted herself with class and nobility on and off the court. She is an ultimate champion in my book. And deservedly so, I have never seen any crowd disrespect her or treat her unfairly in any way. She is given the similar amount of respect and love as any American player I have ever seen except for maybe Agassi at the end and probably Seles the year she returned to the US Open. Those were very special situations obviously. I don’t understand why Venus would say that comment about not feeling American. Maybe she wants more love from the crowds at tournaments in America now that she is in the twilight of her career and that extra support will giver her an extra boost and an extra energy? Maybe she is looking for that something extra, extra motivation to make it more fun? Maybe is she trying to lay a subtle guilt trip on American tennis fans for whatever reason(s), not really backing her like she would like? Very interesting topic you have opened up here Julian. Now if you come out firing again like last night, just know that I have my armor vest on : )

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 11, 2012 at 11:43 pm

    Good point Steve, a lot of tennis fans adore Federer and they are not Swiss. My friendgirl loves Nadal she is not Spanish. I know an American readers whose favorite player is Murray and before him it was Hewitt. Gavin Rossdale is not Swiss, nor is Anna Wintour. Mike Tyson’s #1 fan was a white guy from Manchester, England, this guy has Tyson’s ring record down each arm and a full portrait tatto of Mike on his back. Tennis is a global sport now, most fans just pick a favorite player based on other qualities than just nationality or ethnicity. My favorite player of all time was a Chilean. The closest I ever was to Chile was Havasu City, Arizona.

  • marc nichol · October 12, 2012 at 12:54 am

    dan,

    i really can’t believe you don’t see what i’m talking about with jmac…i will say this, many times it is his partner, robinson, his brother, mary, cliff whoever who opens it up to him, but he never fails to wade in and make it about himself, absolutely drives me nuts..i wished they would all have a discussion beforehand that it’s got to stop but who is going to say that, no one…btw, i admit some of this is simply his ubiquitousness (if that’s a word)…how did one guy get to be the lead on all networks?..if letterman had gotten the tonight show like he wanted would he still angle to host a show on cbs too?..there is such an opening for some of these outlets to develop their own guys and gals…i really wish some lead/play-by-play guys would step up and become solely tennis announcers the way vin scully does baseball..i realize that’s a tough situation with tennis and its schedule and rotating tv commitments but i believe there is a future great tennis-centric announcer out there..they may be 12 like the next us slam champion but they are out there, and no i don’t believe it’s chris fowler though he’s gotten a lot better, then again laughing at the players when they play bad should be something you can overcome..if it seems like i’m focusing on the negative it’s because i’ve actually found great enjoyment when i find a stream on the internet that has no commercials and no announcers, it’s like being at the match..goodall and koenig are cool, i like that i don’t even know what they look like…bg is fun and cahill is class..so there, something positive

  • marc nichol · October 12, 2012 at 1:03 am

    one last thing to my jmac rant..i was utterly disgusted when during the wimby final this year he suggested without any sense of mirth that i could detect that pete might be rooting for andy so roger wouldn’t break more of his records…he also suggested tim henman may be rooting for fed so andy doesn’t get credit for doing what tim couldn’t..john being “controversial”?…to me no, john being a moron and unfunny..pete has always spoken highly of roger and said he doesn’t believe in rooting against players… and tim, give me a break, tim is a gentleman and a proud brit, can’t believe he would be doing that..pathetic all around imo

  • Julian Johnson · October 12, 2012 at 3:37 am

    Scoop/Steve:

    I find it interesting that you would assert that your observations of Venus would take precedence over her expressed feelings.

    To the question of “what feeling American” means: I, personally, have felt more American in Paris, than in the States. Or, maybe its, I have felt more like myself in Paris than in the United States. The United States has a way of making some people feel less equal than others. And unwanted.

    The United States has an ambivalent track record towards black Americans and to my eye, things haven’t changed so much. They are perhaps worse.

    Because I grew up in a black family that played tennis, had a grandparent/parent who coached two important, historic figures in tennis, who went to tournaments in juniors where people were less shy about letting you know you weren’t wanted than today…it looks like deja vu to me.

    As the end of summer came and we had the McEnroe/Young fiasco, the McEnroe/Townsend fiasco, the Williams sister’s – “don’t feel American” blues and the 100 replays of the Clijsters/Stosur finals…it was a bit much and very familiar.

    Maybe Venus wants to be treated well and she hasn’t been. Maybe people have let her know that she can never be white, no matter how great she is, so she’ll never be appreciated like Jennifer or Lindsay.

    I agree that through the years, Venus have Serena have been supported by many, many people globally. I am not saying that is not the case. But, what I have noticed – and I have good friends who do this – there is an irrational hostility among more than a few tennis people, a nitpicking, grudge bearing, in which these women can do nothing right.

  • Steve · October 12, 2012 at 9:54 am

    Julien, I feel more comfortable in Paris too. I get not feeling American as I initially said: ” The not feeling American comment is one anybody can make nowadays and I get it. There’s really no shared culture besides the unifying consumption of cheeseburgers.”

    It’s a dream of mine to live in France and be closer to my family.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 12, 2012 at 1:38 pm

    Marc, Johnny Mac is the biggest strongest personality in any TV commentating box, he is the straw that stirs the drink, the voice and conscious of the sport. People want to hear what he has to say, the man is a tennis genius. Every single match I have heard him do has been a pleasure and privilege actually. He is that good. Just the way it is. Someday there will be a next person who comes along and replaces Johnny mac and the voice and conscious of the sport, not sure who it could be at this point, maybe he is just a kid at this point. Agassi sure could be that guy if he ever chooses to do TV. He’s done it a few times here and there and he is fantastic. This may sound crazy but I can see Gimelstob growing into that role, it’s been very impressive how much better he has gotten, if he keeps working at his craft he can continue to mature and improve at it. It’s also possible Roddick, Courier and Dent could work their way into the mix. We’ll see. But Johnny Mac has the job down pat for another few decades. Johnny Mac is so good I wish they brought him in to do boxing on HBO, he knows boxing and loves boxing too and he has said he is interested to try it but HBO’s former sports Pres Ross Greenberg didn’t pull the trigger on it.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 12, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    The US tennis fans sure show a lot of love to Tsonga and Monfils Julian. And DY too for that matter when he is playing winning tennis. Again, I have never witnessed anything close to disrespectful behavior by any fan to Venus or Serena outside of that Indian Wells debacle. They are loved and respected as much as Davenport or Capriati or Chang, Courier or Roddick were. But like I said, Venus has a remote aloofness about her on court the way she competes and fans have a hard time connecting to players like that. She does not know how to use the crowd to her advantage, she does not interact with the crowd like Kuerten, Agassi, Roddick, Djokovic, Tsonga, Dent, knew how too. I don’t agree with her comment that she doesn’t feel American, I think that is bulljive. She is as American as can be and nobody tries to diminish that. It happens in sports, athletes say and do things to try to manipulate the media and fans to be on their side. Case in point, Agassi was widely disliked by most of the media in the early 90s but then he and his team decided to change course and be much more open and accessible and friendly to the media. Of course it worked and Agassi is now almost a saint like figure. You can’t beat the media, it’s just impossible. But a smart athlete can charm and play the media like a fiddle. Agassi is quite adept at this. Marcelo Rios obviously was not )

  • Julian Johnson · October 12, 2012 at 3:45 pm

    Scoop, I’m astounded that you can invalidate, can negate Venus’own reality based on your observations, opinions, which trump her own. She says she doesn’t feel American, but you know better, even though she’s been Venus a bit longer than you. Wow! Cannot argue with that.

    Back to the thread topic…forgot about her til now, but Davenport is an excellent commentator.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 12, 2012 at 4:12 pm

    Just calling it like I see it brother! Let me add one point. I think most fans don’t really get into womens tennis like they do mens. They watch it and respect it and appreciate the talent and skills on display but very few matches transcend from others. Most matches are just matches. But on occasion there are some very very special womens matches where something special happens and it captivates people. Such as Capriati’s comeback from rock bottom to finally win her first major in Australia…Dokic making her run to the Australian SF after overcoming all the trials and tribulations she went through…Seles comeback to the US Open when she lost in the final to Graf…Serena’s surprise win for her first US Open…Novotna’s Wimbledon win…Venus hasn’t really had a really special, transcending moment since she won her first major titles at each major. She’s had some exciting dramatic wins but not that really special match that captivates the tennis world and sort of overshadows the mens side, as some of the previously mentioned matches have. I think this contributes to the lack of overwhelming crowd support she gets now. (People might be getting a lil bit bored of watching her, fans like to see fresh new young players come up). But again, it’s very hard and very rare for a player to earn overwhelming adoration from tennis fans who for the most part are reserved and not overly expressive like soccer or NFL or boxing fans can be. If Venus doesn’t feel American, what does she feel? I doubt she would say any other nationality. See, it’s kind of silly. Let’s hope she can have a special transcending match which transcends the sport sometime soon in the homestretch of her career. It will be interesting to see how both Venus and Serena make their grand finales from the sport. I’m sure it will be a special and emotional farewell. She and Serena deserve that kind of finale. Agree…I like Davenport in the TV booth too!

  • Dan markowitz · October 12, 2012 at 9:05 pm

    Wow, even from my hospital bed after having my hip resurfaced–I just did a gingerly walk around the halls here on crutches–I have to chime in on this lively discussion. I saw Venus play Clisters a few years ago at the Open and it was clear to me the crowd was pulling for Kim and not Venus. Kim looks the way most people who attend the Open want an American girl to look. She also had the comeback-mother angle working for her.

    But even in 2012, I believe most white Americans want black–even superstar athletes–to be suseevient. The Williams sisters rubbed a lot of people in the tennis establishment and a lot of white fans the wrong way. How dare this audacious Richard Williams predicted his daughters were going to smash all the white girls off the court! How dare he market his daughters so brazenly! How dare he had them buck the system and not play the junior circuit. And how dare he order one of his daughters to pull out of Indian Wells and then for Venus and Serena to boycott the event afterward.

    A lot of people have never forgiven Richard or his daughters since. I think it’s fair to say that we tend to root and identify with people–athletes included–who look and act like we do. I always liked McEnroe because I look and act like him to a certain degree. How many more white people liked Larry Bird better than Magic?

    Venus was an incredibly exciting player when she broke onto the scene, but to root for her meant that you had to root against American darlings like Capriati and even Graf. Venus has become a lot less electric, but maybe because she’s not such a threat to dominate the women’s game, more fans are in her corner now.

    As far as feeling like an American, just go visit a foreign country other than Canada and you’ll realize what are distinctly American traits. We like to feel safe and the status quo for the most part. We also like Mardy Fish or James Blake-like players, who behave themselves and play with a certain sense of decency.

    Finally, Julian , are you related to Arthur Ashe’s historic coach from Richmond, Dr. Robert Johnson?

  • Julian Johnson · October 12, 2012 at 10:27 pm

    Yes.

  • Dan markowitz · October 13, 2012 at 12:42 am

    Im not saying Americans are inherently rascist, but 100+ years of treating blacks at best as second-class students cannot be erased so easily. When you think of the barriers the Williams sisters broke down over the past 15 it’s pretty miraculous. Venus and Serena have opened the gates to many young black women tennis players–like Ashe 30 years before them–and their impact has been almost on the same par as Connors and JMac.

  • Steve · October 13, 2012 at 12:55 am

    Dan, can you get your brain resurfaced while still at the hospital? It might make for more coherent posts. 🙂 Seriously, feel better soon!

  • zoozoo · October 13, 2012 at 4:46 am

    Dan, good to see you jumping in. Julian was doing a terrific job but it’s tough when faced with such implicit racism and ignorance.

    But I guess it’s not surprising coming from someone who so blindly worships JMac and thinks it’s a privilege to listen to him. 0_0

    For what it’s worth, I’m not particularly a fan of Venus. Or Serena. I have found their attitude off putting at times but from my perch up here in Canada, I can absolutely objectively see the problem of racism in the US and I can understand why the sisters might feel the way they do. They seem to have inspired a number of African American girls to take up tennis so hopefully these new young players will have an easier time of it and something positive can come out of the Williams’ legacy (besides their own tremendously impressive tennis records).

    And I quite like John McEnroe too. He can be a little over the top and I sometimes wish he would shut up and let the tennis match be the star of the show but I do enjoy listening to him. Much more so than his arrogant brother. My favourites though are Robbie Koenig and Jason Goodall. I’m always thrilled when one of the streams I pick up has them commentating.

  • Julian Johnson · October 13, 2012 at 5:45 am

    Dan, it was nice to read that you had an understanding of what I was saying. It reminds me that I am not crazy; the world does a good job of that every day.

    Gore Vidal called this country “The United States of Amnesia” and, sadly, I am reminded of this every day. This conversation has reminded me of that.

    “History is over, it has no relevance;” especially the”critical” history that must be buried at all cost. The myth, the noble fairy tale is the only history worth telling and it is composed of many lies.

    My grandfather and father coached/supported Althea Gibson, Arthur Ashe and many other black players when the white tennis community said “you can’t play in our events.” Times have changed, but from my vantage point, the society nor the sport have changed nearly enough.

  • Dan markowitz · October 13, 2012 at 11:12 am

    I remember reading a book about Arthur Ashe when I was a kid and it detailed young Arthur going to your grandfather’s house in Richmond and training. The book chronicled how Dr. Johnson was a real disciplinarian. That slim book gave a very good insight into Ashe ‘s challenge.

    I don’t pretend to know the prejudice a black man faces in this country. But to say that Venus was treated with open arms by American fans is incredulous. I wrote a feature article for the New York Times in the 80’s and I remember Todd Nelson, a black player of some merit, reaming AA because he told him not to forego college for the pro tour when he was announcing on tv about the great prospects of young white players. So black players feel prejudice not only from whites but from their own race, too.

  • Steve · October 13, 2012 at 11:39 am

    “I always liked McEnroe because I look and act like him to a certain degree.” Really? That’s kinda pathetic. I like Henin cause of her game not cause I act like her or look like her. But you often write about the superficial aspects of tennis: Looks, style, losing streaks. lol

    “We also like Mardy Fish” Who is “we”. No one outside of a tennis nut knows who Mardy Fish is. I get asked every slam for updates on the WIlliams sisters at work. They are much loved in my world. It sucks that Venus doesn’t feel it. They are the only winners we have in US tennis despite Sock/Oudin :-). America loves winners.

1 2

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com
To top