12
PavyG Anti Doping Crusade Making A Difference
7 Comments · Posted by Scoop Malinowski in Bios
By Scoop Malinowski
There’s one man out there calling for justice and fairness in the Jannik Sinner doping controversy which saw the Italian get busted with two positive drug tests – but no ban or punishment compared to other suspended players in the past.
The man from London has over 30,000 followers on X and has been relentlessly and vehemently pursuing justice for months with his non-stop posts.
The latest…
- Just a reminder of what Nicolas Jarry from Chile had to go through when he failed a drug test and was proven not to have intentionally doped as well, he was banned for 11 months and still feels the trauma of it all. Nicolas Jarry v Jannik Sinner tomorrow.
- The ‘Sinner case’ annoys Jarry: “I would have liked the same support” Jarry admitted he still can’t overcome the trauma of his doping suspension and compared to Sinner’s.
- Are Navratilova, Petchey, Roddick and Jon Wertheim being told to defend Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek for failing drug tests from the very same people/organisation that told them to turn on Novak Djokovic for not being vaccinated and to convince and push people to get vaccinated?
PavyG’s crusade is without a doubt having influence. I have followed this controversy since the summer. Sinner’s excuse story about the topical cream mishap and his team not doing anything wrong almost worked until he fired two of his team members. If nobody did anything wrong, why didn’t Sinner defend and protect his employees?
PavyG has awakened a lot of tennis fans to the hypocrisy of the establishment protecting Sinner because he’s a key figure in their long term business plans and agendas. Banned players like Brooksby, Jarry, Troicki, Ymer, Halep, were not as important or valuable so they were suspended.
Even a former Grand Slam champion Yevgeny Kafelnikov has publicly supported PavyG’s truth, justice and accountability campaign.
World Anti Doping Agency has appealed the ruling to protect Sinner and it looks like all the fuss will result in Sinner ultimately enduring a ban of a year or maybe even two years.
I have to say, if it was not for PavyG’s tirelessly pointing out the hypocrisy and pleading for equal treatment, day after day, I think the whole mess would have passed by now and Sinner would be cruising along in his career after dodging the bullet.
But the establishment media failed to cover it all up. And PavyG’s voice has created a storm of outrage from a growing legion of devoted tennis fans. Everybody wants our great sport to be saved from corruption and foul play and no player like Sinner should get special treatment after failing two drug tests.
The mainstream tennis media bias and agendas sabotaged and nullified itself after the whole Novak Djokovic Covid Shot drama a few short years ago. The tennis media tried to character assassinate Novak and his entire career because he dared to defy the establishment agenda to push vaccine drug shots on everyone, not respecting personal freedom of choice or many people’s distrust of any kind of drugs.
So that incident opened a chasm for a new, more honest and fair tennis media to step in and replace the old fake news, crooked tennis media and that’s exactly what has happened and PavyG is leading the charge. And a lot of people are listening to him and is messages. Novak Djokovic even mentioned PavyG by name at a Grand Slam press conference last year.
For those who question if “one man” can actually make a difference in such a giant sport as tennis, I can share an example as proof that it can happen.
Back in the early 2000s the great boxing champion Roy Jones Jr. was being hunted by the colorful, talkative challenger Antonio Tarver. It was a fascinating grudge match but the established Jones was trying to dodge the outsider Tarver because he was so dangerous. They finally fought and Jones won a close decision in a thrilling fight. A rematch was natural but Jones did not want to fight Tarver again, he wanted easy safe fights and HBO Boxing, his broadcaster, played along with what Jones wanted and offered Tarver a TV date with a patsy opponent.
Tarver vehemently rejected the nonsense and crusaded and demanded the rematch with Jones. He did not stop interviews with a couple of reporters, mocking Jones for ducking him and handpicking no hope challengers which HBO would pay for. It was ridiculous, everyone wanted to see Jones vs Tarver 2 except Jones and HBO. The boxing media played along and was protecting Jones, the establishment star like Sinner.
Except me. I wrote numerous articles for Boxinginsider.com demanding Jones be forced to fight Tarver again, that’s the only fight that mattered. Finally, suddenly after a few months, Jones agreed and signed for the rematch. The press conference to announce Jones vs Tarver 2 was at Tavern On The Green in Central Park, New York City. I was there that day and to my surprise, Tarver’s lawyer Charles Muniz approached me before the conference began. I had never met him before. I still remember what Muniz told me, “It was your articles which made this rematch happen. Thank you.” At first I was shocked to hear that my articles were so influential in helping produce such a major fight, after Jones tried so hard to duck Tarver again.
But it really did happen exactly as I say, and guess what? Tarver knocked out Roy Jones with one punch in the second round of one of the most exciting knockouts in boxing history. Another incredible moment happened during the referee instructions. Tarver said straight to Roy’s face, “Yeah I have a question. What excuses are you going to use tonight Roy?” It was a Muhammad Ali moment. And all this would have never happened if it were not for my articles, as Charles Muniz revealed.
So you all must realize, one man can make a difference and PavyG is proving it again with his dogged pursuit of fairness and justice in pro tennis.
Watch the Tarver second round KO of Roy Jones here link
ATP · Jannik Sinner · PavyG
Namaste · January 12, 2025 at 2:02 pm
the article is a jumble of lies, starting from the last tweets cited, up to the rambling praise of a caricature character who, if he is blocked by all the most famous accounts, including the atp, it is certainly not for his “dangerousness”, but only for his conspiracy idiocies… The worst part is when the author, unable to find a pertinent analogy, ends up quoting and praising himself because once his articles would have brought a boxer back to the ring. If this is making a “difference”… maybe it would be better to throw this article in the trash…
Scoop Malinowski · January 12, 2025 at 3:05 pm
The closer one gets to the hidden truth, the more he will be attacked. the establishment media is all controlled so they fear a guy who challenges them. they can’t handle the truth.
Namaste · January 12, 2025 at 4:31 pm
But this has nothing to do with the criticisms I made of your post, with the references to the alleged truth, which seem more like a clumsy attempt to change the subject. So let’s stick to the content of the post…
Are you surely that to explain who “makes the difference”, there wasn’t a better analogy than the author quoting himself? Isn’t that too self-congratulatory? Or again, when you throw out the theory according to which, if Sinner’s collaborators didn’t do anything wrong, he should have defended them. Only Sinner never said that they didn’t do anything wrong, but only that HE didn’t do it. So why do you keep telling lies, even pretending to pass them off as truth?
As for Pavvy, I don’t know how anyone could think that someone would want to stop him… He has his channels and no one stops him from using them to communicate his narrative. It seems to me instead that he is the only one who is more worried when others use theirs, in an equally legitimate way…
Scoop Malinowski · January 12, 2025 at 6:09 pm
What are you trying to do? discredit Pavyg? If Sinner did nothing wrong why didn’t he demand his points and prize money back? why couldn’t the two team members do a press conference and answer to the media? why did sinner insist that the forthcoming Wada appeal must be behind closed doors? this suggests he has a lot to hide. I think it’s possible Sinner and Cahill told a phony story knowing they had establishment protection. The fact the establishment covered up the story for months also points to corruption.
Namaste · January 13, 2025 at 2:46 am
What I am trying to do is just demonstrate how, when on the other side of the screen there is an interlocutor who knows how to handle lies and truths, your answers are absent and inconsistent. Answering my questions with other questions is not answering those questions, but again, changing the subject.
If we really want to handle the truth, then let’s do it without hiding. Now I’ll explain how to do it…
First question about the revoked points and prize money, you cannot return them because you cannot go against the rules. If you are found positive during a tournament, even if you are later found innocent, even for cases of negligence, it is an automatic rule that the prizes and points earned are subtracted.
Second question: Why were the two members of the team unable to hold a press conference and answer the media? Good question, which I also done, asking some Italian journalists if they could interview them, if they had at least tried, and they told me that they cannot do so while the proceedings are still ongoing. When it’s all over, they’ll be interviewed by major talk shows and newspapers, and I can’t wait either…
Third question about the closed-door trial… First of all, we need to understand that we’re not talking about a real “trial” with real judges, real criminals, etc… All that happens in a CAS hearing is that an arbitration court listens to the arbitration version of the 2 parties who decide the modalities. In any case, the reasons for the sentence will have to be PUBLIC, that means the CAS will have to explain to the public, but above all to the media and legal experts, what the athlete should have done differently. Again, I can’t wait…
As for the rest of your opinions or words you love to hide behind, like the establishment, Spectra, the mainstream media, corruption and blah blah, we could say the same about WADA, questioned every day by the NYT articles but about which you and Pavvy never say anything, because maybe you don’t know how to handle the other version of the truth. But one thing are thoughts, our suppositions, another are facts, which will always have to be demonstrated. Again, I can’t wait…
Scoop Malinowski · January 13, 2025 at 9:33 am
You believe the excuse stories of Sinner and Swiatek, I and many others do not. Sinner and his backers have hundreds of millions at stake so the motive is there to fabricate a phony story to save the money train. Roy Jones was busted in 2000 for a positive test after the Richard Hall fight in Indianapolis. The Indianapolis boxing commission head Jacob Hall revealed in an interview with a very small boxing site that Jones and Richard Hall BOTH tested positive for steroids. The boxing and sports media ignored this story even after I interviewed Jacob and he confirmed to be Roy Jones tested positive. That’s a huge story – the biggest star in boxing tested positive. Guess what, the story was completely ignored by the media and Jones never was suspended. That’s how it works, the big stars like Roy Jones and Sinner are protected by their establishments.
Steve · January 13, 2025 at 11:27 am
I think the problem was that it was kept secret but other than that I like the way it was handled. It should be the new standard that a player continues to play until the investigation is complete. It was reported the amount was less than a grain of salt and so the massage oil cause is plausible. If there was Lance Armstrong-like intent then you drop a ban on them however if it takes 6 months for a full investigation so be it. Just like when a player is accused of beating their GFs they continue to play until their day in court and let’s have the investigations be announced publicly.
He fired those guys because he counts on these people to get things right. A top player cannot do everything and research everything. It was a major eff up and they had to go. Sinner is innocent but the system must change.