Tennis Prose




Jul/17

9

What if Roger Federer summoned his inner beast… The Rogimal?

fedkarlrWe all know Roger Federer plays tennis like a gentleman wearing a top hat and tuxedo. Heck, maybe someday Nike will design such an outfit for the King.

Federer plays with grace, elegance, perfection. He is a work of art, or as Greg Norman told me, he is “like watching live art.”

But what if Roger Federer found another level? What if Roger Federer round his sixth gear turbo power?

You know, that extra intensity level of emotional adrenaline that Rafa Nadal, Lleyton Hewitt and Serena Williams summoned from deep within.

We rarely ever saw Federer utilize his “beast mode” of physical and emotional fury, vicious grunting and wild-eyed, crazed, obsessed, ferocity.

Federer always plays tennis as if he’s Baryshnikov or Oksana Baiul. Aesthetic beauty.

What if Federer got down and dirty, and found a new level, with the eye of the tiger and pit bull snarl? And used it on those rare occasion when he needed a boost?

Shoot, Fed might have won 30 majors by now.

If Federer added a Jimmy Connors, Hewitt, Serena, Rafa, McEnroe edge to his arsenal he might never lose a match.

No one could beat The Rogimal.

(Federer art by Karl Rosenstock)

· ·

184 comments

  • Duke Carnoustie · July 10, 2017 at 11:01 pm

    Andrew, actually Elina was stopped by Halep’s amazing comeback at RG. But she has to be doubting herself now that these other women are coming up and Ostapepenko – or Alona as I shall refer to her hereafter – is a rising force. Alona looks nothing at all like the player I saw fall apart against CeCe Bellis at Stanford last year.

    The U.S. male player who should be embarrassed is Sock. He’s supposed to be mixing it up at the Dimitrov and Goffin level. Instead those players are miles above him, while Thiem and Zverev have left him in the dust. What has Sock accomplished? Some meaningless 250 tournwy wins. Samimal took out Goffin, Thiem, Kyrgios and Nadal to win his second career 500 this year. Ask yourself if Sock could do that.

  • Chazz · July 10, 2017 at 11:04 pm

    I’m still sticking to my prediction from a few weeks before the start of Wimby: Murray wins it. I hate it, to be honest, but I just have a feeling he finds a way to get it done again. Watch out for Cilic though, he is looking dangerous –
    he hasn’t dropped a set in any of his four matches.

  • Duke Carnoustie · July 10, 2017 at 11:09 pm

    Anyone watching Tennys Sandgren v. Austin Krajicek from Winnetka? Sandgren leads 7-6, 3-4.

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 2:12 am

    Andrew –
    Going back to Kerber – yes, last year she wasn’t pushed around – but her terrible last few months have left their mark on her. This was her first really good match since 2016. And she’s lost to Garbine so many times.
    In her interview she virtually said, I’ve shown I can play again.

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 2:40 am

    Angie will do ok in the future, perhaps win a minor title or two, but she’ll never be the player she was at her best in 2016. More mature, more insightful and so on, but not the same. The memories are never erased.
    Has happened in other sports.

    BTW my two Wimbledon predictions worked out – Nadal won’t win and Kerber’s lost No1. Not rocket science but I just knew Rafa wouldnt make it ๐Ÿ™‚

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 7:13 am

    Based on his form I thought it would be Nadal. Nope! Based on how unlikely it is for a player to win two slams as their first tour tour wins I thought nope! (yet here is Ostapenko, on her way to another brilliant run).
    Based on Querrey’s form coming into Wimbledon I thought unlikely Querrey will be here in second week, showing last year was just a special run. NOPE! Here he is, two time Wimbledon Quarterfinalist and the only USA men’s player to reach a slam QF since 2011. No one else has competed like Querrey.
    Based on her deep runs at other tournaments I thought Pliskova had a chance. Nope!!!

    Tennis is great. Except for Nadal winning the French open most years no one can predict anything.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 7:19 am

    Kerber’s proven she’s top twenty this year. Last year she was the consensus number one. Significantly worse performance. It happens. How could anyone expect her to pull it off again, she would have had to had a lot more help. Muguruza hired Conchita Martinez, Wimbledon champion, to guide her. Kerber would have had to make some major announcement, such as hiring Chris Evert etc or someone else, Henin, Aranxta Sanchez, etc.
    This is all unlikely. Kerber this year is Pre 2016 never won a slam Kerber. It’s just the way it is.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 7:23 am

    Agree with Duke on Sock. He’s playing awful in the heart of the season. To be fair most of his peers played equally poorly, but if Sock has a larger vision of himself as a player on par with Thiem Goffin etc then yes, his performance outside of some decent hard-court tournament results has been dismal.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 7:27 am

    To be fair most USA men played up to their seeding. If top 64 they made second round etc. Sock didn’t. Seems to be the right bar, play at your seeding level.

  • Hartt · July 11, 2017 at 7:51 am

    Andrew, as a Milos fan, I was thrilled that he won against Sascha, especially in match where he was not playing his best and had to gut it out. But I am also a Fed fan, and realistic enough to know that a healthy Fed is a huge favourite over a healthy Milos. I just hope it is a competitive match.

  • Hartt · July 11, 2017 at 7:54 am

    Regarding Federer against these younger players (and they are all younger guys compared to Roger), I thought Pseudofed’s tweet on yesterday’s match put it well. “Honestly, there is nothing more lovely on a sunny day than taking your child to the park to hit a few tennis balls.”

  • Scoop Malinowski · July 11, 2017 at 8:19 am

    Scoop Malinowski writes:

    I would guess Uncle Toni's ego wanted Moya to stay home so he could run the show one last time. Uncle Toni put himself ahead of Rafa's best interests. Rafa could have used Moya's input which could only help. But Uncle Toni's ego was too big (my theory).

  • Hartt · July 11, 2017 at 8:24 am

    Or maybe Moya really did want to have time with his young family. He is not the main coach yet, that is supposed to happen next season. But at Rafa’s stage of his career, does he really need advice on how to do well at a Slam?

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 8:30 am

    Andrew – I think Muguruza brought Conchita on board because Sam wasn’t available.
    Otherwise probably would have been no change.
    So who knows ?

    I’d say Kerber went into 2017 with the same team because that had worked – and it didn’t because something changed in her.
    Whether she takes the step to hire anyone else – would seem put of character and she’d have done it by now.
    Or, what about Boris ? He obviously needs the money ๐Ÿ™‚

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 8:47 am

    Is Radwanska getting married soon ? I know she planned to but must’ve missed the announcement. (no one sent me an invite – shame ! No invite to Andy’s wedding either – maybe it got lost in the post )

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 9:16 am

    Maybe Kerber’s not that good anymore. She was fantastic, now makes routine errors. Anyways she’s become less interesting, becoming part of the blob of players who have consistency issues and courage issues and unable to summon any of their best tennis out there to muster more than a good set here and there.
    Like Sock.
    Or Giorgi.
    Whatever the case Kerber has earned much less ink whether the real thing or the virtual ink. Last year is in the rearview mirror and other players don’t fear her. And shouldn’t.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 9:20 am

    Other players have improved and Kerber has regressed. Her game is watered down enough that it looks like a worse version. This isn’t Kerber 2.0. This is Kerber version pre-slam 2015, where no one cared. Now like me sadly I only care enough to follow her nosedive rather than the non-event of her comeback, which doesn’t exist.
    Konta has become more interesting. Coco has become more interesting. And Kerber has shrunk.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 9:51 am

    Raonic has a shot! He should take it.

  • Hartt · July 11, 2017 at 9:55 am

    Catherine, a commie said that Aga is getting married in a couple weeks to her former hitting partner. Yesterday they showed him watching her match.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 10:27 am

    Muguruza KOs Kuznetsova, now in semis!?! Venus gets 1st set off Ostapenko.
    Djokovic d. Mannarino, into the QFs.
    Harrison and Mike Venus drop first set in their QF.

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 10:36 am

    Oh dear Andrew I don’t lose interest in people as easily as that. Angie will always interest me because she’s a human being and has gone through ups and downs which are in themselves interesting, psychologically. Of course if she won the USO I imagine she’d suddenly become fascinating again, even to you.
    (And I don’t think other players ever ‘feared’ Kerber – she doesn’t have that kind of personality)

    Tennis is in some ways a very snobbish sport where only big wins matter. I don’t see it that way.
    Angie probably won’t be doing that much winning in the future though so I won’t be mentioning her here much either. Not that Konta will take her place – she seems to me flat and uninspiring however many tournaments she racks up. I even find it hard to recall what she looks like.

    I hope Simona beats her. I fact I hope Simona wins the whole thing.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 11:07 am

    Venus downs Ostapenko. Rybarikova,never seen her,up on Coco. One set to zero.

  • Duke Carnoustie · July 11, 2017 at 11:10 am

    Can’t say I expected Venus to straight-set Alona like that. Didn’t see much of it but looked like Venus certainly outserved her.

    Would love to see her win it now.

  • Chazz · July 11, 2017 at 11:19 am

    I’m with Catherine, I want Halep to win the whole thing. It’s her time.

  • Thomas Tung · July 11, 2017 at 12:06 pm

    Catherine, I think that Boris Becker declared bankruptcy in order to evade his financial obligations, probably because he does have the money to pay up, but doesn’t want his capital & assets to be known (the closest example I can think of is Bjorn Borg, who also declared bankruptcy in the late 80s/early 90s, but it was rumored that he had the vast bulk of his fortune in the Channel Islands; possibly Guernsey or Jersey, because he never seemed to be out of cash, or out of any means at all). Borg got into business after the end of his tennis career, and he had a few failed companies under his belt (remember BBDG — Bjorn Borg Design Group). Now, he has the much more successful Bjorn Borg line, but those business failures rubbed a lot of businessmen the wrong way (they put their reputations on the line for Borg when he opened his big office in Fifth Avenue back in the day). All this from the Swedish documentary on Borg.

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 12:21 pm

    Thomas T
    Becker’s financial dealings seem complex, to say the least. He’s been declared bankrupt in England but I believe he has various monies stashed away in other places. So he’s not penniless. Just financially incompetent it seems to me.
    Bankruptcy in England carries with it all sorts of penalties but I imagine Boris will find ways around them.
    (I was certainly joking when I suggested he offer to coach Kerber – I think Angie would politely decline such an outlandish suggestion.)

    I did know about the mess Borg got into – but no one was particularly surprised. Lots of sports people start up these companies after retirement and, lacking any business expertise or nous, get led up the garden path.
    And into the bankruptcy court.

  • Scoop Malinowski · July 11, 2017 at 1:11 pm

    Scoop Malinowski writes:

    Bankruptcy is an interesting tactic. I know an older guy on Longboat Key in FL who declared yet he has a million $ beachfront mansion and drives around the key in a fancy Rolls Royce and he makes generous contributions to Israeli junior tennis. How is this possible? Should the bankruptcy declarer be forced to live a normal life and stripped of the big luxuries? I see Becker getting off this hook unscathed.

  • Scoop Malinowski · July 11, 2017 at 1:19 pm

    Scoop Malinowski writes:

    I don't think the world has embraced Kerber as no 1. She's not super popular and beloved and she only has a very few avid supporters/enthusiasts. There is no Kerber Army. I think this truth has hurt her ego and her spirit. The top players love the great support they get and it fuels them. Kerber just doesn't have that. I really don't think the WTA or the media or tennis fans around the world really are happy with her as no 1. No disrespect to her but she just doesn't have that IT factor or X factor that excites people. And this has affected her performance and enthusiasm. Just a theory.

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 2:07 pm

    Scoop –
    I think you’re right and I remember trying to say something like this before in a way that wouldn’t seem hurtful (as if she’d read it !).
    She’s from Northern Europe, a bit cool, a bit remote, on court, her clipped German accent creates a bit of distance in interviews. She doesn’t give much, we don’t feel we know too much about her although she does a lot of social media and seems outwardly friendly and co-operative.
    I’m not sure this lack of crowd appeal affects her performance – she might feel uncomfortable surrounded by mass adulation etc and I suspect she won’t mind reliquishing No 1. A self-contained person perhaps.
    She’s popular in Germany and that’s probably enough for her. No idea how fellow players see her.
    Coming from a similar type background I can identify with this and the absence of the Angie X factor doesn’t bother me at all. I just wish her career had worked out better lately – and had not encouraged some followers to underrate her as a player and be dismissive of her as a woman.

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 2:09 pm

    And now Simona’s gone I definitely want Venus to get her hands on that dish ๐Ÿ™‚

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 2:15 pm

    So it’s Konta, Muguruza, Venus, and winner of Rybaricova-Coco?
    Wow.
    Halep’s departure was never in doubt. She did well to make the quarters. She’s had a strong two slams. And look at it this way: her rival Ostapenko didn’t make it any further also.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 2:21 pm

    I’m fine with Kerber being tops. She earned the top spot in the sport. She just hasn’t earned her keep once she got there, and maybe she’s more suited to a lower ranking so she doesn’t feel she’s letting herself or others down. It’s not from a lack of popularity, it’s from an overwhelming feeling of pressure.

    Tennis is a merciless sport, and I don’t think Muguruza, etc are so popular either. She didn’t lose to a more popular player. And she’s even struggling on her home turf in Germany. Kerber suffers from poor prep and poor play and stagnant routines and, likely, not bringing in new staff to help her present coaches (all of whom I’m sure asked for a raise as Kerber’s winnings and popularity have risen).

    It ain’t the popularity. It’s the demands on a number one without relief or support.

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 2:23 pm

    Who else was a bad number one? There have been several. Being the Queen is great, but everyone wants your crown. That’s the issue. Once you get there it’s like ugh I have to do this too? Demands on the top player are heavy.

  • Scoop Malinowski · July 11, 2017 at 2:38 pm

    Scoop Malinowski writes:

    Kerber is not a bad number one. It's just that she does not transcend the sport at all and though she is very nice and classy and a good sport she does not transcend the sport and attract interest. She does not have special charisma. She does not stand out aside from her ranking. Graf was an amazing athlete. Becker had charisma and boom. Kerber is about as fascinating or appealing as Dinara Safina who did not last long. They were not bad no 1s but they were not great ones either like Fed Agassi Hingis Seles Serena etc).

  • catherine · July 11, 2017 at 2:49 pm

    Well, we don’t know about Kerber’s practice and routines etc,or staff, we’re just guessing. I don’t think Scoop meant that Angie lost that match because she didn’t have a cheering section – it’s a more general point. Popularity helps – ask Serena. And if you play poorly for a while, go out in the 1st,second round a lot, then you don’t get match practice.
    Angie said she’s learned ‘a few things’ in the past months but no one asked her what they were. Might have been interesting.
    I think Pliskova will be next No 1.

  • jg · July 11, 2017 at 3:50 pm

    Scoop, Florida has a very generous homestead exemption, your friend picked a favorable jurisdiction.

  • Scoop Malinowski · July 11, 2017 at 6:42 pm

    Scoop Malinowski writes:

    Kerber lost only because Muguruza played an incredible level of tennis. Kerber deserved the win. They both did. Just like Rafa and Gillou Muller both deserved the win.

  • Scoop Malinowski · July 11, 2017 at 6:44 pm

    Scoop Malinowski writes:

    jg; wouldn't be surprised if the law was set up to allow bankruptcy declarers and swindlers to flee to Florida. I guess Becker could end up in Florida?

  • Thomas Tung · July 11, 2017 at 7:46 pm

    Becker did have a place in Miami that he turned over to his ex-wife Barbara, and he’s good friends with Luis Garcia Fanjul (who may or may not be related to the prominent Fanjul family), so I wouldn’t be surprised if he decided to buy a place there again.

  • Hartt · July 11, 2017 at 7:53 pm

    Pliskova posted a pic on Instagram of her leaping in the air. She talked about what an honour it was to be No. 1 and wrote: “Being the world number one is also a big responsibility for me. I am aware of that and I can promise I will do my best not to disappoint in this role.”

  • Andrew Miller · July 11, 2017 at 8:06 pm

    Kerber, Kuznetsova have a lot in common as two time slam champs. Both hall of fame first ballot entries in the future no doubt, and both also not having significant runs at or near the top ranking (Kuznetsova was #2 ten years back). Kuznetsova, not super popular either, certainly has a top game, but like Kerber so inconsistent.
    It’s a hard sport. For what it’s worth both have exceeded their counterparts. Kuznetsova has beat out Myskina and Kirilenko and most Russians from her generation. Kerber exceeded Lisicki, arguably her more popular countrywoman, and others from Europe like Ivanovic, Pennetta etc. She’s proven hard work pays off.
    Just that now that she’s gotten to the top it hasn’t been a notable tenure. Some of her old habits, as with Djokovic, crept back into her game. Hard sport.

  • scoopmalinowski · July 11, 2017 at 10:03 pm

    Pliskova is nice and a good champion. Maybe being no 1 will spark her personality. But chances are shes a short term fill in.

  • catherine · July 12, 2017 at 3:17 am

    Becker has friends in many bankruptcy friendly places in the world it seems and I’m sure his money problems will turn out to be just temporary embarrassments.
    There was an interesting piece in one of the papers here on why Boris is more popular in Britain than Germany these days – it’s that British sympathy for a loser ๐Ÿ™‚

    Simona will win a GS title when she learns not to be so polite and satisfied about losing and stop the Pollyanna act which Cahill appears to encourage. She also needs to beef up her serve considerably – get a serving coach ?

    Pliskova will have a better time at the top than Angie did. Life around her will be calmer. And I wonder if Kerber’s experience might say something to any player, man or woman, who wants that position above all else.
    ‘Remember what it took to get you there’.

  • Andrew Miller · July 12, 2017 at 9:03 am

    Harrison and Mike Venus go down with a fifth set meltdown.

  • Andrew Miller · July 12, 2017 at 9:06 am

    Halep makes shrewd decision, hires Novotna for serve, Navratilova for volleys, Henin for strategy, and Evert for mental toughness. Coaching contract excludes on court coaching. She also drops by Macci academy on occasion, which convinces her to “hit harder”
    The above will never, ever, ever happen.

  • Andrew Miller · July 12, 2017 at 9:07 am

    Pliskova is pulling a Safina. She may deserve the top ranking on points, but she has no slam.

  • catherine · July 12, 2017 at 9:33 am

    Well gee Andrew – that lot’s going to cost Simona something but she could earn it back in triple Grand Slams ๐Ÿ™‚
    No, it won’t happen – Simona will keep racing around the baseline, reaching winning positions and then throwing them away, and follow up with ‘Big Hugs’ from Cahill as a reward.
    So you can see I’m a trifle disillusioned.

  • catherine · July 12, 2017 at 9:36 am

    Looks like Murray over Querrey in 4.

  • catherine · July 12, 2017 at 11:22 am

    Hmmm – that was a bit premature – and what is it with hips ? Murray apparently hampered with one today.

  • Thomas Tung · July 12, 2017 at 11:59 am

    Combination of good play from Querrey and the hip injury did in Murray today. Andy tried, but the hip was too difficult to overcome.

1 2 3 4

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com