Tennis Prose




Sep/17

28

Johan Kriek Reviews “Battle of the Sexes” Film

1916638_10206796116074740_2146710316373891023_n

By Johan Kriek

Just saw the premier opening at a movie theatre of the “Battle of the Sexes” . We were invited and my coaches came and it was fun!

Bobby Riggs the gambler and showman who was a terrific professional (probably more professional in gambling but he called it hustling) vs Billie Jean King the trailblazer and living icon in women’s tennis.

Vince Spadea was the tennis double for Riggs with one handed slice backhands and he did a great job. I have no idea who doubled as a player for Billie Jean but she was great too!

The storyline was great, the videography shooting it was very realistic for the colors of the time on tv (looks analog) vs the bright HD of today’s tv would not have worked. The extras were great especially seeing my pal Lornie Kuhle as the on court announcer and interviewer.

All in all a very good tennis movie with a very compelling story and the climb of women’s tennis to professionalism equal in prize money to the men we see today. I normally didn’t like tennis movies in the past because they were quite bad and one could easily see the bad strokes etc but this one was very realistic for the times. I learned some new things I didn’t know before and I wonder if others know more than I from that era who may say “well that scene was a bit “Hollywoodish”. I recommend go see it!

No tags

59 comments

  • JG · September 28, 2017 at 4:48 pm

    nice review, the BJK tennis double was Katilyn Christian who graduated from USC and is playing futures tournaments now, she is apparently a serve and volley player which is why she was selected (but who knows)

  • scoopmalinowski · September 28, 2017 at 7:15 pm

    Shoutout to Ash Barty. Started yr ranked 271. Now ranked 26. Beat Bellis, Radwanska, Konta this week and Pliskova today 467676. Remember Barty was off for over a year. Quit tennis. Comeback of the decade maybe?

  • Dan Markowitz · September 28, 2017 at 8:56 pm

    Barty is impressive. Funny, Spadea hitting one handed backhand slices. He probably never hit one his whole career.

    What about Rubin getting blitzed by Mmoh 1 and 2 and then Mmoh taking out Kamke! Groth has really fallen off the cliff after doing so well 2-3 years ago.

  • Hartt · September 29, 2017 at 7:28 am

    Barty beat Ostapenko 6-3, 6-0. Apparently Ostapenko seemed tired, and her poor serving did not help. Someone posted that Barty is now No. 23 in live rankings!

  • catherine · September 29, 2017 at 7:35 am

    Hartt – just posted that below – if Ashleigh continues like this she’ll be in top 10 !

  • catherine · September 29, 2017 at 9:07 am

    Scoop – I’ll post here re Mandlikova/Kerber and ‘enigmas’ etc because it’s the newest thread. I’ve got a copy of a short para I did on Hana from a photo book published in 1982, and the last piece I wrote for the magazine was also on Hana and that was 1989. Unfortunately the only copy I know of reposes now in the W’don Museum Library. I can’t actually remember anything about it or even why I wrote it.

    This piece appeared opposite a head shot of Hana:
    ‘Hana Mandlikova’s expression here is dubious; so, at this time, was her career.
    Hana came from the new generation of Czech players who grew up in the years following Martina Navratilova’ defection to the United States. As a youngster she had ballgirled for Msartina at the Sparta Club in Prague.
    Hana modelled her serve and volley style on Martina’s example, but she didn’t share Navralitova’s variety of shot or imperious personality.
    After some early successes Hana was afflicted with a back injury and then devastating and demoralising losses.
    Her place in the game’s heirarchy remains problematical.

    She’s tall, slim, shy, unprovative; her strokes are graceful, orthodox,evanescent. Her attitude to the strain of competition is often bafflingly placid.
    What’s going on behind that headband is known to very few.’

    Hana of course went on to have a pretty good career except for W’don, where her first appearance caused Chris Evert to observe that Hana ‘didn’t deserve to win Wimbledon’ and her second was an exit to Navratilova notable mainly for its speed.
    She got the ‘enigma’ label I suppose because her record was so erratic and she lost too many matches through sheer inattention, or maybe just nerves. She was also famously laconic in press conferences and you had the feeling she would have avoided all that if she could. (she did indeed hide in the public toilet at the USO to avoid the hacks)Hana had an excessively private side and you wonder how she would have coped in the era of social media. Introverted ? Yes, definitely.

    Kerber of course is a very different person from Hana with a career in no way comparable but ‘enigmatic’ maybe because of her unwillingnes/inability to talk much about her matches – you feel she too would rather be somewhere else- her similar erratic performances, an
    introverted personality which shows itself in undemonstative behaviour on court – an opaque character who nevertheless presents herself as open and friendly.
    I’ll finish this very long post with a couple of questions:
    Why does Angelique Kerber attract so much unpleasant online abuse ?
    And why did Barbara Rittner have to ask the German media to hold off being so hard on Angie ?

  • Scoop Malinowski · September 29, 2017 at 9:14 am

    If Barty keeps on hammering major champions with bagels, she might be headed higher than top ten, like top three.

  • Scoop Malinowski · September 29, 2017 at 9:18 am

    Catherine, maybe Mandlikova suffered from that follow a star syndrome, like Anke Huber being held up to Graf standards and expectations. Maybe Hana was expected to be the next Martina? Which is unfair and impossible to live up to. All the Americans post Pete Andre Jim Chang dealt with the same pressures. And I don’t get a sense Martina was very helpful to young Hana. Martina’s ruthlessness as a player/champion may have been second to none. Also I wonder if Hana could have been one of those shy young talented players who never really had a choice about her life, she showed talent and potential and they just forced her into being a tennis player. You wonder if she really loved it, her facial expressions on the court and around the scene would suggest no. Thanks for sharing Catherine.

  • Hartt · September 29, 2017 at 9:19 am

    Thanks for this post on Mandlikova.I always feel sorry for the introverted players. It is difficult enough to win big tennis matches, but to have to deal with so much media attention, plus other attention, must be extremely tough, especially if you are not an extrovert.

    Along with all his other gifts, Federer was blessed with an outgoing personality, which must have made being in the public eye so much easier to handle. Just having to do press in 3 or 4 different languages after a match would be a strain for most people.

  • Hartt · September 29, 2017 at 10:13 am

    After the Canuck youngsters, Auger-Aliassime and Schnur are out of the Tiburon Challenger, “oldie” Frank Dancevic is still holding the Canadian flag.

    Several American players are still in – McDonald, Mmoh, C. Harrison and Sandgren.

  • catherine · September 29, 2017 at 11:10 am

    Scoop – you’re right – I often wondered how much Hana really enjoyed playing and yet when she beat Martina at the US Open her joy was clearly genuine and a pleasure to see.
    Hana also played a lot of doubles and actually teamed up with Martina to win the USO doubles I think – can’t remember what year. I think they got along ok later in Hana’s career.

  • Hartt · September 29, 2017 at 11:57 am

    Madison Keys has withdrawn from Beijing because of ongoing pain in her wrist. This is very concerning. Will her wrist problems derail her career?

  • catherine · September 29, 2017 at 12:59 pm

    Hartt – yes I had a bad feeling when I read she was complaining about her wrist in Wuhan. Wrist problems have indeed derailed several careers in tennis. It’s a complicated joint.

  • Dan Markowitz · September 29, 2017 at 1:56 pm

    Let me posit a guess on Mandlikova and whether she liked playing tennis. If you play for a long time and then you coach your children to be tournament players, chances are you like the sport or you’re being a sadist to your kids and you don’t see that too often.

    I’m not saying I’m a player of Hana M’s ability, but I wouldn’t have introduced my son to the game at such a young age and gotten him into tournaments unless I liked the game.

  • catherine · September 29, 2017 at 2:11 pm

    Dan – I think Mandlikova liked tennis allright once she’d stopped playing tournaments – she was involved for a while in Czech tennis with their Fed Cup team and as we know coached Jana Novotna. It was the stress and strain of the tournament circuit which got to her – she was also never a robust player and had a number of injuries. So retirement was probably a bit of a relief.

  • Scoop Malinowski · September 29, 2017 at 4:50 pm

    But Dan, some people know nothing else. I would guess Hana’s entire life was tennis. Like Spadea. They don’t really know anything else. Some people just are tennis players and that’s it. Then they coach. Lifers. Segura, Winitsky, Bloom, Buehning, Mary Pierce, etc. Even Pete Sampras said it in his Hall of Fame speech, something like I’m just a tennis player. Did Mandliova show joy on the court?

  • catherine · September 30, 2017 at 2:54 am

    Scoop – As I mentioned above Hana certainly showed joy when she beat Martina at the US Open and I think she enjoyed doubles, since she played quite a lot and the stress wasn’t there for her as it was in singles. But no, she didn’t exude Pollyanna happiness on court. Tennis was a serious business for her. Maybe too serious.

  • dan markowitz · September 30, 2017 at 6:21 am

    I remember talking to Davide Sanguinetti who had a long career and is now coaching too, and he has a daughter and I asked him if his daughter played, and she was like 10 at the time, and he said she’s never picked up a racquet. Even though tennis might be all you know, it was for Steffi and Agassi too, sometimes you purposefully don’t introduce it to your children because you don’t want them to have the same tournament and training grind that you had.

    I feel that with my son because also plays high-level baseball. My everyday is filled with bringing him to practices, games and matches. He seems to like it and never tells me he doesn’t want to play either sport, but sometimes, especially when it comes to tennis which is so cutthroat (Callum was playing a top junior in the 12’s yesterday in practice and the kid in practice matches cheats and questions every lines call, and Fritz just told me its good practice for Callum learning how to deal with a kid like this because in junior tennis you run into a few of these kind of kids).

    Sometimes I wish I hadn’t signed him up for tournaments since he was 8 and just had the fun of hitting with him, but when a kid is good, your inclination (or at least mine was) is to see how good he is and you can only do that by playing tournaments.

  • Hartt · September 30, 2017 at 7:38 am

    Dan, Callum is fortunate to be good at two sports (even if it means double the driving for you!). It probably keeps each sport fresher for him than he if spent all his time on one. Do you think he will make a career in one of them?

    I love the stories of how some of the top players started playing tennis. So many picked up a racquet when it was nearly as big as they were. Federer’s mother talks about how he hit not just against the garage door but even against the kitchen cupboards. I am surprised she put up with that – she said it was an incessant whack, whack.

  • Hartt · September 30, 2017 at 7:50 am

    One good thing about the WTA being so wide open is that you get interesting matches from the first round. Already in Beijing we have had Kerber over Osaka and Kvitova over Kr. Pliskova in SS, plus Halep over Riske in 3. Sharapova vs Sevastova is just beginning.

  • catherine · September 30, 2017 at 7:51 am

    Several tennis players have had children who played tennis but I can’t think of any offspring who went on to achieve much in the sport. Some sports seem to run in families but not tennis.
    I wonder if Steffi and Agassi’s children had shown interest and talent in the game they would have been positively dissuaded from pursuing it ? Seems a bit hard to me, although you can understand the parents’ point of view.

  • catherine · September 30, 2017 at 8:36 am

    Hartt – I wish the crowd (singular) was worth the matches. Could count about 3 people when Kerber and Osaka played – I know it was the 1st match but the atmosphere must have been zero. Picked up a bit to maybe 10 later on. Almost always poor crowds for WTA in China.
    Kerber/Osaka met for 3rd time in 4 weeks. Must be sick of the sight of each other.
    Garcia is winning in Wuhan – I think she’s a much improved player.

  • Dan Markowitz · September 30, 2017 at 8:41 am

    Vijay’s son was a top 150 player. Stan Smith’s son was no 1 at Duke. Tracy Austin’s son plays for USC I think. Pat Cash’s son played at SMU I think. Fritz Buehning says his son is now training for a pro career. So there are actually a lot of kids who’s parents were famous players who play the game. Casper Ruud, Michael Mmoh, I’m sure there are more.

    We’ve never seen an offspring surpass his father/mother the way a Ken Griffey Jr. did in baseball or Al Horford or Andrew Wiggins in basketball. And I think it’s because for a kid to do really well in tennis, a parent has to bust his/her butt, and for a former pro player, they’ve mostly had enough with non-stop tennis.

    But it helps to have a parent who can play. My son’s hitting partner just called in sick for this morning, so guess who hits with Cal? He hates it because I don’t hit rally balls, even now I chip and charge off second serves and hit much bigger serves than he’s used to seeing. But I also make him hit swinging volleys, overheads, approach shots, two-volley sequences, slice and kick serves and droppers that not even his coaches mostly do or have the time to do with him.

  • Hartt · September 30, 2017 at 9:26 am

    What I find interesting is the number of players today whose parents were pro players, maybe not famous ones, but were able to coach their kids at an early age before turning them over to other coaches.

    Denis Shapovalov’s mother was his first coach and she wisely allowed him to play with a one-handed BH and the aggressive style that came to him naturally as a kid. Sascha and Mischa Zverev have 2 parents who had been good players and Sascha credits his mother with his excellent BH. Thiem’s father is a professional coach, although Thiem has worked with Bresnik from an early age. These are just a few examples.

  • Dan Markowitz · September 30, 2017 at 9:44 am

    Getting back, ahem, to the genesis of this post, “The Battle of the Sexes,” here’s my friend Fleur’s review of the movie. Fleur’s daughter is on the pro golf tour and she’s originally from New Zealand, but she spent most of her life in Australia and she’s a good tennis player herself.

    “…is absolutely brilliant, I hope you’ve seen it.
    Notice your mate Vince Spadea had a pretty big hand in it. I loved it. I was only vaguely aware of the whole circus- what a brave trailblazer BJK was and is.
    We have a lot to thank her for.

    Alan Cumming, who played teddy tinling, is one of my favourite actors, so it ticked a lot of boxes. Very topical too, as Australia is voting on marriage equality at the moment and Margaret Court can’t keep her mouth shut. I’m sure Australians will vote emphatically yes and then it will only be a matter of time before they change their archaic laws.”

    I’m going tonight to see the movie and hope to enjoy it as much as Fleur.

  • Hartt · September 30, 2017 at 10:14 am

    Dan, am looking forward to your impression of the movie. So far have heard good things about it. Bill Gates even posted a positive review on reddit.

  • Scoop Malinowski · September 30, 2017 at 12:44 pm

    Kozlov’s father was around 400 in the world, played Volkov, and Stefan hit 115 earlier this year, so that’s a rare example of a kid surpassing the parent. Vasselin of France had a famous pro father who played French Open and probably other majors, but not sure which one has had the better career. Nick Bollettieri told me one of McEnroe’s sons attended NBTA. It’s curious how it’s so rare for former pros to have kids who become pros too.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 1, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    Interesting finals in Tiburon Challenger. Norrie who’s dropped only one set and Sandgren who hasn’t dropped a set. Mac Mac had a nice tourney beating Darius King and Kudla before losing 6 and 6 to Tennys. And in Orleans, France, you’ve got Benny Benneteau going for Challenger win. Amazing how long and well these French journeyman players play. Problem with French players now is they’re all basically journeyman players.

  • catherine · October 1, 2017 at 1:18 pm

    Norrie might be the big story now in UK since Konta dumped out of Beijing in humiliating fashion by Nicolescu of all people and will probably fail to reach the end of year Finals.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 1, 2017 at 2:02 pm

    Norrie’s name keeps popping up all year. Sandgren showing steady results. Kozlov and B Klein have resurfaced in next week’s Stockton Challenger. Kozlov in as an ALT, will play Canadian Schnur. Both looking for first wins in over a month. Boris Kozlov lost in qualies in three sets to veteran Halebian. Sebi Korda won in three sets over a red hot Stanford player Tom Fawcett. Looks like 17 yr old Korda will likely turn pro and skip college is my guess.

  • Thomas Tung · October 1, 2017 at 3:18 pm

    Re: lack of fans at Chinese sporting events —

    Note that China is still very much into the “work above all, putting food on the table” mentality, as the “rich Chinese”, as numerous as they are, are a very small percentage of the total Chinese poplulation of 1.38 BILLION (emphasis mine). 100 million Chinese that would be considered “middle class” is a huge number, like around 30% of the US population, but pales before that Great Wall of 1.38 billion …

    Taking time off from work during a weekday to watch a strictly leisurely (bordering on frivolous, in their cultural understanding) “sport” is practically unheard of in China; not even for basketball (which is the most popular sport over there). Weekends might be justifiable, depending on job position. There are people who can take any day off to watch sports live, but they are in a place where they can afford to do so (money, Party connections, strong guanxi).

  • Hartt · October 1, 2017 at 3:41 pm

    Poor Benneteau. I hoped he could at least win this Challenger. He has never won an ATP title, despite making it to 10 finals. However, the last time he was a RU in an ATP tour event was about 3 years ago.

  • Thomas Tung · October 1, 2017 at 5:12 pm

    Yes, Benneteau is the prennial bridesmaid in ATP finals. Denis Istomin was, as well, but for his win on grass in 2015 Nottingham and earlier today in Chengdu (via retirement) over the injured Baghdatis.

  • catherine · October 2, 2017 at 2:10 am

    Thanks Thomas for that explanation – makes sense, but seems such a waste of what looks like great sports facilities – playing in those cavernous arenas must often seem a bit spooky to players used to bigger crowds.

  • Krzysztof · October 2, 2017 at 6:13 am

    As for famous father-son pairs, Dolgopolov Alexander and Alexander Senior as well as Dent Phil and Taylor are worth mentioning. Alexander’s father was only ATP 500 so son is far higher than father, in case of Dents, Taylor was ATP no. 21 and Taylor no. 17, so quite similarily.

  • Hartt · October 2, 2017 at 7:44 am

    Right now Carrena Busta and Darcis are playing in a much smaller stadium in Beijing. It is still a small crowd but at least it does not look so strange.

    Commies saying that PCB has an excellent chance to make London for the first time.

  • Dan Markowitz · October 2, 2017 at 8:40 am

    Are you talking about the Chinese commies or the television commentators.

    Yes, Krzysztof, that’s a good one, Taylor and Phil Dent would have to be the no 1 father and son tandem. I don’t remember Dolgo’s father as a top player.

    Here’s my review of “The Battle of the Sexes.” I didn’t love it and yet I wasn’t totally bored by it. I felt the directors/writers made a tactical error by focusing so much on Billie Jean’s flourishing love affair with her female hairdresser, which I thought was kind of rote stuff even though the two actresses, Emma Stone, and the woman who plays the hairdresser, Andrea Riseborough, are both very good.

    In every movie, one person is the star, it’s essentially their story, and in this movie it’s Billie Jean and Emma Stone. To me, I think the match should’ve been the star, but instead the actual match while it was technically done well (and it was interesting to see Vince Spadea body-doubling for Steve Carrell and Bobby Riggs), was not dramatic at all. Billie Jean won in straight sets (none of this best-of- three sets but rather best-of-five that was over in three) and the tennis while period correct, was not particularly compelling or exciting to watch. The die was cast early and you could tell from the start that Bobby was going to be no match for Billie.

    And maybe that’s why the movie producers put the emphasis on Billie and her sexual awakening just as women’s tennis was breaking through and out on its own to start the WTA Tour and fight for equal prize money. I had no idea that the great Jack Kramer played such a formidable role in trying to stop the women from achieving equal footing with the men players. He’s played by Bill Pullman in the movie and Billie Jean and Kramer knock heads a couple of major times in the movie and I learned that Billie Jean refused to play the match if Kramer was one of the ABC broadcasters along with Howard Cosell and Rosie Casals.

    (I also learned that Billie Jean defaulted her third round match in the US Nationals only two weeks before the match, mostly because of the pressure of the upcoming Riggs match).

    So historically the movie was very illuminating and correct and does a good job in recreating characters like Gladys Heldman played by a sterling Sarah Silverman (the cast has some big names in smaller roles like Elizabeth Shue, Alan Cummings and Fred Armisen) and showing the gutsy quality of the pioneering young women players and how they highlighted their attractiveness to offset what Kramer pointed out was their lack of speed, athleticism and strength compared to the men, and I’m a big Steve Carrell fan and thought he did a great job portraying the chauvinistic and pompous, but colorful, Riggs; but the movie didn’t have anything major at stake. We already knew the match would be a trouncing and Riggs’s easy defeat of Margaret Court (1 and 2), the movie seems to say, made him over-confident and he didn’t train and went on a crazy vitamin-filled quest for the King match. There were also some interesting historical cameos like seeing the very young Chris Evert predicting that Riggs would beat King because a woman couldn’t compete with a man.

    Some real tension was avoided or negated when Larry King in the movie finds out about the lesbian affair Billie Jean is carrying on with the tour’s hairdresser and instead of confronting her or fighting for her, he just tapes her knees with ice and departs, but before doing so he tells the hairdresser that Billie Jean will leave her too because nothing gets in the way of her tennis, her true love, which is also a bit trite.

    Everyone was better looking than the real people in the movie, for example, Emma Stone is far better looking than Billie Jean (although there we also hear Cosell saying that BJK if she took her glasses off is very pretty or something of that content) and BJK’s husband, Larry King, is incredibly handsome in the movie when in real life I remember him to be a kind of mousy dude. Another thing that sort of ruined it for me was a shot of Emma Stone running in training for the match, and she runs in the ramrod straight form that no true athlete would ever run like.

    So, as a tennis fan and someone who remembers the match pretty well, I was compelled to see the movie and would recommend it to other tennis fans and people who want to see a well-acted period piece (there’s even a taping of President Richard Nixon congratulating Billie Jean as a fellow Californian of achieving the no. 1 ranking), but it just didn’t light an imaginative fire in me and like any great work of art, I didn’t feel myself get swept away with the story.

    I give it three out of five stars.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 2, 2017 at 8:42 am

    Thomas, but at least Shanghai draws a lot of super excited fans. I always remember the first time Shanghai hosted the Masters final the crowds were the loudest and most animated I had ever heard. It almost sounded like they piped in a sound system to blare a sound track of people screaming in hysterical excitement. Does anybody else remember how loud those first Shanghai fans sounded? But the outer cities beyond Shanghai, yes all the tournaments look sparsely attended. Heck, I’ve played in front of bigger crowds in local NJ and Florida matches and tournaments.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 2, 2017 at 8:44 am

    Carrena Busta could win a major in the next three years.

  • Hartt · October 2, 2017 at 10:28 am

    Scoop, I am a big PCB fan, but he is 26 now, he needs to get a move on if he is going to win a Slam. I was so disappointed in his match today. Darcis was very good but in that first set where Pablo ate a bagel the Spaniard was simply terrible.

  • catherine · October 2, 2017 at 10:31 am

    Dan – Rosie Casals was the only player among the other women who knew BJ would win. She bet on it and probably cleaned up.

    The women, BTW, still have their attractiveness and ‘glamour’ highlighted to make up for their perceived inferiority to the men players. The WTA does that now. I don’t know if we’ve progressed or gone backwards. Or just stayed in the same place.

    I can understand you weren’t swept away by the story – there really was no story. It was just about money.

  • catherine · October 2, 2017 at 10:47 am

    Sloane Stephens hasn’t impressed so far in China. She doesn’t seem to concerned about it either.

    Wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a new WTA No 1 by the end of the year. That trophy is going to get worn out soon with all the handing around that’s going on.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 2, 2017 at 11:03 am

    No rush for Pablo, Hartt. He could pull a Wawrinka or Pennetta. Or Andres Gomez or Thomas Muster or Thomas Johansson or Petr Korda. There is no rush because every player evolves at different speeds.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 2, 2017 at 11:06 am

    I don’t see Sloane cleaning up the rest of the year, I see her cruising through the rest of the year and reawakening in Melbourne. It seems most of the top players wait until the majors to go all ALL out. Elongating their careers and preserving bodies is what matters most now. Even Thiem seems to be slowing down outside the majors.

  • catherine · October 2, 2017 at 11:57 am

    Yes – even in Beijing which is a Premier Mandatory I don’t get the feeling some players are going all out. Either they’re getting viruses or they’re just losing. There seems to be a problem with scheduling the end of the year but I’m not sure what it is or if it can be resolved. Goes for ATP too. If you’re not in the Finals you might as well take a break. Back in the day I always felt the year ended with the USO and after that there were only a few tournaments and DC. Not possible now with more sponsors, more money etc etc.
    Kerber looked sluggish losing to Cornet – came out in a tracksuit and played with a long sleeved top. Konta seemed quite uninterested, unless she had a virus too.
    I think Radwanska made some comment on this topic.

  • Hartt · October 2, 2017 at 1:00 pm

    At least PCB is going deeper in Slams – this year he got to the SF of the USO, QF of the FO and 3R of AO.

    So maybe next year he will make a final. 🙂

  • Hartt · October 2, 2017 at 1:05 pm

    Dan, thanks for your review of “Battle of the Sexes.” The part of the story I find interesting is the women players having the guts to strike out on their own, instead of continuing to put up with discrimination, so I hope that part is highlighted.

    In terms of Margaret Court, I remember reading a long time ago BJK’s comments. She thought that Court did not take her match with Riggs seriously and did not really train for it. She thought that Court was excited about the $ involved, but did not understand the broader ramifications of the match.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 2, 2017 at 1:25 pm

    Court probably didn’t care about the political ramifications of beating Riggs. It’s a weird freaky dynamic for a woman to play a man, just look at the Renee Richards situation or Karsten Braasch vs Venus and Serena in those Aussie practice sets, which the media curiously does not care much about. You would think Braasch would be a media target because whooping both Venus and Serena is a very interesting sellable story. Maybe Hollywood will make a movie about those practice sets next 🙂 Not sure who the director could cast to play to do Braasch’s wacky serve.

  • Scoop Malinowski · October 2, 2017 at 1:28 pm

    Catherine, it makes sense for the top players to take it easy from Oct to Dec. Why risk an injury to possibly miss the beginning of the next year? Great time to recharge batteries. There might be a few scavenger players trying to salvage bad or off years with late season points or results. Tomic for one really needs some fuel for his confidence tank. Surely there are a few others in Tomic’s boat.

  • catherine · October 2, 2017 at 1:32 pm

    Hartt – the women actually struck out on their own a couple of years before the Riggs match so it wasn’t really about that. Riggs was just a compulsive gambler and he thought he’d found a new attention-getting wheeze, which he had of course.

    Margaret was flattered by Riggs, he presented her with a bunch of roses as a start – it was really a rather minor affair at that time.She wasn’t wrapped in Women’s Lib like BJ and would never have countenanced a performance like the Astrodome. She wouldn’t have seen the point.
    I don’t think Margaret could have beaten Riggs however hard she trained – she was a great player but basically conservative – she didn’t have BJ’s flexible tennis mind and was mentally vulnerable. Their H2H comes out in Margaret’s favour but the Riggs circus was something different.

1 2

<<

>>

Find it!

Copyright 2010
Tennis-Prose.com
To top