Tennis Prose




Nov/14

3

ATP World Tour Finals London

0607-113437
The ATP World Tour Finals will be hosted for the sixth year at the 02 Arena in London.

Here are the two round-robin groups

Group A: Novak Djokovic, Tomas Berdych, Marin Cilic, Stanilas Wawrinka.

Group B: Roger Federer, Andy Murray, Kei Nishikori, Milos Raonic.

Alternates: David Ferrer, Feliciano Lopez.

Interestingly, Tsonga and Gulbis declined their invitations to be alternates.

London’s six years is the longest host of the WTF since Frankfurt (90-95). Other WTF host sites since – Lisbon (2000), Sydney, Shanghai, Houston. New York was the longest running WTF site (77-89).

Did you know the first WTF was held in Tokyo in ’70? Paris, Barcelona, Boston, Melbourne, Stockholm, Houston hosted before Madison Square Garden took over in 77.

No tags

89 comments

  • Dan Markowitz · November 5, 2014 at 8:34 am

    What tournament is more important, Scoop, in the scheme of the ATP hierarchy, the one in London or the one in Knoxville. I tell you I find a subterranean interest in the play of the Challengers and even the Futures. I see Rubin couldn’t get out of the Qualis of a challenger again. The competition is good if not great anything past that.

    Harry has Mannarino who has interestingly come to the States to play Knoxville. Should be interesting. Will Harry pick up his game after losing to many of the lower-rungs to compete with a Main Draw slam player? Manny is tough and his lefty forehand will probably poke many holes in Harry’s backhand.

    Ginepri keeps losing in the first round of these Challengers. Interesting that he feels compelled to go on. Maybe he feels his game is picking up little by little and he can be the American version of Tommy Haas. I now have another player who piques my interest in Daniel Nguyen. How has he made it so far, at least a main draw challenger player, with a game that is so doomed to fail–charging the net constantly when small of stature–at this level. He took the first set off of Donaldson and then got slammed 1 and 2.

    There is curiosity now–which of the young Americans will make it–Donaldson, Kozlov, Tiafoe, Mmoh or Rubin–and who will ascend the highest of this foursome. Will any be a Top 20 or 10 player?

  • Dan Markowitz · November 6, 2014 at 7:15 am

    Harry lost to Manny 1 and 1 in Knoxville. I think Harry’s career–or at least its place in the Top 100–is over. I know he’s only 22 but when you lose 1 and 1 on home soil to the No. 61st-ranked player in the world, it’s time to pack it in and go back to college or get a teaching pro gig.

    Harry is so far down–he’s No. 186 and behind Americans like Chase Buchanan now–that he’s not coming back. His descent is one of hubris, the guy just plays a game with no backbone in it. He thinks he’s the Second Coming of Andy Roddick so he tried to play like Roddick without a complete game. Sad to see, but Harry is done. I said once that Fed was dead, and I was kind of wrong, but Harry is definitely done.

  • Andrew Miller · November 6, 2014 at 1:17 pm

    Not for me to call a player’s career over at 22. Mannarino is a fine player, but a one and one loss stinks (I’m sure Harrison broke a whole bag of racquets after the loss). Safe to say Harrison’s road back will be and already is hard – but maybe it’s a challenge worthy of the player. Could take one, two years, but this “prodigy to dumpster diver to redeemed player” story is part of every U.S. player’s DNA. Pick any player – even Sampras – and you see the fall from grace, struggle, redemption pattern. Sometimes the comeback is brief, like Ginepri, who hit the top 20 and the U.S. Open semifinals and then declined again. Or brief like Sampras, whose two year sub performance then saw him winning the U.S. Open against an old rival (or you could say Sampras never really left, given it was his third U.S. open final in a row – 2000, 2001, 2002), but for Sampras it was “awful” until the victory.

    So even if the player’s arc may ultimately be in deep-six territory, or black holes or whatever, seriously – pick any U.S. player, from Connors to Harrison, and you see the same thing. Capriati had the same career arc (even if she was already “back” before she started winning slams). Sure the “details” matter for every player, but you have to believe that at some point, the player will get some positive momentum where small wins become bigger and bigger ones until they are back full time. It may be a brief trip back but I bet it will be a great one.

    If I were worrying about any players from the U.S., I’d worry about Rhyne Williams and Sandgren. A year ago they were on the verge of the top 100 for Williams and top 200 for Sandgren and now their results aren’t there, at all. They are both in sub 200 rankings, and other U.S. players will be passing them by soon.

    Hey, the match-fixing scandals are really gaining traction. They are a little “dated” – they took place five, six years ago – and seem primarily focused on the Italian players – but they are a black mark on the sport. Some of the stuff that takes place in the dark corners of the game eventually grab bigger players – maybe when someone rats out another player. I’d expect there’s a whale to be caught somewhere , that the whale isn’t a previous question mark like Davydenko (who I still don’t think did anything) and that it’s not isolated.

  • Andrew Miller · November 6, 2014 at 1:24 pm

    Don’t think Harrison’s game is like Roddick’s at all, not even that he tries to play like him. I think he blows up at people like Roddick and that it’s a punk like behavior (and that he hasn’t “mastered” the blow up like Federer, who uses the bad vibes to stay focused), and that it isn’t pretty when he does it. But I don’t think his game is Roddick’s at all.

    I thought Harrison’s game looked better and that it looked like he was implementing some things that his coaches asked for, especially in the Virginia challenger. However I don’t think he’s quite “mastered” the new tactics and that it’s probably pretty easy for him to slip back to past tactics/ways of playing. Kind of like the Mardy Fish forehand – it was “repaired” and then came undone and then was repaired again, something that took place almost every match. I think it’s a lot different from Djokovic, who had a great serve, then worked with Todd Martin and had a lousy one. The switch back to “great serve” was possible and permanent because Djokovic’s original motion was a solid one.

    Anyways, enough on Harrison. He doesn’t deserve the ink for now. That said I think he will earn it for good play, maybe in a year or two years he’ll have a good comeback.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 6, 2014 at 3:55 pm

    Gotta disagree with you here, Andrew. No one has had a fall from grace the way Harry has this year. This is a guy who was the Next Big American male player, and now he’s losing to teens and getting absolutely demolished by a journeyman like Manny. Sampras won the US Open at 19, how you can compare him to Harry. Even DY wasn’t losing this bad at 22. I don’t think Harry has the stomach for a big comeback.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 6, 2014 at 6:51 pm

    Are you kidding? Harry not have the heart? He got to top 50 once he can surely do it again. Only a fool would write off a feisty fighter like Harrison.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 6, 2014 at 8:47 pm

    Harry is done, finis. He will never play in a main draw of a slam again on his own ranking.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 7, 2014 at 8:28 am

    Dan what does Vince think of Harrison? Boy if you are right this will be a USTA disaster, and one of the biggest flops in ATP history. So much was expected. Can’t think of a bigger flop, even Dokic and Lucic ended up coming back and achieving some success later. Alexandra Stevenson was a pretty big disappointment, going from Wimbledon SF to oblivion. But on the mens side, what do you think has been the biggest flop? Brian Vahaly made SF of Indian Wells one year but that was almost a fluke I guess you could say. He came out of college and nothing was really expected of him.

  • dan markowitz · November 7, 2014 at 11:38 am

    Good call on Vahaly, Scoop. He was around for a while though after that I think. Don’t know what Vince thinks of Harry.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 8, 2014 at 9:43 am

    How about Federer being one of the first to congratulate Djokovic on the birth of son Stefan, nice class from Fed. Wonder if Boris is a little miffed at the name choice )

  • Andrew Miller · November 8, 2014 at 12:31 pm

    Pat Rafter is now head of tennis australia player development. Thought this quote was very funny without it intending to be. I get what Rafter is saying – he is talking about pro player development for the women’s tour and australian prospects. But it sounds like something else entirely! Here it is. “The women is an area that I’ve got to get more into. Over the next two months I’m going to have to really dig deep into that, because it’s probably an area that I have not been exposed to very much.” Translation: women confuse me, dont get me wrong i love them, i am married to my wife etc but frankly i have no idea about them. Funny how it could be interpreted.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 9, 2014 at 4:39 pm

    Groth-mania, baby! My main man, Sam Groth, who has the biggest serve in the game, took out Alex Ramos in the first round of the Open this year, is into the finals of the Challenger in Knoxville. He routined Smycezk in the semis and is facing Mannarino in the finals today.

    To give you an idea of how much better a regular tour player, a lower-ranked one like Mannarino, is than Challenger players, Manny has gone three matches in this Challenger losing a total 11 games. Guys like Harry and Broady, they make Manny look like he’s the Second Coming of Henri Leconte.

    Let’s go Groth, one of T-P’s 5 favorite players on the tour, including D. Brown, Monfils, Kyrgios and Estrella-Burgos.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 9, 2014 at 5:38 pm

    Jarmere Jenkins update: He opted for Australian Chally swing because he wanted to get away from US swing where it’s the same players beating up on each other week after week. Was training hard with Mitchell Kruger and a USTA developmental coach.

  • Andrew Miller · November 9, 2014 at 9:35 pm

    Big tour news:
    Federer shows that you never forget a loss and beats Raonic in the WTF. Nishikori takes out Murray

    How about Kvitova and Safarova and team Czech Republic. They really took it to Germany to win Fed Cup. The Czech Republic has become like a Switzerland in women’s tennis, maybe this is a preview of what team Switzerland will do to France. I think France will win but they have zero champions.

    Challenger news:

    JJ doing well on the Oz challenger and futures circuit in Australia. He rode a lot of momentum to make the first Traralgon finals vs. Klahn, but both of them lost in rd 2 of this week’s challenger. Still worth the risk.

    Pierre Hughes Herbert won a challenger in France. Gojo won a challenger in Bratislava. The European challengers still look harder than both the U.S. and Australian challengers – no surprise to me that Mannarino is winning Knoxville and Klahn is winning Traralgon – Europe seems to have the top circuit, then the U.S., then probably Australia, then South America, then the Far East (random parts of Asia, including the Japan challenger Klahn’s currently playing).

    Nice performance both by James Ward and Liam Broady, they are posting good results on the challengers. A nod also to Smyczek – I know no one wants to sing the praises of Smyczek, but he is looking very Iron Mike.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 10, 2014 at 3:08 am

    You’ve got to hand it to Mannarino. He dropped his first set of the Challenger in Knoxville to Groth, but then won out. If you look at his game, you’d think he’s a slim guy who hits the French way, kind of a cross between Simon and Santoro with a little leftiness thrown in, but the guy is smooth. If he were an American, he’d probably be the No. 2-4 guy.

    JJ didn’t play Challenger in Japan. Klahn lost in first round, so Klahn was not nearly as successful in this year’s Far East Challenger stint. If you look at Klahn, Kudla, Rhyne Williams and Harry, they have really had down years and don’t look like they’re going to be a Top 70 factor either for a long time or ever again.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 10, 2014 at 8:40 am

    Raonic’s game seems to suit Fed perfectly, he seems to thrive vs. Raonic except for the one match in Bercy. Petr Pala is doing a terrific job with taht Czech Rep Fed Cup team, talk about dynasties. The Czechs are great in tennis and hockey, the leading NHL scorer is the Flyers Fed Fan Jacub Voracek. JJ likes playing Down Under for some reason. Smyczek is Mr Consistency. Hope he can become the American Ferrer.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 10, 2014 at 8:43 am

    Mannarino is a class player, he was top 40 or 50 at one point maybe even 30. In other news, I have been told the famous historic Sarasota Bath & Racquet is about to shut down, losing tons of money. It has over 30 Har Tru courts, Agassi Maria and Courier played USTA junior events there. Navratilova was a member a few years ago, so is Jimmy Arias. But it’s shutting down. Tennis clubs seem to be becoming risky business these days.

  • Andrew Miller · November 10, 2014 at 2:12 pm

    Dan’s totally right about the down year for the U.S. challenger players not named Steve Johnson and Jack Sock (Tentatively feel that the other talented lefty is staying on the ATP). However I give a pass to Kudla (illness – mono) and more or less to all of them, from Klahn through Rhyne Williams and Harrison because of their age. The tour rewards experience so I’d expect they don’t get too comfortable on the challenger circuit and prove, like Groth, that they can up their game.

    Maybe the Australian challenger players are a lot better than I give them credit for. Millman won a challenger, following up his strong performance in California. I still think the European challenger players are the tops, maybe that’s why Goffin, by doing amazing in the hardest challengers, is beating big players on the ATP and other players like Carreno Busta are top 50.

    Too early to write off the U.S. challenger playters for me, none of these guys are the 2nd coming of Tommy Ho, David Witt or Al Parker Jr. or Ivan Baron or who-ever – they haven’t peaked yet (certainly not at the junior level and not now, so there’s some room for improvement). They also aren’t content like a few U.S. players that stuck around the 90s in the ranking but never really threatened to do much better (not naming them but you know who they are – they aren’t Mike Russell but they are always around the 90s to 120s range – again they are never relevant but always maintain a decent ranking). To me the odd man out is Rhyne Williams – he had been doing well, beating players like Ginepri, Dancevic, playing tough and into the top 110 or so, and now he’s out of the top 200. Other players in the 200s are improving, even Sandgren (who as expected did well in Knoxville). If you think some player’s confidence is in the dumps, I’m thinking the player most in the dumps is Rhyne Williams, seeing players like Chase Buchanan (no offense) do better. While Buchanan is a steady performer I think I prefer to go to the dentist than watch a Buchanan match.

    WTF news: Wawrinka d. Berdych 6-1 6-1 in 58+ minutes. Either Wawrinka is getting himself ready for Davis Cup through the WTF or Berdych is under-whelming again. He is awful when anything huge is on the line.

  • Andrew Miller · November 10, 2014 at 2:16 pm

    Czech women rule! Expect Kvitova, Safarova to have a big 2015 – probably another slam for Kvitova and another slam semi for Safarova.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 10, 2014 at 4:27 pm

    Look does this confirm Cilic was on steroids at the US Open!!? How can you go beat down on Fed and Nishikori at the Open and then lose like Harry 1 and 1 to Djoko? I mean, come on, that’s ridiculous, a US Open champ getting destroyed at the WTF Finals. What kind of game and guts does Cilic have to get rolled like that?

  • Andrew Miller · November 10, 2014 at 6:44 pm

    Could just be djok is the goat of indoors. Maybe playing as a dad has brought back the champ in him.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 10, 2014 at 7:56 pm

    Remember that former WTA player suggested on Facebook she thought Uniqlo wanted Kei to be in the US Open final not Djokovic. Sounded crazy but beginning to wonder. Remember Djokovic almost gleefully saying it’s great for the company that Kei won. Found that odd.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 10, 2014 at 8:50 pm

    I don’t believe that for a second, but Cilic’s win now looks suspicious to me.

  • Russeljones · November 11, 2014 at 4:01 am

    I think it’s dangerous to talk about steroids. Cilic is having a hard time adjusting, and he is by far not the first to have a hard time adjusting, to life as a Slam winner. I notice a tendency for people to forget his good form up to and including the US Open. It is as if he flashed bright for two weeks and that was it. I am saddened by his meek display in recent weeks but it is what it is.

    I expect Nishikori to provide a very stern test for Federer. The young Japanese seems to be in the form of his life this year and he’s liking this surface. It might be a tad on the slow side for Roger and that will suit Kei very nicely.

    Murray should be able to win his match and leave us with an interesting set of permutations for the group’s second spot.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 11, 2014 at 7:39 am

    Cilic has probably had a letdown. For certain players like him it’s such a relief and joy to win that elusive first major that the drive and desire loses some intensity and that fraction loss can be the fine line between GREAT tennis like Cilic showed and where he’s at now. We saw this with Gaudio, Safin, Goran, Kvitova, T Johansson, Korda, etc. I think Cilic will show us his REAT tennis again but maybe not for a while. Players like Fed Djok and Rafa are the rare exceptions, their hunger and drive to win more and more is freakishly extraordinary, as is their talent.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 11, 2014 at 8:26 am

    How about Nadal getting stem cell therapy on his ailing back? I didn’t even know his back was bad. This guy is going through a lot of health issues: back, appendix, wrist and knee. One has to wonder if he’ll be playing when he’s Fed’s age.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 11, 2014 at 8:32 am

    Stem cell is the way to go. I was told Peyton Manning had stem cell used on his neck. Look at him now as good as ever. I’m sure Nadal will be playing well into his thirties, at least let’s hope so.

  • Russeljones · November 11, 2014 at 10:51 am

    Stem cell is good, I agree. Especially from an ethical stand point. I was alarmed that Nadal could be getting human growth hormone treatment as it is known that such treatment results in far greater benefits for the athlete and is not limited to the treatment of a particular injury.

  • Andrew Miller · November 11, 2014 at 3:28 pm

    For cilic i buy the post slam win depression. Wawrinka hasnt been like his slam winner self – he has been very good but not very outstanding.

    Fed destroyed kei in 68 minutes. Wonder if fed and wawrinka really are using this as a warm up for davis cup, they are beating the daylights out of their early rd wtf opponents. Either that or getting their competitor back for “past wrongs”. They say players have short memories but doubt it with the champs…they ALWAYS pay it back (unless it is fed vs nadal in which case repaying a favor proves improbable if not impossible most of the time ).

  • Andrew Miller · November 11, 2014 at 3:37 pm

    Go Austin Krajicek. He is winning in the european challengers against the toughest opponents . Probably the most under the radar, under estimated u.s. player, who because of the lack of the spotlight is quietly closing in on the top 100. Unlike his peers he isnt in illinois (kudla is javong a modest comeback ) and unlike klahn he isnt facing lighter competition . Saw that a few u.s. players are south of the border as well i think in ecuador, good for them.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 11, 2014 at 6:04 pm

    Austin Krajicek’s name keeps popping up. He was totally under the radar type player, no pressure or expectations from media or fans. This might be the best route for young Americans, stay under the radar.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 11, 2014 at 7:59 pm

    Uh, Krajicek hasn’t beaten a player ranked inside the Top 200 in any of these last few Challengers. The guy’s 24 and ranked No. 154. I’d be very surprised if he does much more than cracking the Top 100. He lost to Dustin Brown 3 and 6 in one of the Euro C’s. I wouldn’t be forecasting this dude to soaring new levels.

    Geez, James McGee had a bad Challenger swing here over the last few weeks. I think he won only one match in three tries. Noah Rubin qualied in Champaign. How does this guy have time to play the qualis at all these Challengers and go to college?

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 11, 2014 at 8:32 pm

    Krajicek and JP Smith made SF or F at Newport doubles too. He’s showing he can win some matches. More than Harrison has shown lately. Smyczek came out of nowhere really. Maybe Krajicek will shock the world 🙂

  • Andrew Miller · November 12, 2014 at 12:37 am

    If Dustin Brown beat Nadal I sure hope he beats Krajicek 3 and 3. Last year around this time we had a conversation about Jiri Vesely and how he basically entered the top 80 on the back of clay challenger wins vs. no names – he didn’t beat ANY top 100 players and had an 0 and 7 (that’s right – WINLESS) record on the ATP tour in 2013, riding all of that, a slew of challenger wins versus low ranked players and a fruitless effort on the ATP tour to a very respectable #83 ranking. One year later Vesely, all of age 21, is now a top 70 player at #68 (a modest 15 point ranking improvement), but what a different year it has been – he’s 16-17 on the tour (still on the losing end, but a LOT better than 0 for 7) and he has bagged many more wins against top 100 players (even a Monfils win at the big W), and certainly more wins against players with a higher ranking than he has – good reason his ranking went up – he’s better this year than last.

    so here we have Krajicek, who has basically followed a Vesely pattern by going deep in European challenger tournaments (not winning them like Vesely but going deep and seeing a nice rankings boost). These are the same tournaments that David Goffin rose to a top 22 ranking (and a credible one). It’s nice to see a U.S. player brave the European circuit – hardly anyone does it, maybe out of homesickness or the super high costs.

    Fact is he’s made a dent and passed a lot of players whose names take a lot of space and a lot of mindshare. Is he Kyrgios? No. Kokkinakis? Kokki beat him this year too. But he is winning and winning gives confidence, and confidence is a good train for any player.

    Some other interesting matches:
    Donaldson-Jaziri. I think Jaziri would have this match.
    Mannarino-Ram. I’d think Mannarino has this too.
    Rubin-Dancevic – here is a real match for Rubin!

    How about Berankis. I think he’s positioned for a nice comeback in 2015, he has been doing well every challenger.

  • jblitz · November 12, 2014 at 1:11 am

    Dan – “I don’t believe that for a second, but Cilic’s win now looks suspicious to me.”

    Why are your suspicions limited to only some players? Like the ones who beat Federer? If I was suspicious of anybody it would be Federer himself who seems to have found some magic youth potion.

    Dan – “How about Nadal getting stem cell therapy on his ailing back? I didn’t even know his back was bad. This guy is going through a lot of health issues: back, appendix, wrist and knee. One has to wonder if he’ll be playing when he’s Fed’s age.”

    Maybe Fed will share some of his magic potion with Rafa. 😉 How could you not have known about his back? I’ve talked about it myself right here on this forum. Rafa has struggled with his back since the Australian Open and it’s been obvious throughout the year that it wasn’t right. He hasn’t talked about it much because he didn’t want to make excuses but it hasn’t been hidden. In spite of all his problems he’s done really well – one slam plus a final; one masters and two other finals; a 500 and a 250 in six months – yeah, he’s done. I can hardly wait to see what a hopefully healthy Rafa can do next year.

  • jblitz · November 12, 2014 at 1:23 am

    Russeljones – “Stem cell is good, I agree. Especially from an ethical stand point. I was alarmed that Nadal could be getting human growth hormone treatment as it is known that such treatment results in far greater benefits for the athlete and is not limited to the treatment of a particular injury.”

    Oh for crying out loud. Rafa was NOT getting HGH treatment, he had PRP therapy treatments, just like hundreds of other tennis players and thousands of other pro athletes. They are not the same thing. HGH is a banned drug, PRP therapy is acceptable and allowed by WADA, the ATP, the IOC, and virtually all sports organizations around the world. Where do you guys get such nasty slanderous garbage about Rafa and why are you so anxious to spread it around about only him? Don’t bother answering that because I know where and it’s a slimy hate filled cesspool.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 12, 2014 at 5:29 am

    Uh JBlitz, it’s not like this guy Federer hasn’t played well before in the past. Look, Fed’s not beyond suspicion, but where in his past–unlike Nadal–has he pulled out of slams with mysterious injuries before? Where is the Spanish drug connection? Where are the preternatural muscles and body build at the age of 16? Where’s all the joint (knee, wrist) problems?

    Fed could be on something, but in my mind it’s not as likely as Nadal.

  • jblitz · November 12, 2014 at 9:03 am

    Excuse me Dan, but Nadal has played pretty damn well in the past too, especially against Federer whom he has beaten 23 times. And which mysterious injuries did Rafa have that caused him to pull out of slams? Just because YOU don’t follow any tennis players besides Americans doesn’t mean that there wasn’t a plethora of information about all of Nadal’s injuries.

    What Spanish drug connection with Rafa has there ever been? You’ve repeated this slime before and several people on this forum, including me, have set you straight but you continue to debase yourself and this forum. There is no more of a Rafa Spanish drug connection than there is a Mardy Fish American drug connection, or Isner because he lives in Florida where there was a drug scandal or any American west coast player because of Balco.

    Preternatural body build? Do I really have to dig up some pictures & videos of Rafa at 16 to disprove your garbage? He had a big left bicep and has always had a big butt but he’s actually quite slim and doesn’t have anywhere near a body builder type body. Hell, 17 yr old Borna Coric is more ripped than Rafa is or ever was. Google Coric images and check out the 1st picture in the 8th row, or check out the pic in this article. http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/10/borna-coric-rafael-nadal-teenager-upset-swiss-open

    Are you referring to Federer being lucky that he’s never had knee or wrist injuries? Fed’s had back injuries since he was a teenager. OMG! That proves it! Fed’s doping!!??!!! Delpo’s had major wrist injuries! He’s doping too!!??!! You’re too ridiculous for words.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 12, 2014 at 9:19 am

    Federer looking lethal in London so far. He could pull a Rosewall and keep doing this for another 5-7 years. He really can. The drive is still there, if the body holds up, he will be around beyond the next OLY mark my words. Is there a ban on wearing all whites at WTF, every player has the fancy color combos. Kei has most white but not quite all white. Missing the all white outfits.

  • Andrew Miller · November 12, 2014 at 10:28 am

    Another day, another pair of wins from challenger player Berankis and Krajicek. As said before even a park win fills the confidence tank – even a doubles park parkwin.

    Berdych looks on his way to beating Cilic. With each win Cilic is looking loke Andres Gomez, one slam man.

  • Dan Markowitz · November 12, 2014 at 10:41 am

    JBlitz,

    The Wimbledon pull out a few years ago just after he won the French is the one I’ve always been suspicious of. As said before, until that list comes out–and I don’t care if Nadal is calling for it to come out. Rafael Palmeiro swore before a Congressional hearing that he’d never taken steroids–with all the names on it, Nadal is suspect in my book.

    And, it would not surprise me in the least if Delpo was found to have taken steroids. Argentinian players, as Spadea said in “Break Point,” until his lawyers took it out of the book, are guilty before proven innocent when it comes to PED use. There’s been a plethora who have been caught.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 12, 2014 at 11:11 am

    Where there is smoke there’s fire. There’s a lot of smoke…

  • Andrew Miller · November 12, 2014 at 11:33 am

    Nice to kick a player when down. Nadal has played pretty bad ball the entire year, consistent with injuries. He looked awful im Australia, wasnt quite his clay self even with the French Open win, played a miserable grass season and am equally uninspired hard court and indoor season however brief. Point is the guy is ailing.

    He has had for the most part a dog year that has put in question the abilitt to get the goat slam record given the repeating injuries. I dont think his awful play is consistent with a doping player but it is consistent with an injured player. Some of the ailments seem odd like the wrist injury but so many players have wrist problems, so it is a lot more common.

    Now i am no partisan for all thing Nadal – he is one of the great champions but i am not a top fan . But i do think objectively his year in comparison to last year has been bad. It isnt strange when looking at other players best years – the next year inevitably is a down year ( see wilander and his three slam followed by no slam years ). Nadal has seemed both physically and mentally tired this year. He seemed to play earnestly in the indoors even if he isnt that interested in the indoor season .

    Id say give the guy a break. I dont believe del potro is doping but who knows. Nice guy cilic did , so too troicki (sure there isnt a serbia/croatia problem here?). And what if troicki apologist djokovic is too, protecting or speaking up for troicki rather than the evidence that his fellow serb was popping a pill or two? Djokovic didnt look big…he looked like a cover up leader. So beware of pointing fingers at nadal who says punish wrongdoers in spain – and think about djokovic a little more. I dont think he is guilty of anything but his defense of davis cup player troicki was borderline unethical . If he took troicki at his word then it was admirable but stupid, if he didnt look at the facts he was also naive, and if he did look at then he knew exactly what they were and went for pride over truth. None of that speaks much for djokovic .

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 12, 2014 at 12:46 pm

    Wait a minute…Nadal played bad ball this year? He made finals in Aussie Open but got blitzed by a great player who was coming off the best win of his career and he was playing an even better final until Rafa stopped the match with a supposed back injury. Rafa looked great on clay and though he looked somewhat vulnerable he still won the French Open. Expect Rafa to storm back stronger than ever next year.

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 12, 2014 at 1:02 pm

    Austin Krajicek beat Arnaboldi in Brescia Italy Challenger, Arnaboldi is the tricky lefty who beat Sock this year in Sarasota. Seeing a lot of name players grinding it out in these Challengers this week. Funny how the players used to complain about the length of the season but look how many of them are out there this week in Nov. trying to get more points to up their rankings. Maybe there should be NO off season. These players love to play. )

  • Andrew Miller · November 12, 2014 at 2:08 pm

    Nadal played a lot of bad ball this year. He grinded out the AO to the final (Nishikori and Dimitrov both had him on the ropes for periods – I thought Dimitrov would get him but he stopped playing brave ball and began to misfire on his big serve big forehand combos…the Dimitrov game unraveled in his first ever slam QF, but at least Dimitrov learned from it and put together his best ever year.). Nadal didn’t look like himself in the AO and I think he didn’t look like himself the whole year with the exception of a great French Open in the final rounds and a great match vs Rosol. Otherwise he looked very beatable and very vulnerable.

    I’m used to Nadal the conquistador not Nadal the hobbling player – this year was the year of Nadal the hobbling player. Frankly I’d be surprised if he finds his form earlier than March 2015, but the Nadal team has surprised before. I’d think they would be pragmatic and take it easy, even if the ranking drops, for the early part of 2015 and make a come back through the South American clay circuit – arrive in Indian Wells in stronger form, play a good two back to back Masters and finally win Miami, then enter the rest of the clay season and build momentum there tournament by tournament. Mere speculation on my part but I think team Nadal pushed their luck this year in the first half of the year and paid the price on the back six months in the form of poor results, blamed rightfully I think on injuries (no way Nadal loses to Coric in their first ever match with a prepared Nadal, I don’t care what surface).

    So yes, I believe “bad ball” for Nadal this year. Great season for anyone not named “Rafael Nadal” and some “shining victories” like Roland Garros, but all in all a downer of a year (and by downer I think you can even exclude the Australian Open loss to Wawrinka and still consider the year “bad for Nadal”).

    In defense of jblitz (one time only) it is accurate that Nadal considers he’s playing well if he feels 100% – if it’s only minor injuries and his emotions and play are both positive and in tune, aka good feelings, good practice, good everything, good results – the flow.

    Anyways, on to better topics like Krajicek. Yes, I like his approach on the Europe circuit. He may not be facing down Mannarino on an indoor Illinois court, but he is winning his matches on the hardest challenger route, even if he’s facing lower ranked players that he should beat. You can’t dispute winning – it speaks for itself. I’d congratulate Mannarino also for deciding, rather than facing his friends on the Euro circuit, to cast his die on the U.S. circuit. I think the Illinois results should be interesting – wonder how far Donaldson, Rubin can go.

    Speaking of Euro players, why doesn’t Berdych hire Navratilova? She seems to like seeing Mauresmo’s Murray success (and by all measures it IS successful, he has “come back” to relevance). She is in every way the equal of Lendl in terms of tennis knowledge, she understands the game back and forth. Berydch with the Cilic win in WTF shows he still has something in the tank and he seems to understand the urgency of getting a slam when the opportunity is there (such as the 2015 Australian if Nadal doesn’t play). They are both Czech, there’s no worm involved.

    Someone should tweet “Berdych, hire Navratilova!”

  • Scoop Malinowski · November 12, 2014 at 6:08 pm

    If Stan chokes the Aus Open final or plays like his normal self, Rafa wins two majors this year. But Stan played the match of his LIFE. I really think the booing of Rafa after he took the eight minute time out (for what C Rochus said to “take a shot”) messed him up mentally. It’s a devastating thing for a proud sensitive champion like Rafa to be booed. Still a strong year for Rafa, just Fed and Djokovic had a little bit better years.

  • Andrew Miller · November 12, 2014 at 10:07 pm

    Scores. Djokovic d. Wawrinka 6-3 6-0. Wawrinka won’t be part of any Davis Cup victory with that kind of scoreline. This following the Berdych blowout of Cilic. The two new champs are playing like pseudo top ten players.

    Illinois Champaign challenger results:
    Kudla d. Hiltzik in suprisingly tough match. H. is a tough player, he beat Giron last year and had a few good tournaments as a freshman and Kalmazoo champ like Rubin.

    Jaziri d. Donaldson in a tough three set match. Donaldson’s best move was hiring Taylor Dent.

    Dancevic d. Rubin e-z.

    Giron wins! Mannarino d. Ram in 3. Good effort from dependable Ram.

  • Andrew Miller · November 12, 2014 at 10:16 pm

    Wawrinka won his Australian outright, even with a Nadal that wasn’t himself the whole tournament – I don;t think anyone was going to deny him. He had already beat the best Australian Open player of the last few years in Djokovic, don’t think he was settling for 2nd place.

    Only that after winning it, it was as if there was no where else to go. Unfortunately for Wawrinka, other top players knew otherwise – tennis is always a what have you done for me lately sport! You beat a player and that player is looking to get you back next time around, so Wawrinka seemed to pay dearly for the lapse. Like the Hunger Games: Catching Fire scene:

    “This trip doesn’t end when you get back home…You NEVER get off this train!”

    I mean players do through retirement, but the dynamic of the sport is such that a player meets a rival next tournament and the situation offers an opportunity – either repeat or get bested by an opponent with a new strategy etc, desire whatever. Remember Roddick in 2003, loses to Henman in one warm up to the U.S. Open. Next tournament, U.S. Open, he gets Henman first round and reverses the result on the way to the championship.

  • Thomas Tung · November 12, 2014 at 10:31 pm

    Don’t mean to interrupt this great discussion thread, but it looks like Robin Soderling has (more or less) decided to call it a day, he’s now the tournament director for the Stockholm Open:

    https://twitter.com/rsoderling (check out the youtube link there)

    and

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/14/sports/tennis/a-tennis-career-changeover-for-robin-soderling.html?_r=0

    Tommy Robredo was able to make a big comeback, but I’m not so sure if Robin can do so (should he be able to).

1 2

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com
To top